Franklin Stanley S
Heart Disease Prevention Program, C-240 Medical Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2007 Nov;9(6):462-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02938390.
Recent interest in arterial stiffness as a possible new biomarker of cardiovascular (CV) disease has emerged. Arterial stiffness of the large, elastic conduit arteries is considered a risk marker of vascular aging; it leads to widened pulse pressure (PP) and the development of isolated systolic hypertension in the middle-aged and elderly population. However, increased PP is not always a good surrogate for arterial stiffening because of the frequent discrepancy between peripheral brachial and central aortic PP values caused by varying wave reflection activity. Therefore, noninvasive, easily performed methods for more direct measurement of arterial stiffness, such as pulse wave velocity (PWV) and pulse wave analysis (PWA) have been developed for clinical use. This article asks the question: How useful are PWV and PWA, when compared with traditional measurement of blood pressure components, as biomarkers of CV disease?
近期,人们开始关注动脉僵硬度作为心血管(CV)疾病一种可能的新生物标志物。大的弹性导管动脉的动脉僵硬度被认为是血管老化的风险标志物;它会导致脉压(PP)增宽,并在中老年人群中引发单纯收缩期高血压。然而,由于外周肱动脉和中心主动脉PP值因波反射活动不同而经常存在差异,PP升高并不总是动脉僵硬度增加的良好替代指标。因此,已经开发出用于临床的非侵入性、易于操作的更直接测量动脉僵硬度的方法,如脉搏波速度(PWV)和脉搏波分析(PWA)。本文提出一个问题:与传统的血压成分测量相比,PWV和PWA作为CV疾病的生物标志物有多大用处?