MacKillop James, Mattson Richard E, Anderson Mackillop Emily J, Castelda Bryan A, Donovick Peter J
Department of Psychology, The State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, New York.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007 Nov;68(6):785-8. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2007.68.785.
Alcohol misuse in college students represents a significant public health problem. Toward improving the understanding of determinants of collegiate alcohol misuse, the current study examined several dimensions of impulsivity in relation to hazardous drinking in college students.
A one-way, two-group, cross-sectional design was used to compare hazardous drinkers (HZD) with social drinkers (SOC). HZD drinkers were required to score 6 or more on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT); SOC drinkers were required to score 1-5 on the AUDIT. The sample comprised 93 participants (56% HZD; 76% male) who were recruited from a medium-sized public university. Participants were assessed under neutral conditions using the Eysenck Impulsivity Questionnaire (EIQ), Delay Discounting Task (DDT), and Stanford Time Perspective Inventory (STPI).
Consistent with predictions, HZD participants exhibited significantly greater impulsivity on the EIQ-Impulsivity subscale (p < .001), the STPI-Present Hedonism subscale (p < .01), and the STPIFuture subscale (p < .01); however, no differences were evident on the DDT (p > .40). The HZD group also scored marginally higher than the SOC group on the EIQ-Venturesomeness subscale (p < .10).
These findings suggest that greater impulsivity is associated with alcohol misuse in college students, most prominently in the area of propensity toward risk-taking and nonplanning (EIQ-Impulsivity subscale). The correspondence between these findings and previous studies, methodological considerations, and the need for prospective studies on impulsivity and alcohol misuse in college students are discussed.
大学生酒精滥用是一个重大的公共卫生问题。为了更好地理解大学生酒精滥用的决定因素,本研究考察了冲动性的几个维度与大学生危险饮酒之间的关系。
采用单向、两组横断面设计,比较危险饮酒者(HZD)和社交饮酒者(SOC)。危险饮酒者在酒精使用障碍识别测试(AUDIT)中的得分需为6分或更高;社交饮酒者在AUDIT中的得分需为1 - 5分。样本包括93名参与者(56%为HZD;76%为男性),他们来自一所中型公立大学。参与者在中性条件下使用艾森克冲动性问卷(EIQ)、延迟折扣任务(DDT)和斯坦福时间观点问卷(STPI)进行评估。
与预测一致,HZD参与者在EIQ冲动性分量表(p < .001)、STPI当前享乐主义分量表(p < .01)和STPI未来分量表(p < .01)上表现出显著更高的冲动性;然而,在DDT上没有明显差异(p > .40)。HZD组在EIQ冒险性分量表上的得分也略高于SOC组(p < .10)。
这些发现表明,更高的冲动性与大学生酒精滥用有关,最明显的是在冒险倾向和无计划性方面(EIQ冲动性分量表)。讨论了这些发现与先前研究的对应关系、方法学考虑因素以及对大学生冲动性和酒精滥用进行前瞻性研究的必要性。