Martró Elisa, González Victoria, Buckton Andrew J, Saludes Verónica, Fernández Gema, Matas Lurdes, Planas Ramón, Ausina Vicenç
Microbiology Department, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Ctra de Canyet, s/n. 08916 Badalona, Spain.
J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Jan;46(1):192-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01623-07. Epub 2007 Nov 7.
We report the evaluation of a new real-time PCR assay for hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotyping. The assay design is such that genotype 1 isolates are typed by amplification targeting the nonstructural 5b (NS5b) subgenomic region. Non-genotype 1 isolates are typed by type-specific amplicon detection in the 5' noncoding region (5'NC) (method 1; HCV genotyping analyte-specific reagent assay). This method was compared with 5'NC reverse hybridization (method 2; InnoLiPA HCV II) and 5'NC sequencing (method 3; Trugene HCV 5'NC). Two hundred ninety-five sera were tested by method 1; 223 of them were also typed by method 2 and 89 by method 3. Sequencing and phylogenetic analysis of an NS5b fragment were used to resolve discrepant results. Suspected multiple-genotype infections were confirmed by PCR cloning and pyrosequencing. Even though a 2% rate of indeterminates was obtained with method 1, concordance at the genotype level with results with methods 2 and 3 was high. Among eight discordant results, five mixed infections were confirmed. Genotype 1 subtyping efficiencies were 100%, 77%, and 74% for methods 1, 2, and 3, respectively; there were 11/101 discordants between methods 1 and 2 (method 1 was predominantly correct) and 2/34 between methods 2 and 3. Regarding genotype 2, subtyping efficiencies were 100%, 45%, and 92% by methods 1, 2, and 3, respectively; NS5b sequencing of discordants (16/17) revealed a putative new subtype within genotype 2 and that most subtype calls were not correct. Although only sequencing-based methods provide the possibility of identifying new variants, the real-time PCR method is rapid, straightforward, and simple to interpret, thus providing a good single-step alternative to more-time-consuming assays.
我们报告了一种用于丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)基因分型的新型实时聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测方法的评估情况。该检测方法的设计如下:通过针对非结构5b(NS5b)亚基因组区域进行扩增来对1型分离株进行基因分型。非1型分离株则通过在5'非编码区(5'NC)进行型特异性扩增子检测来分型(方法1;HCV基因分型分析物特异性试剂检测法)。将该方法与5'NC反向杂交法(方法2;InnoLiPA HCV II)和5'NC测序法(方法3;Trugene HCV 5'NC)进行了比较。采用方法1对295份血清进行了检测;其中223份血清也采用方法2进行了基因分型,89份血清采用方法3进行了基因分型。对NS5b片段进行测序和系统发育分析以解决不一致结果。通过PCR克隆和焦磷酸测序确认了疑似的多基因型感染。尽管方法1获得了2%的不确定率,但在基因型水平上与方法2和3的结果一致性较高。在8个不一致结果中,确认了5例混合感染情况。方法1、2和3对1型亚型分型的效率分别为100%、77%和74%;方法1和2之间有11/101个不一致结果(方法1大多正确);方法2和3之间有2/34个不一致结果。对于2型基因型,方法1、2和3的亚型分型效率分别为100%、45%和92%;对不一致结果(16/17)进行NS5b测序揭示了2型基因型内一个假定的新亚型,且大多数亚型分型结果不正确。虽然只有基于测序的方法才有识别新变异体的可能性,但实时PCR方法快速、直接且易于解读,因此为耗时更长的检测方法提供了一种良好的单步替代方法。