Moret Leïla, Nguyen Jean-Michel, Pillet Nathalie, Falissard Bruno, Lombrail Pierre, Gasquet Isabelle
Inserm, U669, Paris, F-75014 France Univ, Paris-sud 11, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, F-94000 France.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Dec 3;7:197. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-197.
The objective was to solve two problems of an already validated scale measuring inpatient opinion on care: 1) a high non-response rate for some items due to the "not applicable" response option and 2) a skewed score distribution with high ceiling effect.
The EQS-H scale ("échelle de qualité des soins en hospitalisation") comprised 26 items and 2 sub-scales of 13 items each, 'quality of medical information' (MI) and 'relationships with staff and daily routine' (RS). Three studies were conducted: a first mono-centre study (n = 552, response rate = 83.4%, self-completion of the scale the day before discharge) to construct a shorter version of the scale without the items with high non-response rate and maintaining those useful to ensure good internal validity (construct, convergent and divergent) and reliability; a second mono-centre study (n = 1246, response rate = 77.9%, self-completion of the scale before discharge) to confirm psychometric properties of the new version; a third multi-centre national study (n = 886, response rate 41.7%, self-completion at home 15 days after discharge) to test a new response pattern in order to reduce ceiling effect.
Six items having a non-response rate >20% were deleted, increasing rates of exhaustive response to all items from 15% to 48%. Factorial analysis supported the evidence for removing 4 more items to ensure good internal validity and reliability of the new version. These good results (initial variance explained: 43%; Cronbach's alpha: 0.80 (MI) and 0.81 (RS)) were confirmed by the second study. The new response format produced a normalisation of the 2 scores with a large decrease in ceiling effect (25% to 4% for MI subscale and 61% to 8% for RS). Psychometric properties of the final version were excellent: the 2 subscales (8 items each) explained 66% of the variance in principal component analysis, Cronbach's alpha were respectively 0.92 (MI) and 0.93 (RS).
The new version of the EQS-H has better psychometric properties than the previous one. Rates of missing values are lower, and score distribution is normalized. An English version of this scale focused on quality of medical information delivered and on relationship with staff already exists, and this could be useful to conduct cross-cultural studies of health care service quality.
目的是解决一个已被验证的用于衡量住院患者对护理意见的量表存在的两个问题:1)由于“不适用”的回答选项,某些项目的无应答率较高;2)得分分布呈偏态,天花板效应较高。
EQS-H量表(“住院护理质量量表”)由26个项目和2个各包含13个项目的子量表组成,即“医疗信息质量”(MI)和“与医护人员及日常安排的关系”(RS)。进行了三项研究:第一项单中心研究(n = 552,应答率 = 83.4%,在出院前一天自行完成量表),以构建一个较短版本的量表,剔除无应答率高的项目,并保留那些有助于确保良好内部效度(结构效度、收敛效度和区分效度)和信度的项目;第二项单中心研究(n = 1246,应答率 = 77.9%,在出院前自行完成量表),以确认新版本的心理测量特性;第三项全国多中心研究(n = 886,应答率41.7%,出院后15天在家自行完成),以测试一种新的应答模式,以降低天花板效应。
删除了6个无应答率>20%的项目,使所有项目的详尽应答率从15%提高到48%。因子分析支持再删除4个项目的证据,以确保新版本具有良好的内部效度和信度。第二项研究证实了这些良好结果(初始方差解释率:43%;Cronbach's α系数:MI为0.80,RS为0.81)。新的应答格式使两个得分标准化,并大幅降低了天花板效应(MI子量表从25%降至4%,RS子量表从61%降至8%)。最终版本的心理测量特性极佳:两个子量表(各8个项目)在主成分分析中解释了66%的方差,Cronbach's α系数分别为MI 0.92,RS 0.93。
EQS-H量表的新版本比前一版本具有更好的心理测量特性。缺失值率更低,得分分布正常化。该量表已有一个侧重于所提供医疗信息质量和与医护人员关系的英文版本,这可能有助于开展医疗服务质量的跨文化研究。