Dieckmann Ania, Rieskamp Jörg
Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.
Mem Cognit. 2007 Oct;35(7):1801-13. doi: 10.3758/bf03193511.
Information redundancy affects the accuracy of inference strategies. A simulation study illustrates that under high-information redundancy simple heuristics that rely on only the most important information are as accurate as strategies that integrate all available information, whereas under low redundancy integrating information becomes advantageous. Assuming that people exercise adaptive strategy selection, it is predicted that their inferences will more often be captured by simple heuristics that focus on part of the available information insituations ofhigh-information redundancy, especially when information search is costly. This prediction is confirmed in two experiments. The participants' task was to repeatedly infer which of two alternatives, described by several cues, had a higher criterion value. In the first experiment, simple heuristics predicted the inference process better under high-information redundancy than under low-information redundancy. In the second experiment, this result could be generalized to an inference situation in which participants had no prior opportunity to learn about the strategies' accuracies through outcome feedback. The results demonstrate that people are able to respond adaptively to different decision environments under various learning opportunities.
信息冗余会影响推理策略的准确性。一项模拟研究表明,在高信息冗余情况下,仅依赖最重要信息的简单启发式策略与整合所有可用信息的策略一样准确,而在低冗余情况下,整合信息则更具优势。假设人们会进行适应性策略选择,那么可以预测,在高信息冗余情况下,他们的推理将更多地被专注于部分可用信息的简单启发式策略所捕捉,尤其是在信息搜索成本较高时。这一预测在两项实验中得到了证实。参与者的任务是反复推断由多个线索描述的两个选项中哪一个具有更高的标准值。在第一个实验中,在高信息冗余情况下,简单启发式策略比在低信息冗余情况下能更好地预测推理过程。在第二个实验中,这一结果可以推广到参与者没有事先通过结果反馈了解策略准确性的推理情境中。结果表明,在各种学习机会下,人们能够对不同的决策环境做出适应性反应。