Suppr超能文献

运动期间音乐节奏的心理效应。

Psychological effects of music tempi during exercise.

作者信息

Karageorghis C, Jones L, Stuart D P

机构信息

School of Sport and Education, Brunel University, West London, Uxbridge, Middlesex, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Int J Sports Med. 2008 Jul;29(7):613-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-989266. Epub 2007 Nov 30.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of music tempi on music preference, intrinsic motivation, and flow during long-duration exercise (approximately 26 min). Subjects (n = 29) selected the music of a single artist then walked at 70 % of maximum heart rate reserve (maxHRR) on a treadmill under three experimental conditions (medium tempi, fast tempi, and mixed tempi) and a no-music control. A music preference item, the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory, and Flow State Scale-2 were completed after each trial. Data were analyzed using a mixed-model (Gender x Condition) ANOVA and MANOVA. The Gender x Condition interaction was nonsignificant in both analyses (p > 0.05). Contrary to expectations, higher preference scores were recorded for medium tempi than for mixed tempi (means: 7.8 +/- 1.3 vs. 7.1 +/- 1.1). The medium tempi music also yielded the highest levels of intrinsic motivation (p < 0.001). Pairwise comparisons showed that interest-enjoyment was higher for medium tempi when compared to mixed tempi, 95% CI = 1.80-8.48, p = 0.001, and that each of the music preference experimental conditions yielded higher scores than the no-music control. Also, pressure-tension was lower for medium tempi compared to fast tempi, 95% CI = -3.44-0.19, p = 0.022, and for both medium and mixed tempi compared to control (95% CI = -5.33-2.89, p = 0.000; 95% CI = -4.24 - 0.64, p = 0.004). A main effect was found for global flow (p = 0.000) with the highest mean score evident in the medium tempi condition (14.6 +/- 1.5). Follow-up comparisons indicated that the medium tempi condition yielded higher flow scores than the control, 95% CI = 1.25-3.60, p = 0.000, as did fast tempi, 95% CI = 0.89-3.14, p = 0.000, and mixed tempi, 95% CI = 1.36-3.76, p = 0.000. It was concluded that a medium tempi music program was the most appropriate for an exercise intensity of 70% maxHRR.

摘要

本研究旨在调查音乐节奏对长时间运动(约26分钟)期间音乐偏好、内在动机和心流体验的影响。受试者(n = 29)选择一位艺术家的音乐,然后在三种实验条件(中等节奏、快节奏和混合节奏)以及无音乐对照条件下,以最大心率储备(maxHRR)的70%在跑步机上行走。每次试验后完成一份音乐偏好项目、内在动机量表和心流状态量表-2。使用混合模型(性别×条件)方差分析和多变量方差分析对数据进行分析。在两项分析中,性别×条件交互作用均不显著(p > 0.05)。与预期相反,中等节奏的偏好得分高于混合节奏(均值:7.8 ± 1.3 vs. 7.1 ± 1.1)。中等节奏的音乐也产生了最高水平的内在动机(p < 0.001)。成对比较表明,与混合节奏相比,中等节奏的兴趣-享受程度更高,95%置信区间 = 1.80 - 8.48,p = 0.001,并且每个音乐偏好实验条件的得分均高于无音乐对照。此外,与快节奏相比,中等节奏的压力-紧张程度更低,95%置信区间 = -3.44 - 0.19,p = 0.022,与对照相比,中等节奏和混合节奏的压力-紧张程度均更低(95%置信区间 = -5.33 - 2.89,p = 0.000;95%置信区间 = -4.24 - 0.64,p = 0.004)。发现全局心流存在主效应(p = 0.000),中等节奏条件下的平均得分最高(14.6 ± 1.5)。后续比较表明,中等节奏条件下心流得分高于对照,95%置信区间 = 1.25 - 3.60,p = 0.000,快节奏条件下也是如此,95%置信区间 = 0.89 - 3.14,p = 0.000,混合节奏条件下同样如此,95%置信区间 = 1.36 - 3.76,p = 0.000。得出的结论是,中等节奏的音乐节目最适合70% maxHRR的运动强度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验