• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

炎症性肠病(IBD)患者报告体验测量(PREM)的开发:一项以患者为导向的共识工作和“出声思考”研究,用于质量改进计划。

Development of an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) Patient-Reported Experience Measure (PREM): A patient-led consensus work and 'think aloud' study for a quality improvement programme.

机构信息

Sheffield Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Crohn's & Colitis UK, Hatfield, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2023 Feb;26(1):213-225. doi: 10.1111/hex.13647. Epub 2022 Nov 6.

DOI:10.1111/hex.13647
PMID:36335578
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9854292/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) are key in improving healthcare quality, but no PREM exists for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This study aimed to co-produce a PREM with IBD service users for IBD service evaluation and quality improvement programme.

METHODS

A pool of 75 items was drawn from published survey instruments covering interactions with services and aspects of living with IBD. In Stage 1, during two workshops, eight expert service users reduced candidate items through a ranked-choice voting exercise and suggested further items. During Stage 2, 18 previously uninvolved people with IBD assessed the face and content validity of the candidate items in 'Think Aloud' interviews. During two final workshops (Stage 3), the expert service users removed, modified and added items based on the interview findings to produce a final version of the PREM.

RESULTS

Stage 1 generated a draft working PREM mapped to the following four domains: Patient-Centred Care; Quality; Accessibility; Communication and Involvement. The PREM included a set of nine items created by the expert group which shifted the emphasis from 'self-management' to 'living with IBD'. Stage 2 interviews showed that comprehension of the PREM was very good, although there were concerns about the wording, IBD-relevance and ambiguity of some items. During the final two workshops in Stage 3, the expert service users removed 7 items, modified 15 items and added seven new ones based on the interview findings, resulting in a 38-item PREM.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates how extensive service user involvement can inform PREM development.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Patients were involved as active members of the research team and as research participants to co-produce and validate a PREM for IBD services. In Stage 1, eight expert service users ('the expert group') reduced candidate items for the PREM through a voting exercise and suggested new items. During Stage 2, 18 previously uninvolved people with IBD (the 'think aloud' participants) assessed the validity of the candidate items in 'Think Aloud' interviews as research participants. In Stage 3, the expert group removed, changed and added items based on the interview findings to produce a final version of the 38-item PREM. This study shows how service user involvement can meaningfully inform PREM development.

摘要

背景

患者报告体验测量(PREMs)是改善医疗质量的关键,但目前还没有针对炎症性肠病(IBD)的 PREM。本研究旨在为 IBD 服务评估和质量改进计划与 IBD 服务使用者共同制定一个 PREM。

方法

从涵盖与服务互动和 IBD 生活方面的已发表调查工具中抽取了 75 个项目。在第 1 阶段,通过排名选择投票练习,8 名专家服务用户在两次研讨会上减少了候选项目,并提出了其他项目。在第 2 阶段,18 名以前未参与的 IBD 患者在“思考 aloud”访谈中评估候选项目的表面和内容有效性。在最后两次研讨会(第 3 阶段)中,根据访谈结果,专家服务用户删除、修改和添加项目,以生成 PREM 的最终版本。

结果

第 1 阶段生成了一个映射到以下四个领域的 PREM 草案:以患者为中心的护理;质量;可及性;沟通和参与。PREM 包括专家组创建的一组九项内容,将重点从“自我管理”转移到“与 IBD 一起生活”。第 2 阶段的访谈表明,PREM 的理解非常好,尽管有些人对措辞、IBD 相关性和一些项目的模糊性表示担忧。在第 3 阶段的最后两次研讨会上,根据访谈结果,专家服务用户删除了 7 个项目,修改了 15 个项目,并添加了 7 个新项目,最终得到一个 38 项的 PREM。

结论

本研究展示了广泛的服务用户参与如何为 PREM 开发提供信息。

患者或公众的贡献

患者作为研究团队的积极成员和研究参与者参与其中,共同制定和验证了 IBD 服务的 PREM。在第 1 阶段,8 名专家服务用户(“专家组”)通过投票活动减少了 PREM 的候选项目,并提出了新的项目。在第 2 阶段,18 名以前未参与的 IBD 患者(“思考 aloud”参与者)作为研究参与者,在“思考 aloud”访谈中评估了候选项目的有效性。在第 3 阶段,专家组根据访谈结果删除、更改和添加项目,以生成最终版本的 38 项 PREM。这项研究表明,服务用户的参与如何能为 PREM 开发提供有意义的信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d15e/9854292/167c680f3334/HEX-26--g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d15e/9854292/167c680f3334/HEX-26--g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d15e/9854292/167c680f3334/HEX-26--g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) Patient-Reported Experience Measure (PREM): A patient-led consensus work and 'think aloud' study for a quality improvement programme.炎症性肠病(IBD)患者报告体验测量(PREM)的开发:一项以患者为导向的共识工作和“出声思考”研究,用于质量改进计划。
Health Expect. 2023 Feb;26(1):213-225. doi: 10.1111/hex.13647. Epub 2022 Nov 6.
2
Protocol for the development and validation of a patient-reported experience measure (PREM) for people with hearing loss: the PREM-HeLP.用于听力损失患者的患者报告体验测量(PREM)的开发和验证方案:PREM-HeLP。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 29;13(11):e075229. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075229.
3
Involving patients and caregivers to develop items for a new patient-reported experience measure for older adults attending the emergency department. Findings from a nominal group technique study.让患者和护理人员参与制定新的老年急诊患者报告体验量表的项目。名义小组技术研究的结果。
Health Expect. 2023 Oct;26(5):2040-2049. doi: 10.1111/hex.13811. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
4
Developing the Resident Measure of Safety in Care Homes (RMOS): A Delphi and Think Aloud Study.制定居民在养老院中的安全度量标准(RMOS):德尔菲法和出声思维研究。
Health Expect. 2023 Jun;26(3):1149-1158. doi: 10.1111/hex.13730. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
5
Establishing the content validity of a new emergency department patient-reported experience measure (ED PREM): a Delphi study.建立新的急诊部患者报告体验衡量标准(ED PREM)的内容效度:一项德尔菲研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Apr 9;22(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00617-5.
6
Development and validation of a patient reported experience measure for experimental cancer medicines (PREM-ECM) and their carers (PREM-ECM-Carer).开发并验证了一种用于实验性癌症药物(PREM-ECM)及其护理人员的患者报告体验测量工具(PREM-ECM-Carer)。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Apr 19;24(1):500. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-11963-x.
7
Public involvement in health outcomes research: lessons learnt from the development of the recovering quality of life (ReQoL) measures.公众参与健康结局研究:从恢复生活质量(ReQoL)措施的制定中汲取的经验教训。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Apr 11;17(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1123-z.
8
Development and content validity testing of a colonoscopy-specific patient-reported experience measure: the Patient Experience Colonoscopy Scale (PECS).开发并对结肠镜检查特异性患者报告体验量表(PECS)进行内容效度检验。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Mar 18;8(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00710-2.
9
Improving the methods for patient-reported experience measures in palliative care: findings from a cognitive interview study.改善姑息治疗中患者报告体验测量方法:认知访谈研究的结果。
Ann Palliat Med. 2022 Jul;11(7):2275-2284. doi: 10.21037/apm-22-9. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
10
Measuring patients' experience with renal services in the UK: development and validation of the Kidney PREM.测量英国肾脏服务患者体验: Kidney PREM 的开发与验证。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2022 Jul 26;37(8):1507-1519. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfac030.

引用本文的文献

1
Engaging people with lived experience of psychological disorders: Current research and future directions for community-engaged measure development in psychological science.让有心理障碍亲身经历的人参与进来:心理学领域社区参与式测量发展的当前研究与未来方向。
Clin Psychol Sci. 2025 Jul;13(4):720-739. doi: 10.1177/21677026241304339. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
2
Development of the First Patient-Reported Experience Measure (PREM) for Hearing Loss in Audiology Care-My Hearing PREM.开发用于听力学护理的首个患者报告的听力损失体验测量工具(PREM)-我的听力 PREM。
Health Expect. 2024 Dec;27(6):e70088. doi: 10.1111/hex.70088.
3
Inequalities in Healthcare Access, Experience and Outcomes in Adults With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Scoping Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests.定性研究中饱和度的样本量:实证检验的系统综述。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114523. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
2
Metaphors of organizations in patient involvement programs: connections and contradictions.患者参与项目中组织的隐喻:联系与矛盾。
J Health Organ Manag. 2021 Mar 30;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print):177-94. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-07-2020-0292.
3
Measuring Patient Experience in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Care: A Key Component of Continuous Quality Improvement.
炎症性肠病成年患者在医疗服务可及性、就医体验和治疗结果方面的不平等:一项范围综述
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2024 Dec 5;30(12):2486-2499. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izae077.
衡量炎症性肠病护理中的患者体验:持续质量改进的关键组成部分。
J Crohns Colitis. 2021 Mar 5;15(3):347-348. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaa221.
4
Patient satisfaction and patient experience are not interchangeable concepts.患者满意度和患者体验并非可互换的概念。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Feb 20;33(1). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab023.
5
Sustained type 1 diabetes self-management: Specifying the behaviours involved and their influences.持续的 1 型糖尿病自我管理:具体涉及的行为及其影响。
Diabet Med. 2021 May;38(5):e14430. doi: 10.1111/dme.14430. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
6
WE-CARE IBD SCORE: Assessing High-quality Care From the Perspective of Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.WE-CARE IBD 评分:从炎症性肠病患者的角度评估高质量的医疗护理。
J Crohns Colitis. 2021 Mar 5;15(3):349-357. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaa174.
7
Developing Behavior Change Interventions for Self-Management in Chronic Illness: An Integrative Overview.为慢性病自我管理制定行为改变干预措施:综合概述
Eur Psychol. 2019;24(1):7-25. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040/a000330. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
8
A systematic review of the validity and reliability of patient-reported experience measures.患者报告体验测量的有效性和可靠性的系统评价。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct;54(5):1023-1035. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13187. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
9
An exploration of how domains of quality of care relate to overall care experience.对医疗质量领域如何与整体医疗体验相关联的探索。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2019 Jun 10;32(5):844-856. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-07-2018-0183.
10
Patient experiences: a systematic review of quality improvement interventions in a hospital setting.患者体验:对医院环境中质量改进干预措施的系统评价
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2019 May 21;10:157-169. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S201737. eCollection 2019.