Siebert U, Wollnik F
Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, FRG.
Physiol Behav. 1991 Dec;50(6):1137-43. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(91)90574-8.
Wheel-running activity patterns were studied in two inbred rat strains (ACI/Ztm and LEW/Ztm) under 24-h light-dark cycles with various photoperiods. The ACI strain was characterized by a unimodal activity pattern, whereas the LEW strain exhibited a multimodal activity pattern consisting of two activity bouts about 3-5 h apart. Harmonic spectral analyses and chi square periodograms revealed strain-specific differences in the characteristic rhythmic components of the activity pattern. The ACI strain showed only a strong 24-h rhythm, whereas the LEW strain showed additional rhythmic components with periods of 6, 4.8, and 4 h. Except in very young rats, these strain specific patterns were not affected by an experimental lengthening of the dark period. However, differences between the two strains were found in the free-running period and in the mode of entrainment. Our results indicate that the multimodal activity pattern of the LEW strain is not due to an ultradian bout oscillator, instead it may be the result of a unique coupling of multiple circadian oscillators.
在不同光周期的24小时明暗循环条件下,对两个近交系大鼠品系(ACI/Ztm和LEW/Ztm)的转轮活动模式进行了研究。ACI品系的特点是单峰活动模式,而LEW品系表现出多峰活动模式,由两个间隔约3 - 5小时的活动时段组成。谐波频谱分析和卡方周期图揭示了活动模式特征节律成分中的品系特异性差异。ACI品系仅表现出强烈的24小时节律,而LEW品系还表现出周期为6小时、4.8小时和4小时的额外节律成分。除了非常年幼的大鼠外,这些品系特异性模式不受黑暗期实验性延长的影响。然而,在自由运行周期和同步模式方面发现了两个品系之间的差异。我们的结果表明,LEW品系的多峰活动模式并非由于超日节律发作振荡器,相反,它可能是多个昼夜节律振荡器独特耦合的结果。