Suppr超能文献

择期性和急性腹主动脉瘤的峰值壁应力测量

Peak wall stress measurement in elective and acute abdominal aortic aneurysms.

作者信息

Heng Michael S, Fagan Michael J, Collier Jason W, Desai Grishma, McCollum Peter T, Chetter Ian C

机构信息

Academic Vascular Surgery, Hull Royal Infirmary, Anlaby Road, Hull, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2008 Jan;47(1):17-22; discussion 22. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.09.002. Epub 2007 Dec 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture occurs when wall stress exceeds wall strength. Engineering principles suggest that aneurysm diameter is only one aspect of its geometry that influences wall stress. Finite element analysis considers the complete geometry and determines wall stresses throughout the structure. This article investigates the interoperator and intraoperator reliability of finite element analysis in the calculation of peak wall stress (PWS) in AAA and examines the variation in PWS in elective and acute AAAs.

METHOD

Full ethics and institutional approval was obtained. The study recruited 70 patients (30 acute, 40 elective) with an infrarenal AAA. Computed tomography (CT) images were obtained of the AAA from the renal vessels to the aortic bifurcation. Manual edge extraction, three-dimensional reconstruction, and blinded finite element analysis were performed to ascertain location and value of PWS. Ten CT data sets were analyzed by four different operators to ascertain interoperator reliability and by one operator twice to ascertain intraoperator reliability. An intraclass correlation coefficient was obtained. The Mann-Whitney U test and independent samples t test compared groups for statistical significance.

RESULTS

The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.71 for interoperator reliability and 0.84 for intraoperator reliability. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean (SD) maximal AAA diameter between elective (6.47 [1.30] cm) and acute (7.08 [1.39] cm) patients (P = .073). The difference in PWS between elective (0.67 [0.30] MPa) and acute (1.11 [0.51] MPa) patients (P = .008) was statistically significant, however.

CONCLUSION

Interoperator and intraoperator reliability in the derivation of PWS is acceptable. PWS, but not maximal diameter, was significantly higher in acute AAAs than in elective AAAs.

摘要

背景

腹主动脉瘤(AAA)破裂发生在壁应力超过壁强度时。工程原理表明,动脉瘤直径只是影响壁应力的几何形状的一个方面。有限元分析考虑了完整的几何形状,并确定了整个结构中的壁应力。本文研究了有限元分析在计算AAA峰值壁应力(PWS)时的操作者间和操作者内可靠性,并研究了择期和急性AAA中PWS的变化。

方法

获得了全面的伦理和机构批准。该研究招募了70例患有肾下腹主动脉瘤的患者(30例急性,40例择期)。从肾血管到主动脉分叉处获取了腹主动脉瘤的计算机断层扫描(CT)图像。进行了手动边缘提取、三维重建和盲法有限元分析,以确定PWS的位置和值。由四名不同的操作者分析了十个CT数据集以确定操作者间的可靠性,并由一名操作者分析两次以确定操作者内的可靠性。获得了组内相关系数。使用Mann-Whitney U检验和独立样本t检验比较组间差异的统计学意义。

结果

操作者间可靠性的组内相关系数为0.71,操作者内可靠性的组内相关系数为0.84。择期患者(6.47 [1.30] cm)和急性患者(7.08 [1.39] cm)之间的平均(标准差)最大腹主动脉瘤直径无统计学显著差异(P = 0.073)。然而,择期患者(0.67 [0.30] MPa)和急性患者(1.11 [0.51] MPa)之间的PWS差异具有统计学显著性(P = 0.008)。

结论

推导PWS时的操作者间和操作者内可靠性是可以接受的。急性AAA中的PWS显著高于择期AAA,但最大直径并非如此。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验