Suppr超能文献

用于描述腹膜透析中小溶质转运的简单模型。

Simple models for description of small-solute transport in peritoneal dialysis.

作者信息

Waniewski J, Werynski A, Heimbürger O, Lindholm B

机构信息

Institute of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Blood Purif. 1991;9(3):129-41. doi: 10.1159/000170009.

Abstract

The convective component in the general description of transport of solutes across the peritoneal membrane can be expressed as SQuc, where S is the sieving coefficient, Qu is the ultrafiltration flow rate, and c is the average concentration in the membrane (c = (1-F)cB + FcD, where cB and cD are blood plasma and dialysate solute concentration, respectively). F is a weighing function dependent on Qu, S, and the diffusive mass transport coefficient KBD. In this study a class of simple models of solute transport was considered in which S = 1 (justified for small solutes) was chosen, and F was selected as follows: F = 0 (as in the S = 1 (justified for small solutes) was chosen, and F was selected as follows: F = 0 (as in the widely used model of Garred and coworkers), F = 0.5 (theoretically justified model), F = 0.33 (theoretically justified for a high ultrafiltration period), and F = 1 (for convective transport from dialysate to blood). For all these models the estimation of KBD from clinical data can be performed with the aid of linear regression. The simple models were compared with the Pyle-Popovich model which takes into account the general expression for convective solute transport, for both the accuracy of the KBD determination (using linear regression) and the accuracy of theoretically calculated dialysate to plasma concentration ratios (D/P) to experimental D/P. Clinical evaluation of the new models was carried out in 28 6-hour dwell studies in 21 nondiabetic patients using 2 liters of hypertonic (glucose 3.86%) dialysis fluid. The differences between the simple models were small from the clinical point of view for urea, creatinine, glucose, and potassium, whereas for sodium the predictions were not satisfactory for any of the models. For urea and creatinine the model with F = 0.5 yielded the best fit of theoretical predictions to experimental data. For glucose and potassium small but systematic deviations of theoretical D/P from experimental D/P were observed for all simple models. The protein transport could be satisfactorily described by a model in which F = 1, as shown for total protein.

摘要

溶质跨腹膜转运的一般描述中的对流成分可表示为SQuc,其中S为筛系数,Qu为超滤流速,c为膜内平均浓度(c = (1 - F)cB + FcD,其中cB和cD分别为血浆和透析液溶质浓度)。F是一个依赖于Qu、S和扩散质量传输系数KBD的加权函数。在本研究中,考虑了一类溶质转运的简单模型,其中选择S = 1(对小分子溶质合理),F的选择如下:F = 0(如Garred及其同事广泛使用的模型),F = 0.5(理论上合理的模型),F = 0.33(在高超滤期理论上合理),F = 1(用于从透析液到血液的对流转运)。对于所有这些模型,可借助线性回归从临床数据估算KBD。将这些简单模型与考虑对流溶质转运一般表达式的Pyle - Popovich模型进行比较,比较内容包括KBD测定的准确性(使用线性回归)以及理论计算的透析液与血浆浓度比(D/P)与实验D/P的准确性。使用2升高渗(葡萄糖3.86%)透析液,对21名非糖尿病患者进行了28次6小时驻留研究,对新模型进行了临床评估。从临床角度看,对于尿素、肌酐、葡萄糖和钾,简单模型之间的差异较小,而对于钠,任何模型的预测都不令人满意。对于尿素和肌酐,F = 0.5的模型对理论预测与实验数据的拟合最佳。对于葡萄糖和钾,所有简单模型的理论D/P与实验D/P均存在小但系统性的偏差。如总蛋白所示,F = 1的模型可以令人满意地描述蛋白质转运。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验