Suppr超能文献

大学生多维健康控制点量表的效度与信度

Validity and reliability of the multidimensional health locus of control scale for college students.

作者信息

Moshki Mahdi, Ghofranipour Fazlollah, Hajizadeh Ebrahim, Azadfallah Parviz

机构信息

Dept. Health Education, School of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, I.R. Iran.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2007 Oct 18;7:295. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-295.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the present study was to assess the validity and reliability of Form A of Multidimensional Health Locus of Control scales in Iran. Health locus of control is one of the most widely measured parameters of health belief for the planning of health education programs.

METHODS

496 university students participated in this study. The reliability coefficients were calculated in three different methods: test-retest, parallel forms and Cronbach alpha. In order to survey validity of the scale we used three methods including content validity, concurrent validity and construct validity.

RESULTS

We established the content validity of the Persian translation by translating (and then back-translating) each item from the English version into the Persian version. The concurrent validity of the questionnaire, as measured by Levenson's IPC scale was .57 (P < .001), .49 (P < .01) and .53 (P < .001) for IPC, respectively. Exploratory principal components analysis supported a three-factor structure that items loading adequately on each factor. Moreover, the approximate orthogonal of the dimensions were obtained through correlation analyses. In addition, the reliability results were acceptable, too.

CONCLUSION

The results showed that the reliability and validity of Persian Form A of MHLC was acceptable and respectable and is suggested as an applicable criterion for similar studies in Iran.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估多维健康控制点量表A版在伊朗的有效性和可靠性。健康控制点是健康教育项目规划中测量最广泛的健康信念参数之一。

方法

496名大学生参与了本研究。通过三种不同方法计算信度系数:重测法、平行形式法和克朗巴赫α系数法。为了调查量表的效度,我们使用了三种方法,包括内容效度、同时效度和结构效度。

结果

我们通过将英文版的每个项目翻译成波斯文版本(然后再回译)来确定波斯文翻译的内容效度。问卷的同时效度,通过莱文森的内控性、有势力的他人及机遇量表(IPC)测量,IPC的分别为0.57(P < .001)、0.49(P < .01)和0.53(P < .001)。探索性主成分分析支持了一个三因素结构,各项目在每个因素上的载荷都足够。此外,通过相关分析获得了维度的近似正交性。此外,信度结果也可以接受。

结论

结果表明,MHLC波斯文A版的信度和效度是可以接受和值得认可的,并建议作为伊朗类似研究的适用标准。

相似文献

1
Validity and reliability of the multidimensional health locus of control scale for college students.
BMC Public Health. 2007 Oct 18;7:295. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-295.
2
Validity and reliability of a Persian version of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire.
Psychol Rep. 2009 Apr;104(2):509-16. doi: 10.2466/PR0.104.2.509-516.
3
Translation and Psychometric Testing of the Persian Version of the Spiritual Needs Questionnaire Among Elders With Chronic Diseases.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Jan;55(1):94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.08.024. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
7
Factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Levenson's Locus of Control Scale in Iranian infertile people.
J Health Psychol. 2018 Nov;23(13):1668-1676. doi: 10.1177/1359105316666659. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
9
The functional rating index: reliability and validity of the Persian language version in patients with neck pain.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Jun 15;37(14):E844-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824b5bde.
10
Persian version of the Moorong Self-Efficacy Scale: psychometric study among subjects with physical disability.
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Nov;39(23):2436-2445. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1226404. Epub 2016 Oct 21.

引用本文的文献

2
The Illusory Health Beliefs Scale: validation using exploratory structural equation modeling and multidimensional Rasch analysis.
Front Psychol. 2025 May 7;16:1491759. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1491759. eCollection 2025.
3
First aid self-efficacy: a scale adaptation and psychometric properties.
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 1;25(1):1234. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22486-w.
6
Oral Health-Related Quality of Life, Locus of Control, Self-Reported Oral Health and Oral Health Status among Nursing Students in Moradabad.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2199-S2201. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_97_24. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
8
Psychological well-being and factors affecting it after the COVID-19 pandemic.
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 8;15:1295774. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1295774. eCollection 2024.
9
e-Health Literacy Scale, Patient Attitudes, Medication Adherence, and Internal Locus of Control.
Health Lit Res Pract. 2023 Apr;7(2):e80-e88. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20230417-01. Epub 2023 May 8.

本文引用的文献

1
3
Multidimensional health locus of control: comments on the construct and its measurement.
J Health Psychol. 2005 Sep;10(5):633-42. doi: 10.1177/1359105305055307.
4
The validity of the multidimensional health locus of control scales.
J Health Psychol. 2005 Sep;10(5):623-31. doi: 10.1177/1359105305055304.
6
Multidimensional health locus of control scales: applicability among Ghanaian adolescents.
East Afr Med J. 2002 Mar;79(3):128-33. doi: 10.4314/eamj.v79i3.8890.
7
8
[Validity and reliability of the Children's Health Locus of Control Scale].
Nihon Kango Kagakkaishi. 1997 Jun;17(2):54-61. doi: 10.5630/jans1981.17.2_54.
9
Form C of the MHLC scales: a condition-specific measure of locus of control.
J Pers Assess. 1994 Dec;63(3):534-53. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6303_10.
10
Reliability and validity of the health locus of control scale.
J Pers Assess. 1982 Dec;46(6):614-9. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4606_10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验