Galvani C A, Gorodner M V, Moser F, Jacobsen G, Chretien C, Espat N J, Donahue P, Horgan S
Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, University of Illinois, 840 South Wood Street, Room 435, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2008 Jan;22(1):188-95. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9441-3.
Esophagectomy is a technically demanding operation with high procedure-related morbidity and mortality rates. Minimally invasive techniques were introduced in the late 1980s in an effort to decrease the invasiveness of the procedure. Data concerning the use of robotic systems for esophageal cancer are scarce in the literature. The goal of this report is to describe the authors' early experience using robotically assisted technology to perform transhiatal esophagectomy (RATE).
Between September 2001 and May 2004, 18 patients underwent RATE at the authors' institution. A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed. Gender, age, postoperative diagnosis, operative time, conversion rate, blood loss, hospital stay, length of the follow-up period, and complications were assessed.
At the authors' institution, 18 patients underwent RATE, including 16 men (89%), with a mean age of 54 years (range, 41-73 years). The RATE procedure was completed for all 18 patients (100%). The mean operative time was 267 +/- 71 min, and estimated blood loss was 54 ml (range, 10-150 ml). The mean intensive care unit stay was 1.8 days (range, 1-5 days), and the mean hospital stay was 10 days (range, 4-38 days). A total of 12 perioperative complications occurred for 9 patients, including 6 anastomotic leaks, 1 thoracic duct injury, 1 vocal cord paralysis, 1 pleural effusion, and 2 atrial fibrillations. Anastomotic stricture was observed in six patients. There were no perioperative deaths. Pathologic examination of the surgical specimen yielded an average of 14 lymph nodes per patient (range, 7-27). During the mean follow-up period of 22 +/- 8 months, 2 patients died, 2 were lost to follow-up evaluation, 3 had recurrence, and 11 were disease free.
The current study shows that RATE, with its decreased blood loss, minimal cardiopulmonary complications, and no hospital mortality, represents a safe and effective alternative for the treatment of esophageal adenocarcinoma.
食管切除术是一项技术要求较高的手术,与手术相关的发病率和死亡率都很高。20世纪80年代末引入了微创技术,旨在降低手术的侵袭性。文献中关于使用机器人系统治疗食管癌的数据很少。本报告的目的是描述作者使用机器人辅助技术进行经裂孔食管切除术(RATE)的早期经验。
2001年9月至2004年5月期间,18例患者在作者所在机构接受了RATE手术。对前瞻性收集的数据进行回顾性分析。评估患者的性别、年龄、术后诊断、手术时间、中转率、失血量、住院时间、随访时间以及并发症情况。
在作者所在机构,18例患者接受了RATE手术,其中男性16例(89%),平均年龄54岁(范围41 - 73岁)。18例患者均成功完成了RATE手术(100%)。平均手术时间为267±71分钟,估计失血量为54毫升(范围10 - 150毫升)。平均重症监护病房停留时间为1.8天(范围1 - 5天),平均住院时间为10天(范围4 - 38天)。9例患者共发生12例围手术期并发症,包括6例吻合口漏、1例胸导管损伤、1例声带麻痹、1例胸腔积液和2例房颤。6例患者出现吻合口狭窄。无围手术期死亡病例。手术标本的病理检查显示,每位患者平均有14个淋巴结(范围7 - 27个)。在平均22±8个月的随访期内,2例患者死亡,2例失访,3例复发,11例无疾病复发。
目前的研究表明,RATE手术具有失血量减少、心肺并发症极少且无住院死亡率等优点,是治疗食管腺癌的一种安全有效的替代方法。