Elia M, Cummings J H
Institute of Human Nutrition, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2007 Dec;61 Suppl 1:S40-74. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602938.
The energy values of carbohydrates continue to be debated. This is because of the use of different energy systems, for example, combustible, digestible, metabolizable, and so on. Furthermore, ingested macronutrients may not be fully available to tissues, and the tissues themselves may not be able fully to oxidize substrates made available to them. Therefore, for certain carbohydrates, the discrepancies between combustible energy (cEI), digestible energy (DE), metabolizable energy (ME) and net metabolizable energy (NME) may be considerable. Three food energy systems are in use in food tables and for food labelling in different world regions based on selective interpretation of the digestive physiology and metabolism of food carbohydrates. This is clearly unsatisfactory and confusing to the consumer. While it has been suggested that an enormous amount of work would have to be undertaken to change the current ME system into an NME system, the additional changes may not be as great as anticipated. In experimental work, carbohydrate is high in the macronutrient hierarchy of satiation. However, studies of eating behaviour indicate that it does not unconditionally depend on the oxidation of one nutrient, and argue against the operation of a simple carbohydrate oxidation or storage model of feeding behaviour to the exclusion of other macronutrients. The site, rate and extent of carbohydrate digestion in, and absorption from the gut are key to understanding the many roles of carbohydrate, although the concept of digestibility has different meanings. Within the nutrition community, the characteristic patterns of digestion that occur in the small (upper) vs large (lower) bowel are known to impact in contrasting ways on metabolism, while in the discussion of the energy value of foods, digestibility is defined as the proportion of combustible energy that is absorbed over the entire length of the gastrointestinal tract. Carbohydrates that reach the large bowel are fermented to short-chain fatty acids. The exact amounts and types of carbohydrate that reach the caecum are unknown, but are probably between 20 and 40 g/day in countries with 'westernized' diets, whereas they may reach 50 g/day where traditional staples are largely cereal or diets are high in fruit and vegetables. Non-starch polysaccharides clearly affect bowel habit and so, to a lesser extent, does resistant starch. However, the short-chain carbohydrates, which are also found in breast milk, have little if any laxative role, although do effect the balance of the flora. This latter property has led to the term 'prebiotic', which is defined as the capacity to increase selectively the numbers of bifidobacteria and lactobacilli without growth of other genera. This now well-established physiological property has not so far led through to clear health benefits, but current studies are focused on their potential to prevent diarrhoeal illnesses, improve well-being and immunomodulation, particularly in atopic children and on increased calcium absorption.
碳水化合物的能量值一直存在争议。这是因为使用了不同的能量系统,例如可燃能量、可消化能量、可代谢能量等等。此外,摄入的大量营养素可能无法被组织完全利用,而且组织自身可能也无法完全氧化提供给它们的底物。因此,对于某些碳水化合物来说,可燃能量(cEI)、可消化能量(DE)、可代谢能量(ME)和净可代谢能量(NME)之间的差异可能相当大。基于对食物碳水化合物消化生理学和代谢的选择性解释,三种食物能量系统在不同世界地区的食物成分表和食品标签中使用。这显然不能令消费者满意,还会让他们感到困惑。虽然有人提出要将当前的ME系统转变为NME系统需要进行大量工作,但额外的变化可能没有预期的那么大。在实验研究中,碳水化合物在饱腹感的大量营养素等级中含量较高。然而,饮食行为研究表明,饱腹感并非无条件地依赖于一种营养素的氧化,并且反对存在一种简单的碳水化合物氧化或储存饮食行为模型而排除其他大量营养素的观点。碳水化合物在肠道内的消化部位、速率和程度以及从肠道的吸收情况是理解碳水化合物多种作用的关键,尽管消化率的概念有不同的含义。在营养学界,已知小肠(上段)与大肠(下段)中发生的典型消化模式对新陈代谢有不同的影响,而在讨论食物的能量值时,消化率被定义为在整个胃肠道中吸收的可燃能量的比例。到达大肠的碳水化合物会发酵成短链脂肪酸。到达盲肠的碳水化合物的确切数量和类型尚不清楚,但在饮食“西方化”的国家,这一数量可能在每天20至40克之间,而在传统主食主要是谷物或水果和蔬菜摄入量高的地区,这一数量可能达到每天50克。非淀粉多糖明显会影响排便习惯,抗性淀粉在较小程度上也会有此作用。然而,母乳中也存在的短链碳水化合物几乎没有(如果有的话)通便作用,尽管它们会影响菌群平衡。后一种特性催生了“益生元”这一术语,其定义为能够选择性增加双歧杆菌和乳酸菌数量而不使其他菌属生长的能力。这种现已得到充分证实的生理特性目前尚未带来明显的健康益处,但当前的研究集中在它们预防腹泻疾病、改善健康状况和免疫调节的潜力上,特别是在特应性儿童中以及对增加钙吸收方面的潜力。