• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院绩效:竞争价值还是共享价值?

Hospital performance: competing or shared values?

作者信息

Minvielle Etienne, Sicotte Claude, Champagne François, Contandriopoulos André-Pierre, Jeantet Marine, Préaubert Nathalie, Bourdil Annie, Richard Christian

机构信息

Centre for Medical Research, Medicine, Health and Society, 94276 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre cedex, France.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2008 Jul;87(1):8-19. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.09.017. Epub 2007 Nov 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.09.017
PMID:18035448
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To find out which are the emerging views on hospital performance and to analyze how these views vary among hospital stakeholders.

STUDY SETTING

Three hospital stakeholder groups (physicians, caregivers, and administrative staff) in a large Paris teaching hospital.

STUDY DESIGN

A case study combining a qualitative (interviews of 80 key hospital stakeholders and a survey of hospital staff), and a quantitative analysis (a questionnaire composed of 4 theoretical dimensions, 13 sub-dimensions, 66 items) with triangulation of the results.

RESULTS

Hospital stakeholders assign greatest importance to the human relations dimension, i.e., organizational climate (professional and public service values) and quality of work life. These values attract a high degree of consensus among stakeholders (no statistical difference between physicians, caregivers and administrative staff).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings challenge the mainstream view that competing values underlie hospital performance. Currently, views are to some extent shared among different stakeholder groups. A reason for this could be the need to form a more united front in the face of recent reforms. This common emphasis on professional and public service values could be the basis for formulating management priorities in teaching hospitals in order to improve performance.

摘要

目的

了解关于医院绩效的新观点,并分析这些观点在医院利益相关者之间如何不同。

研究背景

巴黎一家大型教学医院的三个医院利益相关者群体(医生、护理人员和行政人员)。

研究设计

一项案例研究,结合定性研究(对80名医院关键利益相关者进行访谈以及对医院工作人员进行调查)和定量分析(一份由4个理论维度、13个子维度、66个项目组成的问卷),并对结果进行三角验证。

结果

医院利益相关者最重视人际关系维度,即组织氛围(专业和公共服务价值观)以及工作生活质量。这些价值观在利益相关者之间达成了高度共识(医生、护理人员和行政人员之间无统计学差异)。

结论

我们的研究结果挑战了主流观点,即相互竞争的价值观是医院绩效的基础。目前,不同利益相关者群体在一定程度上持有相同观点。一个原因可能是面对近期的改革需要形成更统一的阵线。这种对专业和公共服务价值观的共同强调可为制定教学医院的管理重点以提高绩效奠定基础。

相似文献

1
Hospital performance: competing or shared values?医院绩效:竞争价值还是共享价值?
Health Policy. 2008 Jul;87(1):8-19. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.09.017. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
2
Teaching hospital performance: towards a community of shared values?教学医院绩效:迈向共享价值观共同体?
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Jan;101:107-12. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.11.027. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
3
Competing values of emergency department performance: balancing multiple stakeholder perspectives.急诊科绩效的相互竞争的价值观:平衡多个利益相关者的观点。
Health Serv Res. 2004 Aug;39(4 Pt 1):771-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00257.x.
4
Hospital network performance: a survey of hospital stakeholders' perspectives.医院网络绩效:医院利益相关者观点调查。
Health Policy. 2013 Feb;109(2):150-7. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.11.003. Epub 2012 Nov 30.
5
Hospital information system user acceptance factors: User group perspectives.医院信息系统用户接受度因素:用户群体视角
Inform Health Soc Care. 2018 Jan;43(1):84-107. doi: 10.1080/17538157.2016.1269109. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
6
[Which occupational groups in a hospital are particularly stressed?].[医院中的哪些职业群体压力特别大?]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2011 Jul;136(30):1517-22. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1281547. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
7
Work climate perception and turnover intention among Korean hospital staff.韩国医院员工的工作氛围感知与离职意愿
Int Nurs Rev. 2009 Mar;56(1):73-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2008.00641.x.
8
The surveillance of nursing standards: an organisational case study.护理标准的监督:一项组织案例研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2006 Nov;43(8):975-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.11.003. Epub 2005 Dec 19.
9
Patient safety climate in 92 US hospitals: differences by work area and discipline.美国92家医院的患者安全氛围:按工作领域和学科划分的差异
Med Care. 2009 Jan;47(1):23-31. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817e189d.
10
Factors influencing the success of rural cataract surgery programs in China: the study of hospital administration and relative productivity (SHARP).影响中国农村白内障手术项目成功的因素:医院管理与相对生产力研究(SHARP)。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Jan 9;54(1):266-73. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-10906.

引用本文的文献

1
Motives for choice of work in healthcare and individual performance of medical doctors working in public multispecialty hospitals in Warsaw.华沙公立多专科医院医生选择医疗行业的动机及个人表现
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Feb 6;12:1456341. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1456341. eCollection 2025.
2
A comparative analysis of the work environments for registered nurses, nurse aides, and caregivers using the 5th Korean Working Conditions Survey.使用第五次韩国工作条件调查对注册护士、护士助理和护理人员的工作环境进行的比较分析。
BMC Nurs. 2022 Dec 13;21(1):356. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-01120-9.
3
Evaluating Organizational Performance of Public Hospitals using the McKinsey 7-S Framework.
运用麦肯锡 7-S 框架评估公立医院的组织绩效。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jan 2;22(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07402-3.
4
What is the performance in public hospitals? A longitudinal analysis of performance plans through topic modeling.公立医院的表现如何?通过主题建模对绩效计划进行纵向分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Apr 9;21(1):326. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06332-4.
5
Job Satisfaction and Hospital Performance Rated by Physicians in China: A Moderated Mediation Analysis on the Role of Income and Person-Organization Fit.中国医生对工作满意度和医院绩效的评价:收入和人与组织适配度作用的中介调节分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 12;17(16):5846. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165846.
6
Life after opioid-involved overdose: survivor narratives and their implications for ER/ED interventions.阿片类药物过量后生活:幸存者的叙述及其对急诊室/ED 干预的意义。
Addiction. 2019 Aug;114(8):1379-1386. doi: 10.1111/add.14608. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
7
The Search is on for Coherent Performance Measurement in Healthcare Organizations. Has Quebec Reached a Crossroads?医疗保健组织中连贯绩效衡量的探索。魁北克是否已到十字路口?
Healthc Policy. 2016 May;11(4):60-9.
8
Building on the EGIPPS performance assessment: the multipolar framework as a heuristic to tackle the complexity of performance of public service oriented health care organisations.基于EGIPPS绩效评估:多极框架作为一种启发式方法来应对面向公共服务的医疗保健组织绩效的复杂性。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Apr 17;14:378. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-378.
9
Main barriers to effective implementation of stroke care pathways in France: a qualitative study.法国有效实施中风护理路径的主要障碍:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 28;14:95. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-95.
10
Health systems performance assessment in low-income countries: learning from international experiences.低收入国家的卫生系统绩效评估:国际经验学习。
Global Health. 2014 Feb 13;10:5. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-10-5.