Ravaglia Sabrina, Piccolo Giovanni, Ceroni Mauro, Franciotta Diego, Pichiecchio Anna, Bastianello Stefano, Tavazzi Eleonora, Minoli Lorenzo, Marchioni Enrico
Institute of Neurology C. Mondino, Pavia, Italy.
J Neurol. 2007 Nov;254(11):1518-23. doi: 10.1007/s00415-007-0561-4. Epub 2007 Nov 14.
Based on their presumed immuno-mediated etiology, post-infectious CNS disorders are commonly treated with high-dose steroids. Factors influencing treatment effectiveness, possible alternative options for steroid-resistant cases, and their outcome profiles, remain unclear. We here describe the clinical features, the prognosis and the efficacy of i. v. immunoglobulins (IVIg) in a series of severe ADEM refractory to steroids. We performed an inception cohort study on inpatients of the Neurologic and Infectious Disease Clinics, consecutively admitted over eight years, with a minimum two-year follow-up. Nineteen patients affected by classic and site-restricted ADEM were treated with IVIg after steroid failure. Five other patients received IVIg as first-line treatment due to steroids contraindications: although not included in the analysis, they were monitored for anecdotal comparison. Steroids were administered as IV 6-methylprednisolone (6-MP) 500/1000 mg daily until a maximum dose of 6-8 g; IVIg were administered at 0.4 g/kg/day for 5 days. The outcome was assessed by the Scripps Neurological Rating Scale (SNRS) score with determined periodicity. We observed that steroid-resistant patients showed high prevalence of PNS damage (89%) and myelitis (95 %). Other features were old age, severe disability at onset, and moderate to severe blood-brain-barrier (BBB) damage on CSF. In 10/19 patients (53 %) IVIg were effective, the clinical improvement beginning within the end of the five-day cycle,without relapses. Prominent effects of IVIg were detectable on motor dysfunction. Milder onset disability (p = 0.013) and lower CSF albumin (p = 0.006) were the predictors of IVIg response. Among steroid-free patients, 3/5 were responsive to IVIg. We conclude that IVIg can be useful in a portion of patients with severe steroid-resistant ADEM and prominent motor dysfunction. Unsolved issues regard the usefulness of IVIg in less selected groups, and the spectrum of their clinical effects.
基于其假定的免疫介导病因,感染后中枢神经系统疾病通常采用大剂量类固醇治疗。影响治疗效果的因素、类固醇抵抗病例可能的替代选择及其预后情况仍不清楚。我们在此描述静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIg)在一系列对类固醇难治的严重急性播散性脑脊髓炎(ADEM)中的临床特征、预后和疗效。我们对神经科和传染病科连续八年收治的住院患者进行了一项起始队列研究,随访至少两年。19例患有典型和局限性ADEM的患者在类固醇治疗失败后接受了IVIg治疗。另外5例患者因类固醇禁忌而接受IVIg作为一线治疗:尽管未纳入分析,但对其进行了观察以作对比。类固醇以静脉注射6-甲基泼尼松龙(6-MP)每日500/1000毫克给药,直至最大剂量6-8克;IVIg以0.4克/千克/天给药,共5天。通过斯克里普斯神经评分量表(SNRS)评分定期评估结果。我们观察到,类固醇抵抗患者周围神经系统损伤(89%)和脊髓炎(95%)的患病率较高。其他特征包括年龄较大、起病时严重残疾以及脑脊液检查显示中度至重度血脑屏障(BBB)损伤。19例患者中有10例(53%)IVIg治疗有效,临床改善在五天疗程结束时开始,且无复发。IVIg对运动功能障碍有显著效果。起病时残疾较轻(p = 0.013)和脑脊液白蛋白较低(p = 0.006)是IVIg反应的预测因素。在未使用类固醇的患者中,5例中有3例对IVIg有反应。我们得出结论,IVIg对部分患有严重类固醇抵抗性ADEM且运动功能障碍突出的患者可能有用。未解决的问题包括IVIg在选择范围较窄的群体中的有用性及其临床效果谱。