我们如何划分临床护理和医学研究之间的界限？
How can we draw the line between clinical care and medical research.
出版信息
PLoS Med. 2007 Nov 27;4(11):e340. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040340.
Abstract
What can editors do to help resolve misinterpretation of the boundary between clinical care and medical research?
摘要
编辑们可以做些什么来帮助解决对临床护理和医学研究之间界限的误解？
相似文献
1
How can we draw the line between clinical care and medical research.我们如何划分临床护理和医学研究之间的界限？
PLoS Med. 2007 Nov 27;4(11):e340. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040340.
2
Evaluating the therapeutic misconception.评估治疗性误解。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2006 Dec;16(4):353-66. doi: 10.1353/ken.2006.0025.
3
Clinical trials and medical care: defining the therapeutic misconception.临床试验与医疗护理：界定治疗性误解
PLoS Med. 2007 Nov 27;4(11):e324. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040324.
4
Exploring the ethics and psychological impact of deception in psychological research.探索心理学研究中欺骗行为的伦理及心理影响。
IRB. 2013 Mar-Apr;35(2):7-13.
5
The gambler's fallacy, the therapeutic misconception, and unrealistic optimism.赌徒谬误、治疗性误解和不切实际的乐观主义。
IRB. 2013 Mar-Apr;35(2):1-6.
6
The moral primacy of the human being.人类的道德首要地位。
J Med Ethics. 2010 Sep;36(9):563-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.037390. Epub 2010 Aug 6.
7
Time to stop worrying about the therapeutic misconception.是时候停止担心治疗性误解了。
J Clin Ethics. 2012 Fall;23(3):272-87.
8
Eschewing definitions of the therapeutic misconception: a family resemblance analysis.避开治疗性误解的定义：一种家族相似性分析
J Med Philos. 2011 Jun;36(3):296-320. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhr014. Epub 2011 May 23.
9
Legal and ethical aspects of clinical trials: the views of researchers.临床试验的法律与伦理问题：研究者的观点
Med Law Rev. 2003 Spring;11(1):48-66. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/11.1.48.
10
Clinical research: the patients' perspectives.临床研究：患者的观点。
Injury. 2008 Jun;39(6):631-5. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.12.025. Epub 2008 May 27.
本文引用的文献
1
The Belmont Report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research.《贝尔蒙报告》。保护人类研究受试者的伦理原则与准则。
J Am Coll Dent. 2014 Summer;81(3):4-13.
2
Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.《赫尔辛基宣言》。涉及人类受试者的医学研究伦理原则。
J Indian Med Assoc. 2009 Jun;107(6):403-5.
3
Clinical trials and medical care: defining the therapeutic misconception.临床试验与医疗护理：界定治疗性误解
PLoS Med. 2007 Nov 27;4(11):e324. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040324.
4
HIV prevention, care, and treatment in two prisons in Thailand.泰国两所监狱中的艾滋病毒预防、护理及治疗
PLoS Med. 2007 Jun;4(6):e204. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040204.
5
PLoS Medicine's Advisory Group on Publication Ethics.《公共科学图书馆·医学》出版伦理咨询小组
PLoS Med. 2007 Feb;4(2):e81. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040081.
6
Principles for international registration of protocol information and results from human trials of health related interventions: Ottawa statement (part 1).健康相关干预措施人体试验方案信息及结果的国际注册原则：渥太华声明（第1部分）
BMJ. 2005 Apr 23;330(7497):956-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7497.956.
7
Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.临床试验注册：国际医学期刊编辑委员会的声明
Ann Intern Med. 2004 Sep 21;141(6):477-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-6-200409210-00109. Epub 2004 Sep 8.
8
For and against: clinical equipoise and not the uncertainty principle is the moral underpinning of the randomised controlled trial.支持与反对：临床 equipoise（平衡）而非不确定性原理才是随机对照试验的道德基础。 注：这里equipoise可结合医学语境准确理解其含义。
BMJ. 2000 Sep 23;321(7263):756-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7263.756.
Zotero 插件