• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种不同基因型水稻对褐飞虱的反应。

Responses of two contrasting genotypes of rice to brown planthopper.

作者信息

Wang Yuanyuan, Wang Xiaolan, Yuan Hongyu, Chen Rongzhi, Zhu Lili, He Ruifeng, He Guangcun

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Plant Development Biology, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, P.R. China.

出版信息

Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2008 Jan;21(1):122-32. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-21-1-0122.

DOI:10.1094/MPMI-21-1-0122
PMID:18052889
Abstract

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) and brown planthoppers (BPH) (Nilaparvata lugens Stål) provide an ideal system for studying molecular mechanisms involved in the interactions between plants and phloem-feeding insects. The phenotypic responses and changes in transcript profiles of seedlings representing two rice cultivars differing in resistance to the BPH were analyzed. In the BPH-compatible (susceptible) cv. MH63, BPH feeding reduced three examined plant growth parameters (leaf area expansion, height increases, and dry weight increases) and photosynthetic rates of the leaves. In the BPH-incompatible (resistant) cv. B5, BPH feeding caused slight reductions in protein and sucrose contents, but the plants maintained their photosynthetic activity and grew normally. A cDNA microarray containing 1,920 suppression subtractive hybridization clones was used to explore the transcript profiles differences in the two cultivars under control and BPH-feeding conditions. In total, 160 unique genes were detected as being significantly affected by BPH feeding in rice plants, covering a wide range of functional categories, and there were 38 genes that showed the similar transcript pattern in both genotypes. The physiological responses and transcript profiles of plants represented in both genotypes suggested that multiple pathways might be involved in reprogramming of BPH-infested rice plants. The differences in transcript levels between the compatible and incompatible interactions revealed in this study were not only the reaction of resistance and susceptibility but also reflections of different damage rates and genotypic backgrounds of the rice cultivars.

摘要

水稻(Oryza sativa L.)和褐飞虱(Nilaparvata lugens Stål)为研究植物与吸食韧皮部昆虫之间相互作用所涉及的分子机制提供了一个理想的系统。分析了代表两个对褐飞虱抗性不同的水稻品种的幼苗的表型反应和转录谱变化。在与褐飞虱亲和(感虫)的品种MH63中,褐飞虱取食降低了三个检测的植物生长参数(叶面积扩展、株高增加和干重增加)以及叶片的光合速率。在与褐飞虱不亲和(抗性)的品种B5中,褐飞虱取食导致蛋白质和蔗糖含量略有降低,但植株保持了光合活性并正常生长。利用包含1920个抑制性消减杂交克隆的cDNA微阵列,探究了两个品种在对照和褐飞虱取食条件下的转录谱差异。总共检测到160个独特基因在水稻植株中受褐飞虱取食的显著影响,涵盖广泛的功能类别,并且有38个基因在两种基因型中呈现相似的转录模式。两种基因型植株的生理反应和转录谱表明,多个途径可能参与了受褐飞虱侵染的水稻植株的重编程。本研究揭示的亲和与不亲和相互作用之间转录水平的差异不仅是抗性和感病性的反应,也是水稻品种不同受害率和基因型背景的反映。

相似文献

1
Responses of two contrasting genotypes of rice to brown planthopper.两种不同基因型水稻对褐飞虱的反应。
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2008 Jan;21(1):122-32. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-21-1-0122.
2
Molecular dynamics of detoxification and toxin-tolerance genes in brown planthopper (Nilaparvata lugens Stål., Homoptera: Delphacidae) feeding on resistant rice plants.取食抗性水稻植株的褐飞虱(Nilaparvata lugens Stål.,同翅目:飞虱科)中解毒和毒素耐受基因的分子动力学
Arch Insect Biochem Physiol. 2005 Jun;59(2):59-66. doi: 10.1002/arch.20055.
3
Mapping and marker-assisted selection of a brown planthopper resistance gene bph2 in rice (Oryza sativa L.).水稻(Oryza sativa L.)中褐飞虱抗性基因bph2的定位与标记辅助选择
Yi Chuan Xue Bao. 2006 Aug;33(8):717-23. doi: 10.1016/S0379-4172(06)60104-2.
4
Revealing different systems responses to brown planthopper infestation for pest susceptible and resistant rice plants with the combined metabonomic and gene-expression analysis.采用代谢组学和基因表达联合分析揭示感虫和抗虫水稻植株对褐飞虱为害的不同系统响应。
J Proteome Res. 2010 Dec 3;9(12):6774-85. doi: 10.1021/pr100970q. Epub 2010 Nov 1.
5
Understanding rice plant resistance to the Brown Planthopper (Nilaparvata lugens): a proteomic approach.了解水稻对褐飞虱(Nilaparvata lugens)的抗性:一种蛋白质组学方法。
Proteomics. 2009 May;9(10):2798-808. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200800840.
6
Role of hydroperoxide lyase in white-backed planthopper (Sogatella furcifera Horváth)-induced resistance to bacterial blight in rice, Oryza sativa L.过氧化氢裂解酶在褐飞虱(褐飞虱)诱导的水稻细菌性条斑病抗性中的作用,Oryza sativa L.
Plant J. 2010 Jan;61(1):46-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.04031.x. Epub 2009 Sep 26.
7
Biological effects of rice harbouring Bph14 and Bph15 on brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens.含有 Bph14 和 Bph15 的水稻对褐飞虱(Nilaparvata lugens)的生物学影响。
Pest Manag Sci. 2011 May;67(5):528-34. doi: 10.1002/ps.2089. Epub 2011 Jan 19.
8
Identification of quantitative trait loci associated with resistance to brown planthopper in the indica rice cultivar Col.5 Thailand.泰国籼稻品种Col.5中与褐飞虱抗性相关的数量性状位点的鉴定。
Hereditas. 2007 May;144(2):48-52. doi: 10.1111/j.2006.0018-0661.01932.x.
9
SSR mapping of brown planthopper resistance gene Bph9 in Kaharamana, an Indica rice (Oryza sativa L.).印度籼稻(Oryza sativa L.)品种Kaharamana中褐飞虱抗性基因Bph9的SSR定位
Yi Chuan Xue Bao. 2006 Mar;33(3):262-8. doi: 10.1016/S0379-4172(06)60049-8.
10
The distribution and identification of brown planthopper resistance genes in rice.水稻中褐飞虱抗性基因的分布与鉴定
Hereditas. 2009 May;146(2):67-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.2009.02088.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Transcriptomic and metabolomic analysis of poplar response to feeding by Hyphantria cunea.杨树对美国白蛾取食响应的转录组学和代谢组学分析
BMC Plant Biol. 2024 Oct 2;24(1):920. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05631-2.
2
Combined miRNA and mRNA sequencing reveals the defensive strategies of resistant YHY15 rice against differentially virulent brown planthoppers.miRNA与mRNA联合测序揭示抗性水稻YHY15对不同毒力褐飞虱的防御策略。
Front Plant Sci. 2024 Mar 18;15:1366515. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1366515. eCollection 2024.
3
Transcriptome analysis revealed differentially expressed genes in rice functionally associated with brown planthopper defense in near isogenic lines pyramiding and .
转录组分析揭示了在聚合了 和 的近等基因系中,水稻中与褐飞虱防御功能相关的差异表达基因。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Aug 8;14:1250590. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1250590. eCollection 2023.
4
Transcriptome and Metabolome Profiling Reveal the Resistance Mechanisms of Rice against Brown Planthopper.转录组和代谢组学分析揭示了水稻抗褐飞虱的机制。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Apr 7;23(8):4083. doi: 10.3390/ijms23084083.
5
Detection of Yeast-like Symbionts in Brown Planthopper Reared on Different Resistant Rice Varieties Combining DGGE and Absolute Quantitative Real-Time PCR.结合变性梯度凝胶电泳(DGGE)和绝对定量实时荧光定量PCR技术检测不同抗性水稻品种饲养的褐飞虱体内类酵母共生菌
Insects. 2022 Jan 13;13(1):85. doi: 10.3390/insects13010085.
6
Over-Expression of Chorismate Mutase Enhances the Accumulation of Salicylic Acid, Lignin, and Antioxidants in Response to the White-Backed Planthopper in Rice Plants.分支酸变位酶的过表达增强了水稻植株对白背飞虱反应中水杨酸、木质素和抗氧化剂的积累。
Antioxidants (Basel). 2021 Oct 25;10(11):1680. doi: 10.3390/antiox10111680.
7
Positive and negative interspecific interactions between coexisting rice planthoppers neutralise the effects of elevated temperatures.共存的稻飞虱之间的正负种间相互作用抵消了温度升高的影响。
Funct Ecol. 2021 Jan;35(1):181-192. doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.13683. Epub 2020 Oct 4.
8
Identification and analysis of miRNAs in IR56 rice in response to BPH infestations of different virulence levels.对不同毒力水平褐飞虱侵害下IR56水稻中微小RNA的鉴定与分析。
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 5;10(1):19093. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76198-9.
9
A combined microRNA and transcriptome analyses illuminates the resistance response of rice against brown planthopper.联合 miRNA 和转录组分析揭示了水稻对褐飞虱的抗性反应。
BMC Genomics. 2020 Feb 10;21(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-6556-6.
10
Lipid profiles reveal different responses to brown planthopper infestation for pest susceptible and resistant rice plants.脂质谱揭示了害虫易感和抗虫水稻植株对褐飞虱侵害的不同反应。
Metabolomics. 2018 Sep 3;14(9):120. doi: 10.1007/s11306-018-1422-0.