Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
J Interpers Violence. 2011 Sep;26(14):2866-89. doi: 10.1177/0886260510390955. Epub 2010 Dec 13.
Past theory and empirical research have consistently associated a number of risk factors with sexual assault perpetration. This study extends past research by considering if the tactics which perpetrators use to obtain sex are associated with these risk factors or with characteristics of the sexual assault. Audio computer-assisted self-interviews were completed with a community sample of young, single men. Few participants reported using physical force as a tactic to obtain sex, thus this article focuses on 457 participants who used verbal coercion ( n = 152) or the victim's impairment (n = 39) to obtain sex or who were nonperpetrators (n = 266). Discriminant function analysis correctly classified 70% of participants. As hypothesized, analysis of covariance indicated that both groups of perpetrators scored higher than nonperpetrators on measures of negative attitudes toward women, positive attitudes about casual sex, personality traits associated with nonclinical levels of psychopathy, antisocial behavior, and alcohol problems. As compared to nonperpetrators describing their worst date, perpetrators knew the woman longer, used more isolating and controlling behaviors, misperceived her sexual intentions for a longer period of time, and engaged in more consensual sexual activities with the woman. Perpetrators who used impairment tactics did not usually consume more alcohol than other participants; however, they consumed much more alcohol during the incident. Although verbal coercion and taking advantage of an impaired victim are sometimes viewed as less serious tactics than the use of force, these findings demonstrate that perpetrators who use these strategies have personality, attitude, and experience profiles that distinguish them from nonperpetrators.
过去的理论和实证研究一直将许多风险因素与性侵犯行为联系在一起。本研究通过考虑犯罪者用来获取性的策略是否与这些风险因素或性侵犯的特征有关,从而扩展了过去的研究。对一群年轻的单身男性进行了音频计算机辅助自我访谈。很少有参与者报告使用武力作为获取性的策略,因此本文重点关注 457 名参与者,他们使用言语胁迫(n=152)或受害者的损伤(n=39)来获取性或非犯罪者(n=266)。判别函数分析正确地对 70%的参与者进行了分类。正如假设的那样,协方差分析表明,两组犯罪者在对女性的负面态度、对随意性行为的积极态度、与非临床水平的精神病态、反社会行为和酒精问题相关的人格特征方面的得分均高于非犯罪者。与非犯罪者描述他们最糟糕的约会相比,犯罪者与女性相识时间更长,使用了更多的孤立和控制行为,对她的性意图误解的时间更长,并且与女性进行了更多的双方同意的性活动。使用损伤策略的犯罪者通常不比其他参与者消耗更多的酒精;然而,他们在事件中消耗了更多的酒精。虽然言语胁迫和利用受损的受害者有时被视为比使用武力更不严重的策略,但这些发现表明,使用这些策略的犯罪者具有人格、态度和经验特征,使他们与非犯罪者区分开来。