James Michael Lucas, Warner David S, Laskowitz Daniel T
Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3094, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Neurocrit Care. 2008;9(1):139-52. doi: 10.1007/s12028-007-9030-2.
Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a devastating and relatively common disease affecting as many as 50,000 people annually in the United States alone. ICH remains associated with poor outcome, and approximately 40-50% of afflicted patients will die within 30 days. In reports from the NIH and AHA, the importance of developing clinically relevant models of ICH that will extend our understanding of the pathophysiology of the disease and target new therapeutic approaches was emphasized. Traditionally, preclinical ICH research has most commonly utilized two paradigms: clostridial collagenase-induced hemorrhage and autologous blood injection. In this article, the use of various species is examined in the context of the different model types for ICH, and a mechanistic approach is considered in evaluating the numerous breakthroughs in our current fund of knowledge. Each of the model types has its inherent strengths and weaknesses and has the potential to further our understanding of the pathophysiology and treatment of ICH. In particular, transgenic rodent models may be helpful in addressing genetic influences on recovery from ICH.
脑出血(ICH)是一种严重且相对常见的疾病,仅在美国每年就有多达5万人受其影响。脑出血的预后仍然很差,约40%-50%的患者会在30天内死亡。在美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)和美国心脏协会(AHA)的报告中,强调了开发具有临床相关性的脑出血模型的重要性,这将扩展我们对该疾病病理生理学的理解并靶向新的治疗方法。传统上,临床前脑出血研究最常用两种模式:梭菌胶原酶诱导出血和自体血注射。在本文中,将在不同类型的脑出血模型背景下研究各种物种的使用情况,并考虑一种机制方法来评估我们当前知识储备中的众多突破。每种模型类型都有其固有的优点和缺点,并且有潜力进一步加深我们对脑出血病理生理学和治疗的理解。特别是,转基因啮齿动物模型可能有助于解决基因对脑出血恢复的影响。