• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床试验与医疗护理：界定治疗性误解

Clinical trials and medical care: defining the therapeutic misconception.

作者信息

Henderson Gail E, Churchill Larry R, Davis Arlene M, Easter Michele M, Grady Christine, Joffe Steven, Kass Nancy, King Nancy M P, Lidz Charles W, Miller Franklin G, Nelson Daniel K, Peppercorn Jeffrey, Rothschild Barbra Bluestone, Sankar Pamela, Wilfond Benjamin S, Zimmer Catherine R

机构信息

University of North Carolina at ChapelHill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United Statesof America.

出版信息

PLoS Med. 2007 Nov 27;4(11):e324. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040324.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040324
PMID:18044980
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2082641/
Abstract

A key component of informed consent to participate in medical research includes understanding that research is not the same as treatment.

摘要

参与医学研究的知情同意的一个关键组成部分包括理解研究与治疗不同。

相似文献

1
Clinical trials and medical care: defining the therapeutic misconception.临床试验与医疗护理：界定治疗性误解
PLoS Med. 2007 Nov 27;4(11):e324. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040324.
2
The therapeutic misconception: problems and solutions.治疗性误解：问题与解决方案
Med Care. 2002 Sep;40(9 Suppl):V55-63. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000023956.25813.18.
3
How can we draw the line between clinical care and medical research.我们如何划分临床护理和医学研究之间的界限？
PLoS Med. 2007 Nov 27;4(11):e340. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040340.
4
Decision making and decision analysis: beneficence in medicine.决策与决策分析：医学中的善行
J Crit Care. 1988 Jun;3(2):122-32. doi: 10.1016/0883-9441(88)90045-7.
5
The evolution of informed consent in American medicine.美国医学中知情同意的演变。
Perspect Biol Med. 1995 Spring;38(3):498-510. doi: 10.1353/pbm.1995.0039.
6
Conflicts of interest: research and clinical care.利益冲突：研究与临床护理
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1994;8(Suppl. 4):49-57.
7
Patients, agents, and informed consent.患者、代理人与知情同意。
J Law Health. 1985;1:43-59..
8
Improving informed consent by implementing shared decisionmaking in health care.通过在医疗保健中实施共同决策来改善知情同意。
IRB. 1999 Jul-Aug;21(4):1-5.
9
Toward an informed discussion of informed consent: a review and critique of the empirical studies.迈向关于知情同意的明智讨论：实证研究的综述与批判
Ariz Law Rev. 1983;25(2):265-346.
10
Informed consent and the danger of bias in the formation of medical disclosure practices.知情同意与医疗信息披露实践形成过程中存在偏差的风险。
Wis L Rev. 1976;1976(1):124-70.

引用本文的文献

1
Oncologists' knowledge, practices and ethical opinions about therapeutic misconception: a French national survey.肿瘤学家关于治疗误解的知识、实践及伦理观点：一项法国全国性调查。
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Jul 11;26(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01260-y.
2
Measuring the efficacy of community consultation in a pediatric exception from informed consent trial.在一项儿科知情同意豁免试验中衡量社区咨询的效果。
Acad Emerg Med. 2025 May;32(5):506-515. doi: 10.1111/acem.15073. Epub 2024 Dec 29.
3
Human artificial placenta technology-trials: counselling and informed consent using healthcare professionals' and parental perspectives.人类人工胎盘技术试验：从医疗专业人员和家长角度进行咨询与知情同意
Pediatr Res. 2025 Apr 16. doi: 10.1038/s41390-025-04051-8.
4
Cartilage repair: unleashing PRP's potential in organoid models.软骨修复：释放富血小板血浆在类器官模型中的潜力。
Cytotechnology. 2025 Jun;77(3):86. doi: 10.1007/s10616-025-00739-1. Epub 2025 Apr 3.
5
The state of targeted therapeutic pharmacological approaches in pediatric neurosurgery: report from the European Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery (ESPN) Consensus Conference 2024.小儿神经外科靶向治疗药理学方法的现状：来自欧洲小儿神经外科学会（ESPN）2024年共识会议的报告
Childs Nerv Syst. 2025 Apr 2;41(1):149. doi: 10.1007/s00381-025-06799-0.
6
Accelerating implementation of visual key information to improve informed consent in research: a single-institution feasibility study and implementation testing.加速视觉关键信息的实施以改善研究中的知情同意：一项单机构可行性研究与实施测试
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 18;15(3):e092185. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092185.
7
Chasing 'vulnerability' across six decades of the Declaration of Helsinki.在六十年的《赫尔辛基宣言》历程中追寻“脆弱性”
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2025 Jun;43(1):1-33. doi: 10.1007/s40592-025-00235-4. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
8
'It is scary to pause treatment': perspectives on HIV cure-related research and analytical treatment interruptions from women diagnosed during acute HIV in Durban, South Africa.“暂停治疗令人恐惧”：南非德班急性感染艾滋病毒女性对艾滋病毒治愈相关研究及分析性治疗中断的看法
HIV Res Clin Pract. 2025 Dec;26(1):2455917. doi: 10.1080/25787489.2025.2455917. Epub 2025 Jan 25.
9
Placebo Rates in Crohn's Disease Randomized Clinical Trials: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.克罗恩病随机临床试验中的安慰剂率：一项个体患者数据荟萃分析。
Gastroenterology. 2025 Feb;168(2):344-356. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2024.10.009. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
10
Recall and Appraisal of the Risks, Benefits, and Objectives of Interrupting HIV Treatment in an HIV Cure-Related Study.HIV 治疗中断相关研究中对风险、获益和目标的回顾与评估。
AIDS Behav. 2024 Dec;28(12):4136-4145. doi: 10.1007/s10461-024-04485-x. Epub 2024 Sep 17.

本文引用的文献

1
The Belmont Report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research.《贝尔蒙报告》。保护人类研究受试者的伦理原则与准则。
J Am Coll Dent. 2014 Summer;81(3):4-13.
2
Re-evaluating the therapeutic misconception: response to Miller and Joffe.重新评估治疗性误解：对米勒和乔菲的回应。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2006 Dec;16(4):367-73. doi: 10.1353/ken.2006.0021.
3
Evaluating the therapeutic misconception.评估治疗性误解。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2006 Dec;16(4):353-66. doi: 10.1353/ken.2006.0025.
4
The many meanings of care in clinical research.临床研究中“关怀”的多重含义。
Sociol Health Illn. 2006 Sep;28(6):695-712. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2006.00537.x.
5
Rethinking risk-benefit assessment for phase I cancer trials.重新思考癌症I期试验的风险效益评估。
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jul 1;24(19):2987-90. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.9296.
6
Assessment of therapeutic misconception in older schizophrenia patients with a brief instrument.使用简易工具评估老年精神分裂症患者的治疗误解
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Mar;163(3):500-6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.3.500.
7
Evaluating the quality of informed consent.评估知情同意书的质量。
Clin Trials. 2005;2(1):34-41. doi: 10.1191/1740774505cn066oa.
8
Vulnerability to influence: a two-way street.易受影响性：一条双向道。
Am J Bioeth. 2004 Summer;4(3):50-2; discussion W32. doi: 10.1080/15265160490497371.
9
Consensus and controversy in clinical research ethics.临床研究伦理中的共识与争议。
JAMA. 2005 Sep 21;294(11):1411-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.11.1411.
10
Confronting the issues of therapeutic misconception, enrollment decisions, and personal motives in genetic medicine-based clinical research studies for fatal disorders.在针对致命疾病的基于基因医学的临床研究中，直面治疗误解、入组决策和个人动机等问题。
Hum Gene Ther. 2005 Sep;16(9):1028-36. doi: 10.1089/hum.2005.16.1028.