Wang Ching S, Arnold Roland R, Trope Martin, Teixeira Fabricio B
Department of Endodontics, University of North Carolina School of Dentistry, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA.
J Endod. 2007 Nov;33(11):1283-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.07.010.
This study evaluated the clinical efficacy of 2% chlorhexidine (CHX) gel on intracanal bacteria reduction during root canal instrumentation. The additional antibacterial effect of an intracanal dressing (CaOH mixed with 2% CHX gel) was also assessed. Forty-three patients with apical periodontitis were recruited. Four patients with irreversible pulpitis were included as negative controls. Teeth were instrumented using rotary instruments and 2% CHX gel as the disinfectant. Bacterial samples were taken upon access (S1), after instrumentation (S2), and after 2 weeks of intracanal dressing (S3). Anaerobic culture was performed. Four samples showed no bacteria growth at S1, which were excluded from further analysis. Of the samples cultured positively at S1, 10.3% (4/39) and 8.3% (4/36) sampled bacteria at S2 and S3, respectively. A significant difference in the percentage of positive culture between S1 and S2 (p < 0.001) but not between S2 and S3 (p = 0.692) was found. These results suggest that 2% CHX gel is an effective root canal disinfectant and additional intracanal dressing did not significantly improve the bacteria reduction on the sampled root canals.
本研究评估了2%氯己定(CHX)凝胶在根管预备过程中减少根管内细菌的临床疗效。还评估了根管内敷料(氢氧化钙与2% CHX凝胶混合)的额外抗菌效果。招募了43例根尖周炎患者。纳入4例不可逆性牙髓炎患者作为阴性对照。使用旋转器械和2% CHX凝胶作为消毒剂对牙齿进行预备。在开髓时(S1)、预备后(S2)以及根管内敷料放置2周后(S3)采集细菌样本。进行厌氧培养。4个样本在S1时未显示细菌生长,将其排除在进一步分析之外。在S1时培养阳性的样本中,分别有10.3%(4/39)和8.3%(4/36)在S2和S3时采集到细菌。发现S1和S2之间阳性培养百分比有显著差异(p < 0.001),但S2和S3之间无显著差异(p = 0.692)。这些结果表明,2% CHX凝胶是一种有效的根管消毒剂,额外的根管内敷料并未显著提高所采样根管内的细菌减少率。