Lee Jason Jonghyuk, Nettey-Marbell Anthony, Cook Archie, Pimenta Luiz A F, Leonard Ralph, Ritter André V
School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
J Am Dent Assoc. 2007 Dec;138(12):1599-603. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0110.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has adopted guidelines for infection control of extracted teeth used for research and teaching, requiring that teeth be sterilized before use. The authors conducted a study to test the null hypothesis that the storage medium and sterilization method have no effect on composite-to-dentin bond strengths.
The authors collected 170 bovine incisors, cleaned them and placed them randomly into one of six storage media at 37 degrees C for 60 days: distilled water (dH(2)O), 0.9 percent sodium chloride, 0.5 percent chloramine-T, 5.25 percent sodium hypochlorite (NaClO), 2 percent glutaraldehyde and 10 percent formalin. For sterilization, they autoclaved a subset of 10 specimens from every sample, while they stored another subset of 10 specimens from every sample (except for the 10 percent formalin sample) in 10 percent formalin for 14 days. The authors then embedded the specimens in epoxy and ground flat the facial surface to expose middle-depth dentin, which they polished to 600 grit. They used a dental adhesive to apply composite to the exposed dentin. The authors tested the composite-to-dentin shear bond strength 24 hours after bonding. They analyzed the data using global analysis of variance and, when appropriate, multiple post hoc tests (P = .05).
Storage in NaClO resulted in significantly lower bond strength than that of the other treatment specimens. Sterilization with the autoclave negatively affected the bond strength of specimens stored initially in dH(2)O or 10 percent formalin, while sterilization with formalin alone had no significant effect on bond strengths.
Storing bovine teeth in 5.25 percent NaClO may negatively affect composite-to-dentin bond strengths. Immersion in 10 percent formalin might be the best option for storage and sterilization of bovine teeth that are to be used in dental bonding studies in vitro.
美国疾病控制与预防中心已采用用于研究和教学的拔除牙齿的感染控制指南,要求牙齿在使用前进行消毒。作者进行了一项研究,以检验储存介质和消毒方法对复合材料与牙本质粘结强度没有影响这一零假设。
作者收集了170颗牛切牙,进行清洁并随机放入六种储存介质之一中,在37℃下保存60天:蒸馏水(dH₂O)、0.9%氯化钠、0.5%氯胺-T、5.25%次氯酸钠(NaClO)、2%戊二醛和10%福尔马林。对于消毒,他们对每个样本中的10个标本进行高压灭菌处理;同时,将每个样本中的另外10个标本(10%福尔马林样本除外)在10%福尔马林中保存14天。然后,作者将标本嵌入环氧树脂中,将唇面磨平以暴露中层牙本质,并将其抛光至600目。他们使用牙科粘合剂将复合材料应用于暴露的牙本质上。在粘结24小时后测试复合材料与牙本质的剪切粘结强度。作者使用方差全局分析对数据进行分析,并在适当情况下进行多个事后检验(P = 0.05)。
储存在NaClO中的粘结强度明显低于其他处理标本。高压灭菌对最初储存在dH₂O或10%福尔马林中的标本的粘结强度有负面影响,而仅用福尔马林消毒对粘结强度没有显著影响。
将牛牙储存在5.25%的NaClO中可能会对复合材料与牙本质的粘结强度产生负面影响。对于体外牙粘结研究中使用的牛牙,浸入10%福尔马林可能是储存和消毒的最佳选择。