Block Keith I, Gyllenhaal Charlotte, Grutsch James F, Block Penny B, Kazlausky Thomas, Blask David, Carome Edward, Reynolds Justin, Huff Dinah Faith Q, Hrushesky William
Block Center for Integrative Cancer Treatment, Skokie, IL, USA.
Department of Medical Education, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
SAGE Open Med. 2022 May 23;10:20503121221100137. doi: 10.1177/20503121221100137. eCollection 2022.
Cancer patients routinely exhibit dysfunctional circadian organization. Indeed, a dysfunctional circadian organization is a hallmark of advanced cancer. A cohort of advanced cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy was recruited to investigate whether manipulating exposure to blue light could restore or ameliorate their circadian organization.
Thirty advanced metastatic cancer patients participated in a randomized crossover trial to evaluate whether blue light-blocking night-simulating eyeglasses could ameliorate a disrupted circadian organization better than sham eyeglasses. Circadian organization was evaluated by actigraphy and patients' self-reports of sleep, fatigue, and quality of life. Kruskal-Wallis tests compared patients' outcomes in circadian organization with a cohort of non-cancer, disease-free individuals with normal sleep as a negative control, and with advanced cancer patients with disrupted circadian organization as a positive control. Quality-of-life outcomes of the patients were compared with population-based controls (negative controls) and with cohorts of advanced cancer patients (positive controls).
Actigraphy measurements, self-reported sleep, fatigue levels, and quality-of-life outcomes of trial participants were similar to those of negative controls with a normal circadian organization, in spite of the trial patients' concurrent chemotherapy. Night-simulating glasses did not improve circadian organization. The 24-h correlation of day-to-day rhythms of rest and activity was 0.455 for the experimental eyeglasses and 0.476 for the sham eyeglasses ( = 0.258). Actigraphic and patient-reported outcomes compared favorably to outcomes of positive controls.
The circadian organization of patients in this study unexpectedly resembled that of healthy controls and was better than comparison populations with disrupted circadian organization. The study clinic implements chronomodulated chemotherapy and a systematic, supportive integrative treatment protocol. Results suggest a need for further research on interventions for circadian rhythm. Although the study intervention did not benefit the participants, this work highlights the value of supporting circadian time structure in advanced cancer patients.
癌症患者通常表现出昼夜节律紊乱。事实上,昼夜节律紊乱是晚期癌症的一个标志。招募了一组正在接受化疗的晚期癌症患者,以研究控制蓝光暴露是否能恢复或改善他们的昼夜节律。
30名晚期转移性癌症患者参与了一项随机交叉试验,以评估夜间模拟蓝光阻挡眼镜是否比假眼镜能更好地改善昼夜节律紊乱。通过活动记录仪以及患者对睡眠、疲劳和生活质量的自我报告来评估昼夜节律。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验,将患者的昼夜节律结果与一组睡眠正常的无癌症、无疾病个体作为阴性对照进行比较,并与昼夜节律紊乱的晚期癌症患者作为阳性对照进行比较。将患者的生活质量结果与基于人群的对照(阴性对照)以及晚期癌症患者队列(阳性对照)进行比较。
尽管试验患者同时接受化疗,但试验参与者的活动记录仪测量结果、自我报告的睡眠、疲劳水平和生活质量结果与昼夜节律正常的阴性对照相似。夜间模拟眼镜并未改善昼夜节律。实验眼镜的日常休息和活动节律的24小时相关性为0.455,假眼镜为0.476(P = 0.258)。活动记录仪和患者报告的结果优于阳性对照的结果。
本研究中患者的昼夜节律出人意料地与健康对照相似,且优于昼夜节律紊乱的对照人群。该研究诊所实施了时辰调制化疗以及系统的、支持性的综合治疗方案。结果表明需要对昼夜节律干预措施进行进一步研究。尽管该研究干预措施对参与者没有益处,但这项工作凸显了支持晚期癌症患者昼夜时间结构的价值。