Welch Garry, Schwartz Carolyn E, Santiago-Kelly Paula, Garb Jane, Shayne Rebecca, Bode Rita
Behavioral Medicine Research, Baystate Medical Center, 140 High Street, Room 2104, Springfield, MA 01199, USA.
Ethn Dis. 2007 Summer;17(3):541-7.
Diabetes is a serious chronic illness that disproportionately affects prevalence and comorbidity rates among Hispanic populations. Little comparative research has been conducted on the emotional distress experienced by Hispanic patients living with type 2 diabetes.
[corrected] To conduct a psychometric examination of an established measure of emotional distress specific to diabetes and to use this tool to examine levels and predictors of distress in a comparative study of Hispanic and non-Hispanic type 2 diabetes patients.
Psychometric analyses were conducted (skewness, kurtosis, differential item function (DIF), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), internal consistency reliability) to examine the equivalence of U.S. English and U.S. Spanish language versions of a measure of diabetes-related distress (Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID). Regression modeling was used to evaluate differences in distress by ethnic group, after adjusting for blood glucose control, sex, age, education, physical functioning, mental health functioning, and spirituality. Psychometric results showed that PAID had high reliability (alpha = 0.96). Skewness, kurtosis, and DIF were not present. CFA identified a large general factor, supporting use of the total PAID score. Univariate analyses found a significantly higher mean PAID score for Hispanic patients compared to non-Hispanic (45.9 +/- 28.5 vs. 35.9 +/- 26.4). A final regression model based on age, physical functioning, and mental functioning accounted for approximately 50% of PAID variance.
Our findings supported the reliability and unidimensionality of the U.S. Spanish and U.S. English PAID versions for comparative research. Compared to non-Hispanic patients, Hispanic patients reported higher distress, which was substantially predicted from age and physical and mental functioning.
糖尿病是一种严重的慢性疾病,在西班牙裔人群中的患病率和合并症发生率尤其高。针对患有2型糖尿病的西班牙裔患者所经历的情绪困扰,很少有比较性研究。
对一种既定的糖尿病特异性情绪困扰测量方法进行心理测量学检验,并在一项针对西班牙裔和非西班牙裔2型糖尿病患者的比较研究中,使用该工具来检验困扰水平及预测因素。
进行心理测量学分析(偏度、峰度、项目差异功能分析(DIF)、验证性因素分析(CFA)、内部一致性信度),以检验糖尿病相关困扰测量工具(糖尿病问题领域(PAID))的美国英语版和美国西班牙语版的等效性。在调整血糖控制、性别、年龄、教育程度、身体功能、心理健康功能和精神信仰后,使用回归模型评估不同种族群体在困扰方面的差异。心理测量学结果显示,PAID具有较高的信度(α = 0.96)。不存在偏度、峰度和项目差异功能。验证性因素分析确定了一个较大的一般因素,支持使用PAID总分。单因素分析发现,与非西班牙裔患者相比,西班牙裔患者的PAID平均得分显著更高(45.9 ± 28.5对35.9 ± 26.4)。基于年龄、身体功能和心理功能的最终回归模型解释了PAID方差的约50%。
我们的研究结果支持美国西班牙语版和美国英语版PAID在比较研究中的信度和单维性。与非西班牙裔患者相比,西班牙裔患者报告的困扰更高,这在很大程度上可由年龄以及身体和心理功能预测。