社区样本中实施不同类型性侵犯的男性之间的比较。
A comparison of men who committed different types of sexual assault in a community sample.
作者信息
Abbey Antonia, Parkhill Michele R, Clinton-Sherrod A Monique, Zawacki Tina
机构信息
Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, 5057 Woodward, 7th floor, Detroit, MI48202, USA.
出版信息
J Interpers Violence. 2007 Dec;22(12):1567-80. doi: 10.1177/0886260507306489.
This study extends past research by examining predictors of different types of sexual assault perpetration in a community sample. Computer-assisted self-interviews were conducted with a representative sample of 163 men in one large urban community. As hypothesized, many variables that are significant predictors of sexual assault perpetration in college student samples were also significant predictors in this sample, including empathy, adult attachment, attitudes about casual sex, sexual dominance, alcohol consumption in sexual situations, and peer approval of forced sex. For most measures, the strongest differences were between nonassaulters and men who committed acts that met standard legal definitions of rape. Men who committed forced sexual contact and verbal coercion tended to have scores that fell in between those of the other two groups. The implications of these findings are discussed for community-based sexual assault prevention programs.
本研究通过在社区样本中考察不同类型性侵犯行为的预测因素，扩展了以往的研究。对一个大型城市社区的163名男性代表性样本进行了计算机辅助自我访谈。正如所假设的那样，许多在大学生样本中是性侵犯行为重要预测因素的变量，在本样本中也是重要预测因素，包括同理心、成人依恋、对随意性行为的态度、性支配、性情境中的酒精消费以及同伴对强迫性行为的认可。对于大多数测量指标，最大的差异存在于未实施侵犯者与实施了符合法定强奸罪定义行为的男性之间。实施强迫性接触和言语胁迫的男性得分往往介于其他两组之间。本文讨论了这些研究结果对基于社区的性侵犯预防项目的启示。
Zotero 插件