Laboratoire IRISSE, UFR Des Sciences de l'Homme Et de l'Environnement, Université de La Réunion, La Réunion, France.
School of Physiotherapy (IFMK de la Réunion), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de La Réunion, Reunion, France.
J Man Manip Ther. 2022 Jun;30(3):192-198. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2021.2024676. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
There are limited reports about the reliability of measuring neck extensor muscle strength using a portable dynamometer in neck pain patients. The aims of the current study were 1) to investigate intra- and inter-rater reliability of neck extensor isometric strength measurement using a portable dynamometer in patients with chronic nonspecific neck pain (CNSNP) and 2) to compare neck extensor isometric strength in participants with and without CNSNP.
Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were followed. Two examiners received a 15-minute training before enrollment. Inter-rater reliability was assessed with a 10-minute interval between measurements, and intra-rater reliability was assessed with a 10-day interval. Three trials were assessed and examiners were blind to the strength values (in Newtons) from other sessions of 20 individuals with CNSNP (mean±SD= 37.9 ± 9.8y; Neck Disability Index 29.2 ± 7.4%) and 20 individuals with other musculoskeletal disorders (mean ± SD = 32.8 ± 46.2y).
Intra-rater reliability was excellent with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)(3,1) of 0.95 (CI:0.90-0.97) and inter-rater reliability was good to excellent with ICC(2,1) of 0.88 (CI:0.77-0.94) in CNSNP. No significant difference of neck extensor strength was found between CNSNP (93.27N±31.94) and Individuals without CNSNP (111.43N±40.11) (p > 0.05).
A portable dynamometer is a reliable tool for measuring maximal isometric neck extension strength in individuals with CNSNP. Slightly but no significant differences of neck extensor strength values between individuals with and without CNSNP. Future studies are needed to assess the generalizability of the findings in patients with other muscle deconditioning.
使用便携式测力计测量颈部伸肌力量在颈部疼痛患者中的可靠性的相关报告有限。本研究的目的是 1)探讨慢性非特异性颈部疼痛(CNSNP)患者使用便携式测力计进行颈部伸肌等长力量测量的内部和外部可靠性,2)比较 CNSNP 患者与无 CNSNP 患者的颈部伸肌等长力量。
遵循可靠性和一致性研究报告指南(GRRAS)。在纳入前,两位检查者接受了 15 分钟的培训。使用 10 分钟的测量间隔评估了外部可靠性,使用 10 天的间隔评估了内部可靠性。评估了三个试验,检查者对 CNSNP 患者(20 人,平均±标准差=37.9±9.8 岁;颈部残疾指数 29.2±7.4%)和其他肌肉骨骼疾病患者(20 人,平均±标准差=32.8±46.2 岁)的其他测试中的力量值(以牛顿为单位)保持盲态。
CNSNP 患者的内部可靠性非常好,组内相关系数(ICC)(3,1)为 0.95(置信区间:0.90-0.97),外部可靠性为良好至非常好,ICC(2,1)为 0.88(置信区间:0.77-0.94)。CNSNP 患者的颈部伸肌力量与无 CNSNP 患者(93.27N±31.94)无显著差异(111.43N±40.11)(p>0.05)。
便携式测力计是测量 CNSNP 患者最大等长颈部伸展力量的可靠工具。CNSNP 患者与无 CNSNP 患者的颈部伸肌力量值差异很小,但无统计学意义。需要进一步的研究来评估这些发现在其他肌肉功能不全患者中的普遍性。