Zou G Y, Donner A
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ont., Canada N6A 5C1.
Stat Med. 2008 May 10;27(10):1693-702. doi: 10.1002/sim.3095.
It is widely accepted that confidence interval construction has important advantages over significance testing for the presentation of research results, as now facilitated by readily available software. However, for a number of effect measures, procedures are either not available or not satisfactory in samples of small to moderate size. In this paper, we describe a general approach for estimating a difference between effect measures, which can also be used to obtain confidence limits for a risk ratio and a lognormal mean. Numerical evaluation shows that this closed-form procedure outperforms existing methods, including the bootstrap.
人们普遍认为,对于研究结果的呈现,置信区间构建相较于显著性检验具有重要优势,如今借助易于获取的软件,这一过程变得更加便捷。然而,对于一些效应量度而言,在小到中等规模的样本中,相关程序要么不可用,要么不尽人意。在本文中,我们描述了一种估计效应量度之间差异的通用方法,该方法也可用于获取风险比和对数正态均值的置信限。数值评估表明,这种封闭式程序优于现有方法,包括自助法。