Suppr超能文献

急诊科使用丙泊酚进行程序性镇静:安全吗?

Emergency department procedural sedation with propofol: is it safe?

作者信息

Weaver Christopher S, Hauter William E, Brizendine Edward J, Cordell William H

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA.

出版信息

J Emerg Med. 2007 Nov;33(4):355-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.03.014. Epub 2007 Jul 31.

Abstract

Propofol is a sedative agent gaining popularity for Emergency Department Procedural Sedation (EDPS). However, some institutions across the country continue to restrict the use of propofol secondary to safety concerns. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the complication rate of EDPS with propofol. We conducted a prospective, observational, multi-center study of EDPS patients aged > or = 18 years, consenting to procedural sedation with propofol. Eighty-two patients from two Level I trauma centers were enrolled between August 1, 2002 and January 31, 2003. Transient hypoxemia was the only noted sedation complication. Nine patients (11%) had brief hypoxemia. The combined average hypoxemia time was 1.2 min (SD 0.4), and in all instances responded to simple airway maneuvers or increased oxygen concentration. No patient required advanced airway maneuvers such as intubation or even positive pressure ventilation. EDPS with propofol seems to be safe in our population.

摘要

丙泊酚是一种在急诊科程序镇静(EDPS)中越来越受欢迎的镇静剂。然而,全国各地的一些机构出于安全考虑,继续限制丙泊酚的使用。我们研究的目的是评估丙泊酚用于EDPS的并发症发生率。我们对年龄≥18岁、同意接受丙泊酚程序镇静的EDPS患者进行了一项前瞻性、观察性、多中心研究。2002年8月1日至2003年1月31日期间,来自两个一级创伤中心的82名患者入组。短暂性低氧血症是唯一记录到的镇静并发症。9名患者(11%)出现短暂性低氧血症。低氧血症的平均总时长为1.2分钟(标准差0.4),所有病例均对简单气道操作或增加氧浓度有反应。没有患者需要进行如插管或甚至正压通气等高级气道操作。在我们的研究人群中,丙泊酚用于EDPS似乎是安全的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验