• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

兴趣与新生儿:这个故事比我们明确承认的要复杂得多。

Interests and neonates: there is more to the story than we explicitly acknowledge.

作者信息

Hester D Micah

机构信息

Division of Medical Humanities, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham St., #646, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA.

出版信息

Theor Med Bioeth. 2007;28(5):357-72. doi: 10.1007/s11017-007-9048-7.

DOI:10.1007/s11017-007-9048-7
PMID:17985107
Abstract

Although there are many different moral arguments concerning the use of Best Interests in neonatal decision-making, there seems in practice a firm commitment to application of the concept. And yet, there is still little reflection given by practitioners about what employing a Best Interest determination means in infant care. The following lays out a comprehensive taxonomy of interest-sources in order to provide for more robust considerations of what constitutes best interests of/for neonates.

摘要

尽管在新生儿决策中使用“最佳利益”存在许多不同的道德争议,但在实践中似乎对该概念的应用有着坚定的承诺。然而,从业者对于在婴儿护理中运用“最佳利益”判定意味着什么仍很少进行思考。以下列出了一个全面的利益来源分类法,以便更深入地思考什么构成了新生儿的最佳利益。

相似文献

1
Interests and neonates: there is more to the story than we explicitly acknowledge.兴趣与新生儿:这个故事比我们明确承认的要复杂得多。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2007;28(5):357-72. doi: 10.1007/s11017-007-9048-7.
2
Using a new analysis of the best interests standard to address cultural disputes: whose data, which values?
Theor Med Bioeth. 2007;28(5):373-91. doi: 10.1007/s11017-007-9050-0.
3
Quality-of-life considerations in substitute decision-making for severely disabled neonates: the problem of developing awareness.严重残疾新生儿替代决策中的生活质量考虑因素:意识发展问题。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2009;30(5):351-66. doi: 10.1007/s11017-009-9119-z.
4
The best interest principle as a standard for decision making in the care of neonates.
J Adv Nurs. 2000 Jun;31(6):1286-92. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01402.x.
5
The moral status of the newborn and its implications for medical decision making.新生儿的道德地位及其对医疗决策的影响。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2007;28(5):349-55. doi: 10.1007/s11017-007-9045-x.
6
Parental authority and pediatric bioethical decision making.父母权威与儿科生物伦理决策
J Med Philos. 2010 Oct;35(5):553-72. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhq043. Epub 2010 Sep 16.
7
Harm is all you need? Best interests and disputes about parental decision-making.你只需要伤害?儿童最大利益与关于父母决策的争议。
J Med Ethics. 2016 Feb;42(2):111-5. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-102893. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
8
Ethical Problems in Decision Making in the Neonatal ICU.新生儿重症监护病房决策中的伦理问题
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 8;379(19):1851-1860. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1801063.
9
Procreative reasons-relevance: on the moral significance of why we have children.生育原因的相关性:论我们生育孩子背后的道德意义。
Bioethics. 2009 Jun;23(5):291-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00656.x. Epub 2008 Apr 25.
10
Moral dilemmas in neonatology as experienced by health care practitioners: a qualitative approach.医疗从业者所经历的新生儿科道德困境:一种定性研究方法。
Med Health Care Philos. 2006;9(3):339-47. doi: 10.1007/s11019-005-5641-6.

引用本文的文献

1
The theorisation of 'best interests' in bioethical accounts of decision-making.论生物伦理决策中“最佳利益”的理论化。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Jun 1;22(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00636-0.
2
The Extremely Preterm Infant: Ethical Considerations in Life-and-Death Decision-Making.极早产儿:生死决策中的伦理考量
Front Pediatr. 2020 Feb 26;8:55. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00055. eCollection 2020.
3
International variations in application of the best-interest standard across the age spectrum.最佳利益标准在不同年龄段的应用中的国际差异。

本文引用的文献

1
Rejecting the Baby Doe rules and defending a "negative" analysis of the Best Interests Standard.拒绝《婴儿多伊规则》并为对“最佳利益标准”的“否定性”分析进行辩护。
J Med Philos. 2005 Aug;30(4):331-52. doi: 10.1080/03605310591008487.
2
Parental refusals of medical treatment: the harm principle as threshold for state intervention.父母拒绝医疗救治:伤害原则作为国家干预的门槛
Theor Med Bioeth. 2004;25(4):243-64. doi: 10.1007/s11017-004-3146-6.
3
Health care decisionmaking by children. Is it in their best interest?儿童的医疗保健决策。这符合他们的最大利益吗?
J Perinatol. 2017 Feb;37(2):208-213. doi: 10.1038/jp.2016.168. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
4
Harm is all you need? Best interests and disputes about parental decision-making.你只需要伤害?儿童最大利益与关于父母决策的争议。
J Med Ethics. 2016 Feb;42(2):111-5. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-102893. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
5
Deciding for a child: a comprehensive analysis of the best interest standard.为孩子做决定:最佳利益标准的综合分析。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2012 Jun;33(3):179-98. doi: 10.1007/s11017-012-9219-z.
6
Living with a crucial decision: a qualitative study of parental narratives three years after the loss of their newborn in the NICU.与关键决策共存:新生儿重症监护病房失去新生儿 3 年后的父母叙述定性研究。
PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28633. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028633. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
Hastings Cent Rep. 1997 Nov-Dec;27(6):41-5.
4
The best-interests standard as threshold, ideal, and standard of reasonableness.作为门槛、理想及合理性标准的最佳利益标准。
J Med Philos. 1997 Jun;22(3):271-89. doi: 10.1093/jmp/22.3.271.