O'Keeffe Nikki, Ranjith Gopinath
Department of Liaison Psychiatry, St Thomas' Hospital, London.
Clin Med (Lond). 2007 Oct;7(5):478-81. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.7-5-478.
As emotional distress is often seen as an understandable reaction to a severe or life-threatening illness, clinicians are reluctant to make a diagnosis of depression and resort to alternative diagnoses such as adjustment disorder (AD) or demoralisation. This paper introduces these concepts and critically examines their clinical utility. It concludes that neither AD nor demoralisation can be clearly distinguished from depression on variables such as clinical symptoms, outcome or treatment response. Since AD and demoralisation are considered transient or understandable reactions, the risk of using these diagnoses as alternatives to depression in a clinical setting is that a simplistic approach of psychological therapies for the former and antidepressants for the latter will be adopted. Instead, a working diagnosis of a general distress syndrome complemented by a personalised formulation is advocated. This would lead to the generation of a problem list and a pragmatic management plan.
由于情绪困扰通常被视为对严重或危及生命疾病的一种可理解的反应,临床医生不愿诊断为抑郁症,而是采用诸如适应障碍(AD)或士气低落等替代诊断。本文介绍了这些概念,并对它们的临床实用性进行了批判性审视。结论是,无论是AD还是士气低落,在临床症状、预后或治疗反应等变量上都无法与抑郁症明确区分。由于AD和士气低落被认为是短暂的或可理解的反应,在临床环境中将这些诊断用作抑郁症替代诊断的风险在于,会采用针对前者的简单心理治疗方法和针对后者的抗抑郁药物治疗方法。相反,提倡做出一般困扰综合征的初步诊断,并辅以个性化的表述。这将产生一份问题清单和一个务实的管理计划。