Randrianasolo Laurence, Tafangy Philémon B, Raharimalala Lucie A, Ratsimbasoa Arsène C, Randriamanantena Arthur, Randrianarivelojosia Milijaona
Institut Pasteur de Madagascar, BP 1274, Antananarivo (101), Madagascar.
Sante. 2007 Apr-Jun;17(2):69-73.
This study was conducted in 2003 as part of the training of laboratory technicians in the use of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for malaria and to evaluate these tests in Madagascar in field conditions for the first time. Two types of RDT were used separately. The dipstick (Optimal-I) that detects circulating pLDH was tested in 168 patients with clinically suspected malaria (fever or recent history of fever) at primary health centers. Microscopy confirmed malaria in 93/168 (55.4%) cases. Monoparasitic P. falciparum infection was identified in 86/93, P. malariae in 3/93, P. vivax in 3/93 and P. ovale in 1/93. A positive Optimal-I test was a highly sensitive indicator of P. falciparum infection with parasitemia exceeding 500 trophozoites/mul (sensitivity of 97.2%; with a specificity of 100%); it also confirmed 6/7 cases of non-P. falciparum malaria. A community malaria survey used the Malaria Hexagon dipstick (detecting P. falciparum-specific HRP2) for 273 patients: 17 (6.2%) RDT tests were positive, and 16 (5.9%) microscopic tests. Although this dipstick did not detect the only case of infection with P. vivax, its specificity was 100% for detection of P. falciparum infection. Installing microscopes and qualified microscopists in the health centers of the one hundred and eleven districts in Madagascar would be extremely difficult, but our results show that RDT is an effective alternative diagnostic tool for daily use as well as for sporadic malaria epidemics. The revised antimalarial treatment policy, involving a drug ten to twenty times more expensive than chloroquine, demonstrates the need to improve malaria diagnosis: presumptive treatment has become prohibitively expensive. RDT can be used to improve malaria case management at the primary heath centers in Madagascar. We discuss the choice of RDTs.
本研究于2003年开展,作为实验室技术人员使用疟疾快速诊断检测(RDT)培训的一部分,并首次在马达加斯加的实地条件下对这些检测进行评估。两种类型的RDT被分别使用。在初级卫生中心,对168例临床疑似疟疾(发热或近期发热史)患者使用检测循环中pLDH的试纸条(Optimal-I)进行检测。显微镜检查确诊93/168(55.4%)例为疟疾。在93例中,86例为恶性疟原虫单寄生虫感染,3例为三日疟原虫,3例为间日疟原虫,1例为卵形疟原虫。Optimal-I检测呈阳性是疟原虫血症超过500个滋养体/μl的恶性疟原虫感染的高度敏感指标(敏感性为97.2%;特异性为100%);它还确诊了6/7例非恶性疟原虫疟疾。一项社区疟疾调查对273例患者使用了疟疾六边形试纸条(检测恶性疟原虫特异性HRP2):17例(6.2%)RDT检测呈阳性,16例(5.9%)显微镜检查呈阳性。虽然该试纸条未检测出唯一1例间日疟原虫感染病例,但其检测恶性疟原虫感染的特异性为100%。在马达加斯加111个区的卫生中心配备显微镜和合格的显微镜检查人员极其困难,但我们的结果表明,RDT是日常使用以及散发性疟疾疫情的一种有效的替代诊断工具。修订后的抗疟治疗政策涉及一种比氯喹贵10至20倍的药物,这表明需要改进疟疾诊断:推定治疗已变得极其昂贵。RDT可用于改善马达加斯加初级卫生中心的疟疾病例管理。我们讨论了RDT的选择。