Jefferson Tom, Foxlee Ruth, Del Mar Chris, Dooley Liz, Ferroni Eliana, Hewak Bill, Prabhala Adi, Nair Sree, Rivetti Alex
Cochrane Vaccines Field, Alessandria, Italy.
BMJ. 2008 Jan 12;336(7635):77-80. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39393.510347.BE. Epub 2007 Nov 27.
To systematically review evidence for the effectiveness of physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses.
Search strategy of the Cochrane Library, Medline, OldMedline, Embase, and CINAHL, without language restriction, for any intervention to prevent transmission of respiratory viruses (isolation, quarantine, social distancing, barriers, personal protection, and hygiene). Study designs were randomised trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, and controlled before and after studies.
Of 2300 titles scanned 138 full papers were retrieved, including 49 papers of 51 studies. Study quality was poor for the three randomised controlled trials and most of the cluster randomised controlled trials; the observational studies were of mixed quality. Heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis of most data except that from six case-control studies. The highest quality cluster randomised trials suggest that the spread of respiratory viruses into the community can be prevented by intervening with hygienic measures aimed at younger children. Meta-analysis of six case-control studies suggests that physical measures are highly effective in preventing the spread of SARS: handwashing more than 10 times daily (odds ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.36 to 0.57; number needed to treat=4, 95% confidence interval 3.65 to 5.52); wearing masks (0.32, 0.25 to 0.40; NNT=6, 4.54 to 8.03); wearing N95 masks (0.09, 0.03 to 0.30; NNT=3, 2.37 to 4.06); wearing gloves (0.43, 0.29 to 0.65; NNT=5, 4.15 to 15.41); wearing gowns (0.23, 0.14 to 0.37; NNT=5, 3.37 to 7.12); and handwashing, masks, gloves, and gowns combined (0.09, 0.02 to 0.35; NNT=3, 2.66 to 4.97). The incremental effect of adding virucidals or antiseptics to normal handwashing to decrease the spread of respiratory disease remains uncertain. The lack of proper evaluation of global measures such as screening at entry ports and social distancing prevent firm conclusions being drawn.
Routine long term implementation of some physical measures to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses might be difficult but many simple and low cost interventions could be useful in reducing the spread.
系统评价物理干预措施在阻断或减少呼吸道病毒传播方面有效性的证据。
检索Cochrane图书馆、Medline、OldMedline、Embase和CINAHL,不限语言,查找任何预防呼吸道病毒传播的干预措施(隔离、检疫、社交距离、屏障、个人防护和卫生措施)。研究设计包括随机试验、队列研究、病例对照研究以及前后对照研究。
在扫描的2300篇标题中,检索到138篇全文,包括51项研究的49篇论文。三项随机对照试验和大多数整群随机对照试验的研究质量较差;观察性研究质量参差不齐。除六项病例对照研究的数据外,异质性使得大多数数据无法进行荟萃分析。质量最高的整群随机试验表明,通过针对年幼儿童采取卫生措施可以预防呼吸道病毒在社区中的传播。六项病例对照研究的荟萃分析表明,物理措施在预防SARS传播方面非常有效:每天洗手超过10次(优势比0.45,95%置信区间0.36至0.57;需治疗人数=4,95%置信区间3.65至5.52);佩戴口罩(0.32,0.25至0.40;需治疗人数=6,4.54至8.03);佩戴N95口罩(0.09,0.03至0.30;需治疗人数=3,2.37至4.06);戴手套(0.43,0.29至0.65;需治疗人数=5,4.15至15.41);穿隔离衣(0.23,0.14至0.37;需治疗人数=5,3.37至7.12);以及洗手、戴口罩、戴手套和穿隔离衣联合使用(0.09,0.02至0.35;需治疗人数=3,2.66至4.97)。在常规洗手中添加杀毒剂或防腐剂以减少呼吸道疾病传播的增量效果仍不确定。缺乏对诸如入境口岸筛查和社交距离等整体措施的恰当评估,无法得出确凿结论。
长期常规实施一些物理措施来阻断或减少呼吸道病毒传播可能存在困难,但许多简单且低成本的干预措施可能有助于减少传播。