Suppr超能文献

衡量住院患者护理满意度量表心理测量特性的改善:更高的应答率和天花板效应的降低。

Improvement of psychometric properties of a scale measuring inpatient satisfaction with care: a better response rate and a reduction of the ceiling effect.

作者信息

Moret Leïla, Nguyen Jean-Michel, Pillet Nathalie, Falissard Bruno, Lombrail Pierre, Gasquet Isabelle

机构信息

Inserm, U669, Paris, F-75014 France Univ, Paris-sud 11, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, F-94000 France.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Dec 3;7:197. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-197.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective was to solve two problems of an already validated scale measuring inpatient opinion on care: 1) a high non-response rate for some items due to the "not applicable" response option and 2) a skewed score distribution with high ceiling effect.

METHODS

The EQS-H scale ("échelle de qualité des soins en hospitalisation") comprised 26 items and 2 sub-scales of 13 items each, 'quality of medical information' (MI) and 'relationships with staff and daily routine' (RS). Three studies were conducted: a first mono-centre study (n = 552, response rate = 83.4%, self-completion of the scale the day before discharge) to construct a shorter version of the scale without the items with high non-response rate and maintaining those useful to ensure good internal validity (construct, convergent and divergent) and reliability; a second mono-centre study (n = 1246, response rate = 77.9%, self-completion of the scale before discharge) to confirm psychometric properties of the new version; a third multi-centre national study (n = 886, response rate 41.7%, self-completion at home 15 days after discharge) to test a new response pattern in order to reduce ceiling effect.

RESULTS

Six items having a non-response rate >20% were deleted, increasing rates of exhaustive response to all items from 15% to 48%. Factorial analysis supported the evidence for removing 4 more items to ensure good internal validity and reliability of the new version. These good results (initial variance explained: 43%; Cronbach's alpha: 0.80 (MI) and 0.81 (RS)) were confirmed by the second study. The new response format produced a normalisation of the 2 scores with a large decrease in ceiling effect (25% to 4% for MI subscale and 61% to 8% for RS). Psychometric properties of the final version were excellent: the 2 subscales (8 items each) explained 66% of the variance in principal component analysis, Cronbach's alpha were respectively 0.92 (MI) and 0.93 (RS).

CONCLUSION

The new version of the EQS-H has better psychometric properties than the previous one. Rates of missing values are lower, and score distribution is normalized. An English version of this scale focused on quality of medical information delivered and on relationship with staff already exists, and this could be useful to conduct cross-cultural studies of health care service quality.

摘要

背景

目的是解决一个已被验证的用于衡量住院患者对护理意见的量表存在的两个问题:1)由于“不适用”的回答选项,某些项目的无应答率较高;2)得分分布呈偏态,天花板效应较高。

方法

EQS-H量表(“住院护理质量量表”)由26个项目和2个各包含13个项目的子量表组成,即“医疗信息质量”(MI)和“与医护人员及日常安排的关系”(RS)。进行了三项研究:第一项单中心研究(n = 552,应答率 = 83.4%,在出院前一天自行完成量表),以构建一个较短版本的量表,剔除无应答率高的项目,并保留那些有助于确保良好内部效度(结构效度、收敛效度和区分效度)和信度的项目;第二项单中心研究(n = 1246,应答率 = 77.9%,在出院前自行完成量表),以确认新版本的心理测量特性;第三项全国多中心研究(n = 886,应答率41.7%,出院后15天在家自行完成),以测试一种新的应答模式,以降低天花板效应。

结果

删除了6个无应答率>20%的项目,使所有项目的详尽应答率从15%提高到48%。因子分析支持再删除4个项目的证据,以确保新版本具有良好的内部效度和信度。第二项研究证实了这些良好结果(初始方差解释率:43%;Cronbach's α系数:MI为0.80,RS为0.81)。新的应答格式使两个得分标准化,并大幅降低了天花板效应(MI子量表从25%降至4%,RS子量表从61%降至8%)。最终版本的心理测量特性极佳:两个子量表(各8个项目)在主成分分析中解释了66%的方差,Cronbach's α系数分别为MI 0.92,RS 0.93。

结论

EQS-H量表的新版本比前一版本具有更好的心理测量特性。缺失值率更低,得分分布正常化。该量表已有一个侧重于所提供医疗信息质量和与医护人员关系的英文版本,这可能有助于开展医疗服务质量的跨文化研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9db/2225402/e68e6462a662/1472-6963-7-197-1.jpg

相似文献

2
Patient satisfaction in an acute medicine department in Morocco.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Jun 2;10:149. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-149.

引用本文的文献

1
A transformer-based embedding approach to developing short-form psychological measures.
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 13;16:1640864. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1640864. eCollection 2025.
2
Can a crisis resolution team replace an inpatient ward? Results from a French quasi-experimental study.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Mar 18;25(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12396-3.
3
Development and Validation of the Jawline Subject Satisfaction Scale.
Plast Surg (Oakv). 2024 May 13:22925503241249757. doi: 10.1177/22925503241249757.
4
The Impact of a Pediatric Continuity Care Intensivist Program on Patient and Parent Outcomes: An Unblinded Randomized Controlled Trial.
J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2021 Dec 23;13(2):192-200. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1740360. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Knowledge, attitude, and practice of virtual consultation among outpatients at a teaching hospital in Malaysia.
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 20;18(12):e0289176. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289176. eCollection 2023.
6
Design, Development, and Validation of the Self-Perceived Health Scale (SPHS).
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 12;11(14):2007. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11142007.
8
Patient Satisfaction With Quality of Care at the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Cureus. 2022 Dec 1;14(12):e32102. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32102. eCollection 2022 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Perception and use of the results of patient satisfaction surveys by care providers in a French teaching hospital.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2006 Oct;18(5):359-64. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzl029. Epub 2006 Aug 24.
2
The place of patient satisfaction in quality assessment of lung cancer thoracic surgery.
Chest. 2005 Nov;128(5):3475-81. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.5.3475.
3
A performance assessment framework for hospitals: the WHO regional office for Europe PATH project.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2005 Dec;17(6):487-96. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzi072. Epub 2005 Sep 9.
4
Development and validation of an in-patient satisfaction questionnaire.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2005 Dec;17(6):465-72. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzi067. Epub 2005 Aug 12.
5
The Patient Experiences Questionnaire: development, validity and reliability.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2004 Dec;16(6):453-63. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzh074.
9
Reliability and validity of the Satisfaction with Hospital Care Questionnaire.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2002 Dec;14(6):471-82. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/14.6.471.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验