Hanno Philip M
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 9 Penn Tower, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Urol Clin North Am. 2008 Feb;35(1):91-9; vii. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2007.09.011.
Since the postulation of an "antiproliferative factor" in 1998 and a description, six years later, of this putative central protein in the etiologic pathway of the painful bladder syndrome/interstitial cystitis, there have been no dramatic breakthroughs in the field. Although much potentially exciting work is in progress with regard to epidemiology, etiology, and clinical treatment, many clinicians and researchers have used this hiatus to take another look at what exactly is being studied and how the syndrome should be approached. This article explores some of the current "hot-button" issues of definition and nomenclature that have formed the basis of many international meetings in the last 5 years.
自1998年提出“抗增殖因子”假说,并于六年后对这种假定的核心蛋白在疼痛性膀胱综合征/间质性膀胱炎病因途径中的作用进行描述以来,该领域一直没有重大突破。尽管在流行病学、病因学和临床治疗方面有许多潜在的激动人心的工作正在进行,但许多临床医生和研究人员利用这段停滞期重新审视正在研究的到底是什么,以及应该如何处理该综合征。本文探讨了一些当前有关定义和命名的“热点”问题,这些问题构成了过去五年许多国际会议的基础。