Koreen Susan, Gelman Rony, Martinez-Perez M Elena, Jiang Lei, Berrocal Audina M, Hess Ditte J, Flynn John T, Chiang Michael F
Department of Ophthalmology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York 10032, USA.
Ophthalmology. 2007 Dec;114(12):e59-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.10.006.
To measure accuracy and reliability of the computer-based Retinal Image Multiscale Analysis (RISA) system compared with those of recognized retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) experts, for plus disease diagnosis.
Evaluation of diagnostic test or technology.
Eleven recognized ROP experts and the RISA image analysis system interpreted a set of 20 wide-angle retinal photographs for presence of plus disease.
All experts used a secure Web site to review independently 20 images for presence of plus disease. Images were also analyzed by measuring individual computer-based system parameters (integrated curvature [IC], diameter, and tortuosity index) for arterioles and venules and by computing linear combinations and logical combinations of those parameters. Performance was compared with a reference standard, defined as the majority vote of experts.
Diagnostic accuracy was measured by calculating sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC) for plus disease diagnosis by each expert, and by each computer-based system parameter, compared with the reference standard. Diagnostic agreement was measured by calculating the mean kappa value of each expert compared with all other experts and the mean kappa value of each computer-based system parameter compared with all experts.
Among the 11 experts, sensitivity ranged from 0.167 to 1.000, specificity ranged from 0.714 to 1.000, AUC ranged from 0.798 to 1.000, and mean kappa compared with all other experts ranged from 0.288 to 0.689. Among individual computer system parameters, arteriolar IC had the highest diagnostic accuracy, with sensitivity of 1.000; specificity, 0.846; and AUC, 0.962. Arteriolar IC had the highest diagnostic agreement with experts, with a mean kappa value of 0.578.
A computer-based image analysis system has the potential to perform comparably to recognized ROP experts for plus disease diagnosis.
为诊断附加病变,比较基于计算机的视网膜图像多尺度分析(RISA)系统与公认的早产儿视网膜病变(ROP)专家的诊断准确性和可靠性。
诊断试验或技术评估。
11位公认的ROP专家和RISA图像分析系统对一组20张广角视网膜照片进行附加病变评估。
所有专家通过安全网站独立查看20张照片以评估附加病变。还通过测量基于计算机系统的小动脉和小静脉的个体参数(综合曲率[IC]、直径和迂曲指数)以及计算这些参数的线性组合和逻辑组合来分析图像。将表现与定义为专家多数投票的参考标准进行比较。
通过计算每位专家以及基于计算机系统的每个参数诊断附加病变时的灵敏度、特异度和曲线下面积(AUC)来衡量诊断准确性,并与参考标准进行比较。通过计算每位专家与所有其他专家比较的平均kappa值以及基于计算机系统的每个参数与所有专家比较的平均kappa值来衡量诊断一致性。
在11位专家中,灵敏度范围为0.167至1.000,特异度范围为0.714至1.000,AUC范围为0.798至1.000,与所有其他专家比较的平均kappa值范围为0.288至0.689。在基于计算机系统的个体参数中,小动脉IC具有最高的诊断准确性,灵敏度为1.000;特异度为0.846;AUC为0.962。小动脉IC与专家的诊断一致性最高,平均kappa值为0.578。
基于计算机的图像分析系统在诊断附加病变方面有潜力与公认的ROP专家表现相当。