Hunter S, Hofmeyr G J, Kulier R
Eastern Cape Department of Health/University of the Witwatersrand/Fort Hare, Effective Care Research Unit, East London, South Africa.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;2007(4):CD001063. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001063.pub3.
Lateral and posterior position of the baby's head (the back of the baby's head facing to the mother's side or back) may be associated with more painful, prolonged or obstructed labour and difficult delivery. It is possible that certain positions adopted by the mother may influence the baby's position.
To assess the effects of adopting a hands and knees maternal posture in late pregnancy or during labour when the presenting part of the fetus is in a lateral or posterior position compared with no intervention.
We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (July 2007) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 2).
Randomised trials of hands and knees maternal posture compared to other postures or controls.
Two review authors assessed trial eligibility and quality.
Three trials (2794 women) were included. In one trial (100 women), four different postures (four groups of 20 women) were combined for the comparison with the control group of 20 women. Lateral or posterior position of the presenting part of the fetus was less likely to persist following 10 minutes in the hands and knees position compared to a sitting position (one trial, 100 women, relative risk (RR) 0.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18 to 0.38). In a second trial (2547 women), advice to assume the hands and knees posture for 10 minutes twice daily in the last weeks of pregnancy had no effect on the baby's position at delivery or any of the other pregnancy outcomes measured. The third trial studied the use of hands and knees position in labour and involved 147 labouring women at 37 or more weeks gestation. Occipito-posterior position of the baby was confirmed by ultrasound. Seventy women, who were randomised in the intervention group, assumed hands and knees positioning for a period of at least 30 minutes, compared to 77 women in the control group who did not assume hands and knees positioning in labour. The reduction in occipito-posterior or -transverse positions at delivery and operative deliveries were not statistically significant. There was a significant reduction in back pain.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Use of hands and knees position for 10 minutes twice daily to correct occipito-posterior position of the fetus in late pregnancy cannot be recommended as an intervention. This is not to suggest that women should not adopt this position if they find it comfortable. The use of position in labour was associated with reduced backache. Further trials are needed to assess the effects on other labour outcomes.
胎儿头部处于侧位和后位(胎儿头部背侧朝向母亲身体侧面或背部)可能与更疼痛、产程延长或受阻以及难产相关。母亲采取的某些姿势可能会影响胎儿的位置。
评估与不干预相比,在妊娠晚期或分娩时当胎儿先露部处于侧位或后位时,母亲采取手膝位姿势的效果。
我们检索了Cochrane妊娠与分娩组试验注册库(2007年7月)以及Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(《Cochrane图书馆》2007年第2期)。
将母亲手膝位姿势与其他姿势或对照进行比较的随机试验。
两位综述作者评估试验的纳入资格和质量。
纳入了三项试验(2794名女性)。在一项试验(100名女性)中,将四种不同姿势(四组,每组20名女性)合并与20名女性的对照组进行比较。与坐位相比,采取手膝位姿势10分钟后,胎儿先露部处于侧位或后位的情况持续存在的可能性较小(一项试验,100名女性,相对危险度(RR)0.26,95%置信区间(CI)0.18至0.38)。在第二项试验(2547名女性)中,建议在妊娠最后几周每天两次采取手膝位姿势10分钟,对分娩时胎儿的位置或所测量的任何其他妊娠结局均无影响。第三项试验研究了分娩时手膝位姿势的使用情况,涉及147名妊娠37周及以上的分娩女性。通过超声确认胎儿为枕后位。干预组的70名女性采取手膝位姿势至少30分钟,而对照组的77名女性在分娩时未采取手膝位姿势。分娩时枕后位或枕横位的减少以及剖宫产率在统计学上无显著差异。背痛有显著减轻。
不建议将每天两次采取手膝位姿势10分钟以纠正妊娠晚期胎儿枕后位作为一种干预措施。这并非意味着如果女性觉得舒适就不应采取这个姿势。分娩时采取该姿势与背痛减轻相关。需要进一步试验来评估对其他分娩结局的影响。