Jia Chunrong, Batterman Stuart, Godwin Christopher
Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, USA.
J Environ Monit. 2007 Nov;9(11):1220-30. doi: 10.1039/b708119g. Epub 2007 Aug 23.
Long sampling periods are often advantageous or required for measuring air quality and characterizing exposures. However, sampling periods exceeding 8 to 24 h using thermally desorbable adsorbent tube (TDT) samplers for the measurement of airborne volatile organic compounds (VOCs) face several challenges, including maintaining stable and low flow rates, and avoiding breakthrough of the adsorbent. These problems may be avoided using intermittent sampling; however, the literature contains few if any reports that have evaluated this technique in environmental, occupational or other applications. The purpose of this study is to evaluate continuous, intermittent and passive sampling methods using both laboratory and real-world tests. Laboratory tests compared continuous and intermittent (active) samplers in a controlled dynamic test gas generation system. Field tests used side-by-side active and passive samplers in an office, home workshop and four smokers' homes. All samples were analyzed for a wide range of VOCs by GC-MS. In most instances, intermittent sampling yielded better reproducibility (duplicate precision of 10 +/- 6%) than continuous low-flow sampling (18 +/- 5%), in part due to difficulty maintaining low flows. Concentrations obtained using intermittent sampling agreed with those for continuous sampling, with downward biases resulting primarily from errors in flow rate measurements. In the field, more VOC species were detected using active rather than passive sampling. Passive measurements were 12% lower than continuous measurements, a difference attributed to declining uptake rates at higher concentrations over the 3 to 4 d sampling period. Overall, most measurements obtained using the three sampling methods agreed within 20% for a wide range of concentrations (0.1 to 230 microg m(-3)). Both passive and intermittent sampling approaches are suitable for long sampling periods, but intermittent sampling provides greater flexibility with respect to sampling period, and permits the use of multi-bed adsorbents that can capture a wider range of VOCs.
在测量空气质量和描述暴露情况时,较长的采样周期通常是有利的或必要的。然而,使用热脱附吸附管(TDT)采样器测量空气中挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)时,采样周期超过8至24小时会面临几个挑战,包括维持稳定且低的流速以及避免吸附剂穿透。使用间歇采样可以避免这些问题;然而,文献中几乎没有评估该技术在环境、职业或其他应用中的报告。本研究的目的是通过实验室和实际测试来评估连续、间歇和被动采样方法。实验室测试在受控的动态测试气体生成系统中比较了连续和间歇(主动)采样器。现场测试在办公室、家庭作坊和四个吸烟者家中并排使用主动和被动采样器。所有样品均通过气相色谱 - 质谱联用仪(GC-MS)分析了多种VOCs。在大多数情况下;间歇采样产生的重现性(重复精密度为10±6%)优于连续低流量采样(18±5%),部分原因是维持低流量存在困难。间歇采样获得的浓度与连续采样的浓度一致,向下偏差主要源于流速测量误差。在现场,主动采样比被动采样检测到更多的VOC种类。被动测量值比连续测量值低12%,这一差异归因于在3至4天的采样期内,较高浓度下吸收速率下降。总体而言,对于广泛的浓度范围(0.1至230μg m⁻³),使用三种采样方法获得的大多数测量值在20%以内相符。被动和间歇采样方法均适用于长时间采样,但间歇采样在采样周期方面提供了更大的灵活性,并允许使用能够捕获更广泛VOCs范围的多床吸附剂。