Wilson Scott T, Stanley Barbara, Oquendo Maria A, Goldberg Pablo, Zalsman Gil, Mann J John
Department of Neuroscience, New York State Psychiatric Institute, NY 10032, USA.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2007 Oct;68(10):1533-9. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v68n1010.
To determine whether borderline personality disorder (BPD) and bipolar II disorder can be differentiated from each other and from major depressive disorder (MDD) by comparing depression severity, impulsiveness, and hostility in mood disorder patients with and without BPD.
One hundred seventy-three patients with either MDD or bipolar II disorder were enrolled from a larger sample admitted to a multisite project on mood disorders and suicidal behavior conducted from June 1996 through June 2006. Patients were divided into 4 groups: MDD with BPD, MDD without an Axis II diagnosis, bipolar II disorder with BPD, and bipolar II disorder without an Axis II diagnosis. All diagnoses were based on DSM-IV criteria. Depression was assessed using the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) and the self-rated Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Impulsiveness was assessed using the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale, and hostility was assessed using the Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory.
Patients with BPD reported higher levels of impulsiveness (p = .004) and hostility (p = .001), independent of Axis I diagnosis. Bipolar II patients reported greater attentional impulsiveness (p = .008) than MDD patients, independent of BPD status, while BPD patients reported greater nonplanning impulsiveness than patients without BPD, independent of Axis I diagnosis (p = .02). For motor impulsiveness, there was a main effect for Axis I diagnosis (p = .05) and Axis II diagnosis (p = .002). The bipolar II + BPD group scored the highest, suggesting a compound effect of comorbidity. There were no differences in depression severity when measured with the HAM-D, although the BPD groups reported more severe depression on the BDI, independent of their Axis I diagnosis (p = .05). The BPD groups scored higher on the cognitive factor (p = .01) and anxiety factor (p = .03) of the HAM-D.
Results suggest that there is a unique symptom and trait profile associated with BPD that distinguishes the diagnosis from bipolar II disorder. Results also suggest that impulsiveness is an important aspect of both disorders and that there is a compounding effect associated with a diagnosis of bipolar II disorder with comorbid BPD.
通过比较伴有或不伴有边缘型人格障碍(BPD)的心境障碍患者的抑郁严重程度、冲动性和敌意,来确定边缘型人格障碍和双相II型障碍是否能彼此区分,以及能否与重度抑郁症(MDD)区分开来。
从1996年6月至2006年6月进行的一项关于心境障碍和自杀行为的多中心项目所纳入的较大样本中,选取了173例患有重度抑郁症或双相II型障碍的患者。患者被分为4组:伴有BPD的MDD、无轴II诊断的MDD、伴有BPD的双相II型障碍和无轴II诊断的双相II型障碍。所有诊断均基于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)标准。使用17项汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HAM-D)和自评贝克抑郁量表(BDI)评估抑郁情况。使用巴拉特冲动性量表评估冲动性,使用布斯-杜克敌意量表评估敌意。
无论轴I诊断如何,患有BPD的患者报告的冲动性水平更高(p = 0.004)和敌意水平更高(p = 0.001)。双相II型患者报告的注意力冲动性比MDD患者更高(p = 0.008),与BPD状态无关,而BPD患者报告的非计划性冲动性比无BPD的患者更高,与轴I诊断无关(p = 0.02)。对于运动冲动性,轴I诊断(p = 0.05)和轴II诊断(p = 0.002)有主效应。双相II + BPD组得分最高,表明存在共病的复合效应。使用HAM-D测量时,抑郁严重程度没有差异,尽管BPD组在BDI上报告的抑郁更严重,与他们的轴I诊断无关(p = 0.05)。BPD组在HAM-D的认知因子(p = 0.01)和焦虑因子(p = 0.03)上得分更高。
结果表明,存在与BPD相关的独特症状和特征谱,可将该诊断与双相II型障碍区分开来。结果还表明,冲动性是这两种障碍的一个重要方面,并且双相II型障碍合并BPD的诊断存在复合效应。