• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语言、神秘主义与催眠易感性:一则简短通讯

Language, mysticism, and hypnotizability: a brief communication.

作者信息

Adams Peter J

机构信息

University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2008 Jan;56(1):73-82. doi: 10.1080/00207140701673100.

DOI:10.1080/00207140701673100
PMID:18058488
Abstract

People attempting to communicate religious and mystical experiences tend to use the same language strategies employed in inducing hypnotic trance. Both incorporate vague language that provides receptive listeners the opportunity to insert their own content. This study examines whether people who have had mystical or religious experiences are also more likely to respond to the language of hypnosis. Eighty-one participants completed the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A and the Hood Mysticism Scale. Participants were divided into 3 equal groups based on "high," "ambiguous," and "low" mysticism scale scores. The high group scored significantly higher on hypnotizability compared to the low group. The relationship between openness to mystical and religious experience and susceptibility to hypnotic suggestion warrants further investigation.

摘要

试图传达宗教和神秘体验的人往往会采用诱导催眠状态时使用的相同语言策略。两者都使用模糊语言,为善于接纳的听众提供了插入自己想法的机会。本研究调查有神秘或宗教体验的人是否也更有可能对催眠语言做出反应。81名参与者完成了哈佛团体催眠易感性量表A版和胡德神秘主义量表。参与者根据神秘主义量表得分的“高”、“模糊”和“低”分为3组。与低分组相比,高分组在催眠易感性方面得分显著更高。对神秘和宗教体验的开放性与对催眠暗示的易感性之间的关系值得进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Language, mysticism, and hypnotizability: a brief communication.语言、神秘主义与催眠易感性:一则简短通讯
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2008 Jan;56(1):73-82. doi: 10.1080/00207140701673100.
2
Hypnotizability, the dissociative experiences scale, HGSHS: A amnesia, and automatic writing: is there an association?催眠易感性、分离体验量表、哈佛群体催眠易感性量表A版中的遗忘症以及自动书写:它们之间存在关联吗?
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 1997 Jan;45(1):69-80. doi: 10.1080/00207149708416107.
3
Hypnotizability, sleepiness, and subjective experience.催眠易感性、困意和主观体验。
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2011 Apr;59(2):211-24. doi: 10.1080/00207144.2011.546220.
4
Response expectancy as a mediator of hypnotizability modification: a brief communication.期望反应作为催眠易感性改变的中介变量:一篇简短通讯
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 1993 Apr;41(2):84-91. doi: 10.1080/00207149308414539.
5
Not all group hypnotic suggestibility scales are created equal: individual differences in behavioral and subjective responses.并非所有的团体催眠易感性量表都是一样的:行为和主观反应存在个体差异。
Conscious Cogn. 2009 Mar;18(1):255-65. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2008.07.006. Epub 2008 Sep 7.
6
A note of caution on the Waterloo-Stanford Group Scale of hypnotic susceptibility: a brief communication.关于滑铁卢-斯坦福团体催眠易感性量表的一则警示:简短通讯
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2009 Apr;57(2):222-6. doi: 10.1080/00207140802665484.
7
A multivariate approach to the prediction of hypnotic susceptibility.一种预测催眠易感性的多变量方法。
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 1996 Jul;44(3):250-64. doi: 10.1080/00207149608416086.
8
Swedish norms for the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A.
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2003 Oct;51(4):348-56. doi: 10.1076/iceh.51.4.348.16414.
9
Responsiveness to direct versus indirect hypnotic procedures: the role of resistance as a predictor variable.对直接与间接催眠程序的反应性:抵抗作为预测变量的作用。
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 1998 Oct;46(4):324-33. doi: 10.1080/00207149808410012.
10
Subjective scoring for the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A.哈佛群体催眠易感性量表A式的主观评分
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 1990 Apr;38(2):112-24. doi: 10.1080/00207149008414506.