Davenport Daniel L, Henderson William G, Mosca Cecilia L, Khuri Shukri F, Mentzer Robert M
Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536-0298, USA.
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Dec;205(6):778-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.07.039. Epub 2007 Oct 18.
Since the Institute of Medicine patient safety reports, a number of survey-based measures of organizational climate safety factors (OCSFs) have been developed. The goal of this study was to measure the impact of OCSFs on risk-adjusted surgical morbidity and mortality.
Surveys were administered to staff on general/vascular surgery services during a year. Surveys included multiitem scales measuring OCSFs. Additionally, perceived levels of communication and collaboration with coworkers were assessed. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was used to assess risk-adjusted morbidity and mortality. Correlations between outcomes and OCSFs were calculated and between outcomes and communication/collaboration with attending and resident doctors, nurses, and other providers.
Fifty-two sites participated in the survey: 44 Veterans Affairs and 8 academic medical centers. A total of 6,083 surveys were returned, for a response rate of 52%. The OCSF measures of teamwork climate, safety climate, working conditions, recognition of stress effects, job satisfaction, and burnout demonstrated internal validity but did not correlate with risk-adjusted outcomes. Reported levels of communication/collaboration with attending and resident doctors correlated with risk-adjusted morbidity.
Survey-based teamwork, safety climate, and working conditions scales are not confirmed to measure organizational factors that influence risk-adjusted surgical outcomes. Reported communication/collaboration with attending and resident doctors on surgical services influenced patient morbidity. This suggests the importance of doctors' coordination and decision-making roles on surgical teams in providing high-quality and safe care. We propose risk-adjusted morbidity as an effective measure of surgical patient safety.
自医学研究所发布患者安全报告以来,已开发出一些基于调查的组织氛围安全因素(OCSFs)测量方法。本研究的目的是测量OCSFs对风险调整后的手术发病率和死亡率的影响。
在一年时间里,对普通外科/血管外科服务的工作人员进行了调查。调查包括测量OCSFs的多项目量表。此外,还评估了与同事之间沟通与协作的感知水平。使用国家外科质量改进计划来评估风险调整后的发病率和死亡率。计算了结果与OCSFs之间以及结果与与主治医生、住院医生、护士和其他医疗服务提供者的沟通/协作之间的相关性。
52个机构参与了调查:44个退伍军人事务部机构和8个学术医疗中心。共回收6083份调查问卷,回复率为52%。团队合作氛围、安全氛围、工作条件、对压力影响的认知、工作满意度和职业倦怠等OCSFs测量指标显示出内部效度,但与风险调整后的结果无关。报告的与主治医生和住院医生的沟通/协作水平与风险调整后的发病率相关。
基于调查的团队合作、安全氛围和工作条件量表未被证实可用于测量影响风险调整后手术结果的组织因素。报告的手术服务中与主治医生和住院医生的沟通/协作影响了患者的发病率。这表明外科团队中医生的协调和决策作用对于提供高质量和安全的护理至关重要。我们建议将风险调整后的发病率作为衡量手术患者安全的有效指标。