Austin S Bryn, Conron Kerith, Patel Aarti, Freedner Naomi
Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave Boston, MA 02115, USA.
J LGBT Health Res. 2007;3(1):55-65. doi: 10.1300/j463v03n01_07.
To carry out a study using cognitive processing interview methods to explore ways in which adolescents understand sexual orientation questions currently used on epidemiologic surveys.
In-depth, individual interviews were conducted to probe cognitive processes involved in answering four self-report survey questions assessing sexual identity, sexual attraction, and sex of sexual partners.A semi-structured interview guide was used to explore variation in question interpretation, information retrieval patterns and problems, item clarity, valence of reactions to items (positive, negative, neutral), respondent burden, and perceived threat associated with the measures. Thirty adolescents aged 15 to 21 of diverse sexual orientations and race/ethnicities participated in the study, including female, male, and transgender youth.
A question on sexual attraction was the most consistently understood and thus was easy for nearly all youth to answer. In contrast, a measure of sexual identity with options heterosexual, bisexual, gay/lesbian, and unsure was the most difficult to answer. Most preferred a sexual identity item that also provided the intermediate options mostly heterosexual and mostly homosexual, which many said reflected their experience of feeling between categories. Participants had varying and inconsistent interpretations of sexual behavior terms, such as sex and sexual intercourse, used in assessing the sex of sexual partners.
Differences in understanding could affect interpretation of survey data in important ways. Development of valid measures of sexual orientation will be essential to better monitor health disparities.
采用认知加工访谈方法进行一项研究,以探索青少年理解目前在流行病学调查中使用的性取向问题的方式。
进行深入的个人访谈,以探究回答四个自我报告调查问题(评估性身份、性吸引力和性伴侣性别)所涉及的认知过程。使用半结构化访谈指南来探索问题解释、信息检索模式和问题、项目清晰度、对项目反应的效价(积极、消极、中性)、受访者负担以及与这些测量相关的感知威胁方面的差异。30名年龄在15至21岁之间、性取向和种族/民族各异的青少年参与了该研究,包括女性、男性和跨性别青年。
一个关于性吸引力的问题最容易被一致理解,因此几乎所有青少年都很容易回答。相比之下,一个有异性恋、双性恋、同性恋/女同性恋和不确定选项的性身份测量最难回答。大多数人更喜欢一个性身份项目,该项目还提供大多异性恋和大多同性恋的中间选项,许多人表示这反映了他们在不同类别之间的感受经历。参与者对用于评估性伴侣性别的性行为术语(如性和性交)有不同且不一致的解释。
理解上的差异可能在重要方面影响调查数据的解释。开发有效的性取向测量方法对于更好地监测健康差异至关重要。