Rakha Emad A, El-Sayed Maysa E, Powe Desmond G, Green Andrew R, Habashy Hany, Grainge Matthew J, Robertson John F R, Blamey Roger, Gee Julia, Nicholson Robert I, Lee Andrew H S, Ellis Ian O
Department of Histopathology, School of Molecular Medical Sciences, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Eur J Cancer. 2008 Jan;44(1):73-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.10.009. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) comprises approximately 5-15% of breast cancers and appears to have a distinct biology. It is less common than invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and few large studies have addressed its biologic characteristics and behaviour with respect to long-term clinical outcome and response to adjuvant therapy.
This study is based on a large and well-characterised consecutive series of invasive breast carcinomas with a long-term follow-up (up to 25 years). This series included 415 (8%) patients with pure ILC and 2901 (55.7%) with IDC (not otherwise specified) identified from a consecutive cohort of 5680 breast tumours presented to our Breast Unit that were treated in a similar conventional manner. Clinicopathological, therapy and outcome information as well as data on a large panel of biomarkers were available.
Compared to IDC, patients with ILC tended to be older and present with tumours which are more frequently lower grade (typically, grade 2 [84%]), hormone-receptor positive (86% compared to 61% in IDC), of larger size, and with the absence of vascular invasion. A higher frequency of ILC was placed in the good Nottingham Prognostic Index group (40% compared to 21% in IDC). ILC showed indolent but progressive behavioural characteristics with nearly linear survival curves which crossed those of IDC after approximately 10years of follow-up, thus eventually exhibiting a worse long-term outcome. Importantly, ILC showed a better response to adjuvant hormonal therapy (HT) with improvement in survival in patients who received HT compared with matched patients with IDC.
ILC is a distinct entity of breast cancer that responds well to adjuvant HT. These data add important clinical information for assessing the long-term benefits of adjuvant HT use in ILC.
小叶原位癌(ILC)约占乳腺癌的5%-15%,似乎具有独特的生物学特性。它比浸润性导管癌(IDC)少见,很少有大型研究探讨其生物学特征以及与长期临床结局和辅助治疗反应相关的行为。
本研究基于一系列特征明确的连续性浸润性乳腺癌病例,并进行了长期随访(长达25年)。该系列包括从我们乳腺科收治的5680例乳腺肿瘤连续队列中识别出的415例(8%)纯ILC患者和2901例(55.7%)IDC患者(未作其他说明),这些患者均接受了类似的传统治疗。可获取临床病理、治疗和结局信息以及大量生物标志物数据。
与IDC相比,ILC患者往往年龄较大,所患肿瘤分级较低(通常为2级[84%])、激素受体阳性(86%,而IDC为61%)、肿瘤较大且无血管侵犯更为常见。ILC患者被归入诺丁汉预后指数良好组的频率更高(40%,而IDC为21%)。ILC表现出惰性但呈进行性的行为特征,生存曲线近乎呈线性,在随访约10年后超过了IDC的生存曲线,因此最终显示出更差的长期结局。重要的是,ILC对辅助激素治疗(HT)反应更好,与匹配的IDC患者相比,接受HT的患者生存率有所提高。
ILC是一种对辅助HT反应良好的独特乳腺癌类型。这些数据为评估辅助HT在ILC中的长期益处增添了重要的临床信息。