Borneman Tami, Piper Barbara F, Sun Virginia Chih-Yi, Koczywas Marianna, Uman Gwen, Ferrell Betty
Department of Nursing Research & Education, Division of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 E. Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010, USA.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2007 Nov;5(10):1092-101. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2007.0090.
Fatigue, despite being the most common and distressing symptom in cancer, is often unrelieved because of numerous patient, provider, and system barriers. The overall purpose of this 5-year prospective clinical trial is to translate the NCCN Cancer-Related Fatigue Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology and NCCN Adult Cancer Pain Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology into practice and develop a translational interventional model that can be replicated across settings. This article focuses on one NCCN member institution's experience related to the first phase of the NCCN Cancer-Related Fatigue Guidelines implementation, describing usual care compared with evidence-based guidelines. Phase 1 of this 3-phased clinical trial compared the usual care of fatigue with that administered according to the NCCN guidelines. Eligibility criteria included age 18 years or older; English-speaking; diagnosed with breast, lung, colon, or prostate cancer; and fatigue and/or pain ratings of 4 or more on a 0 to 10 screening scale. Research nurses screened all available subjects in a cancer center medical oncology clinic to identify those meeting these criteria. Instruments included the Piper Fatigue Scale, a Fatigue Barriers Scale, a Fatigue Knowledge Scale, and a Fatigue Chart Audit Tool. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used in data analysis. At baseline, 45 patients had fatigue only (> or = 4) and 24 had both fatigue and pain (> or = 4). This combined sample (N = 69) was predominantly Caucasian (65%), female (63%), an average of 60 years old, diagnosed with stage 3 or 4 breast cancer, and undergoing treatment (82%). The most common barriers noted were patients' belief that physicians would introduce the subject of fatigue if it was important (patient barrier); lack of fatigue documentation (professional barrier); and lack of supportive care referrals (system barrier). Findings showed several patient, professional, and system barriers that distinguish usual care from that recommended by the NCCN Cancer-Related Fatigue Guidelines. Phase 2, the intervention model, is designed to decrease these barriers and improve patient outcomes over time, and is in progress.
疲劳虽是癌症患者最常见且令人痛苦的症状,但由于患者、医护人员及医疗系统存在诸多障碍,这一症状往往难以缓解。这项为期5年的前瞻性临床试验的总体目的是将美国国立综合癌症网络(NCCN)的《肿瘤学相关癌症疲劳临床实践指南》和《肿瘤学成人癌症疼痛临床实践指南》付诸实践,并开发一种可在不同环境中复制的转化干预模型。本文聚焦于一家NCCN成员机构在实施NCCN癌症相关疲劳指南第一阶段的经验,描述常规护理与循证指南的对比情况。这项三阶段临床试验的第一阶段将疲劳的常规护理与依据NCCN指南提供的护理进行了比较。纳入标准包括:年龄18岁及以上;讲英语;诊断为乳腺癌、肺癌、结肠癌或前列腺癌;在0至10分的筛查量表上疲劳和/或疼痛评分达到4分及以上。研究护士在一家癌症中心的肿瘤内科诊所对所有可及的受试者进行筛查,以确定符合这些标准的患者。所使用的工具包括派珀疲劳量表、疲劳障碍量表、疲劳知识量表和疲劳图表审核工具。数据分析采用描述性和推断性统计方法。在基线时,45名患者仅有疲劳(评分≥4),24名患者同时存在疲劳和疼痛(评分≥4)。这个合并样本(N = 69)主要为白人(65%)、女性(63%),平均年龄60岁,诊断为3期或4期乳腺癌,且正在接受治疗(82%)。所指出的最常见障碍包括:患者认为如果疲劳问题重要,医生会主动提及(患者障碍);缺乏疲劳记录(专业障碍);以及缺乏支持性护理转诊(系统障碍)。研究结果显示了一些患者、专业人员和系统方面的障碍,这些障碍使得常规护理与NCCN癌症相关疲劳指南所推荐的护理有所不同。第二阶段即干预模型,旨在随着时间推移减少这些障碍并改善患者预后,目前正在进行中。