• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

死刑与解剖学:一段持续关联的历史与伦理

Capital punishment and anatomy: history and ethics of an ongoing association.

作者信息

Hildebrandt S

机构信息

Division of Anatomical Sciences, Office of Medical Education, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0608, USA.

出版信息

Clin Anat. 2008 Jan;21(1):5-14. doi: 10.1002/ca.20571.

DOI:10.1002/ca.20571
PMID:18058917
Abstract

Anatomical science has used the bodies of the executed for dissection over many centuries. As anatomy has developed into a vehicle of not only scientific but also moral and ethical education, it is important to consider the source of human bodies for dissection and the manner of their acquisition. From the thirteenth to the early seventeenth century, the bodies of the executed were the only legal source of bodies for dissection. Starting in the late seventeenth century, the bodies of unclaimed persons were also made legally available. With the developing movement to abolish the death penalty in many countries around the world and with the renunciation of the use of the bodies of the executed by the British legal system in the nineteenth century, two different practices have developed in that there are Anatomy Departments who use the bodies of the executed for dissection or research and those who do not. The history of the use of bodies of the executed in German Anatomy Departments during the National Socialist regime is an example for the insidious slide from an ethical use of human bodies in dissection to an unethical one. There are cases of contemporary use of unclaimed or donated bodies of the executed, but they are rarely well documented. The intention of this review is to initiate an ethical discourse about the use of the bodies of the executed in contemporary anatomy.

摘要

几个世纪以来,解剖学一直利用被处决者的尸体进行解剖。随着解剖学不仅发展成为科学教育的工具,还成为道德和伦理教育的工具,考虑用于解剖的人体来源及其获取方式就变得很重要。从13世纪到17世纪初,被处决者的尸体是唯一合法的解剖用尸体来源。从17世纪后期开始,无人认领者的尸体也被合法提供用于解剖。随着世界上许多国家废除死刑运动的发展,以及英国法律体系在19世纪放弃使用被处决者的尸体,出现了两种不同的做法:有些解剖学系使用被处决者的尸体进行解剖或研究,而有些则不使用。纳粹政权时期德国解剖学系使用被处决者尸体的历史,就是一个从在解剖中道德使用人体到不道德使用人体的阴险转变的例子。当代有使用无人认领或捐赠的被处决者尸体的情况,但相关记录很少。这篇综述的目的是引发一场关于当代解剖学中使用被处决者尸体的伦理讨论。

相似文献

1
Capital punishment and anatomy: history and ethics of an ongoing association.死刑与解剖学:一段持续关联的历史与伦理
Clin Anat. 2008 Jan;21(1):5-14. doi: 10.1002/ca.20571.
2
Inception of cadaver dissection and its relevance in present day scenario of medical education.尸体解剖的起源及其在当今医学教育场景中的相关性。
J Indian Med Assoc. 2006 Jun;104(6):331-3.
3
Anatomy. Confronting anatomy's Nazi past.解剖学。直面解剖学的纳粹历史。
Science. 2010 Jul 16;329(5989):274-5. doi: 10.1126/science.329.5989.274-a.
4
A glimpse into the process of gaining permission for the educational dissection of human cadavers in the Ottoman Empire.一窥奥斯曼帝国时期获得人体尸体教育解剖许可的过程。
Clin Anat. 2014 Oct;27(7):964-71. doi: 10.1002/ca.22421. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
5
[History of collecting cadavers in Japan].[日本的尸体收集历史]
Kaibogaku Zasshi. 2007 Mar;82(1):33-6.
6
The evolution of the study of anatomy in Japan.日本解剖学研究的发展历程。
Clin Anat. 2009 May;22(4):425-35. doi: 10.1002/ca.20781.
7
[The teaching of anatomy through the centuries by the "theater" and the book].[几个世纪以来通过“解剖剧场”和书籍进行的解剖学教学]
Rev Lyon Med. 1969 Nov 30;17(18):723-37.
8
The fate of the bodies of executed persons in the Anatomical Institute of Halle between 1933 and 1945.1933 年至 1945 年间,哈雷解剖学研究所中被处决者遗体的命运。
Ann Anat. 2012 Jun;194(3):274-80. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2011.08.008. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
9
[History of anatomy in Lyon].[里昂的解剖学史]
Bull Assoc Anat (Nancy). 1978 Jun;62(177):177-215.
10
Let the dead teach the living: the rise of body bequeathal in 20th-century America.让逝者教导生者:20世纪美国遗体捐赠的兴起。
Acad Med. 2007 Oct;82(10):1000-5. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318149e986.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethics on academic procurement of cadavers.尸体学术采购的伦理问题。
Bioinformation. 2024 Aug 31;20(8):872-876. doi: 10.6026/973206300200872. eCollection 2024.
2
Technical skills simulation in transplant surgery: a systematic review.移植手术中的技术技能模拟:一项系统综述。
Global Surg Educ. 2022;1(1):42. doi: 10.1007/s44186-022-00028-x. Epub 2022 Sep 17.
3
The Sun Also Rises: Tracing the evolution of humanistic values in anatomy pedagogy and research, including cadaveric acquisition practices.《太阳照常升起》:追踪人体解剖学教学和研究中人文价值观的演变,包括尸体采集实践。
J Anat. 2023 Dec;243(6):1031-1051. doi: 10.1111/joa.13938. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
4
The Third Dimension: 3D Printed Replicas and Other Alternatives to Cadaver-Based Learning.三维维度:3D打印复制品及基于尸体学习的其他替代方式
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2023;1421:39-61. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-30379-1_3.
5
Advances in Digital Technology in Teaching Human Anatomy: Ethical Predicaments.数字技术在人体解剖学教学中的应用进展:伦理困境。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2022;1388:173-191. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-10889-1_8.
6
Building a Low-Cost and Low-Fidelity Kidney Transplant Model: A Technical Report on the San Antonio Kidney Transplant Model.构建低成本、低逼真度的肾移植模型:关于圣安东尼奥肾移植模型的技术报告
Cureus. 2022 Apr 6;14(4):e23883. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23883. eCollection 2022 Apr.
7
Moving From Organ Donation to Knowledge Donation: A Novel Opportunity for Surgical Education Following Organ Donation.从器官捐赠到知识捐赠:器官捐赠后外科教育的新机遇。
Cureus. 2020 Sep 15;12(9):e10473. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10473.
8
The practice of ethics in the context of human dissection: Setting standards for future physicians.人体解剖学中伦理学的实践:为未来的医生设定标准。
Ann Anat. 2020 Nov;232:151577. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2020.151577. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
9
Review of the effect of 3D medical printing and virtual reality on urology training with ‘MedTRain3DModsim’ Erasmus + European Union Project.《“MedTRain3DModsim”伊拉斯谟+欧盟项目对泌尿外科培训中 3D 医学打印和虚拟现实效果的回顾》。
Turk J Med Sci. 2019 Oct 24;49(5):1257-1270. doi: 10.3906/sag-1905-73.
10
[History of the anatomical and clinical autopsy].[解剖学与临床尸检的历史]
Pathologe. 2019 Feb;40(1):93-100. doi: 10.1007/s00292-018-0461-7.