• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Good judgments do not require complex cognition.良好的判断力并不需要复杂的认知。
Cogn Process. 2010 May;11(2):103-21. doi: 10.1007/s10339-009-0337-0. Epub 2009 Sep 27.
2
Heuristic reasoning and cognitive biases: Are they hindrances to judgments and decision making in orthodontics?启发式推理和认知偏差:它们是否会阻碍正畸学中的判断和决策?
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Mar;139(3):297-304. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.05.018.
3
Probability matching in choice under uncertainty: intuition versus deliberation.不确定性下选择中的概率匹配:直觉与深思熟虑
Cognition. 2009 Oct;113(1):123-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.07.003. Epub 2009 Aug 6.
4
The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: testing three principles of harm.有意识推理和直觉在道德判断中的作用:检验伤害的三条原则。
Psychol Sci. 2006 Dec;17(12):1082-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01834.x.
5
Where is the "meta" in animal metacognition?动物元认知中的“元”体现在哪里?
J Comp Psychol. 2014 May;128(2):143-9. doi: 10.1037/a0033444. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
6
Commentary on utility and bounds.关于效用和界限的评论。
Top Cogn Sci. 2014 Apr;6(2):338-41. doi: 10.1111/tops.12090.
7
Can cognitive psychological research on reasoning enhance the discussion around moral judgments?关于推理的认知心理学研究能否增进围绕道德判断的讨论?
Cogn Process. 2016 Aug;17(3):329-35. doi: 10.1007/s10339-016-0760-y. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
8
Discriminating the relation between relations: the role of entropy in abstract conceptualization by baboons (Papio papio) and humans (Homo sapiens).区分关系之间的关系:熵在狒狒(豚尾狒狒)和人类(智人)抽象概念形成中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2001 Oct;27(4):316-28.
9
Deliberation's blindsight: how cognitive load can improve judgments.深思熟虑的盲目性:认知负荷如何提高判断。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Jun;24(6):869-79. doi: 10.1177/0956797612463581. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
10
Comparative judgments with missing information: a regression and process tracing analysis.缺失信息下的比较判断:回归与过程追踪分析
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2007 May;125(1):66-84. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.06.005. Epub 2006 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Risks to the clinician of risk management: recalled and anticipated consequences of decision-making.风险管理给临床医生带来的风险:决策的回顾性和预期性后果。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Feb 27;16:1484372. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1484372. eCollection 2025.
2
How Do Paediatricians Manage Comfort with Uncertainty in Clinical Decision-Making.儿科医生如何在临床决策中应对不确定性时感到舒适。
Perspect Med Educ. 2024 Oct 22;13(1):527-539. doi: 10.5334/pme.1394. eCollection 2024.
3
Development and validation of the multi-dimensional metamemory skills (MDMS) scale for students in an Indian sample.发展和验证多维元记忆技能(MDMS)量表在印度样本学生中的应用。
Cogn Process. 2023 Aug;24(3):375-386. doi: 10.1007/s10339-023-01135-3. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
4
A Generative View of Rationality and Growing Awareness.理性与不断增长的意识的生成性观点。
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 7;13:807261. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.807261. eCollection 2022.
5
Recognizing Decision-Making Using Eye Movement: A Case Study With Children.利用眼动识别决策过程:一项针对儿童的案例研究。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 24;11:570470. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.570470. eCollection 2020.
6
Identifying the narrative used by educators in articulating judgement of performance.识别教育工作者在表达绩效判断时使用的叙述方式。
Perspect Med Educ. 2019 Apr;8(2):83-89. doi: 10.1007/s40037-019-0500-y.
7
A Theory of Predictive Dissonance: Predictive Processing Presents a New Take on Cognitive Dissonance.预测失调理论:预测加工对认知失调提出新见解。
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 19;9:2218. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02218. eCollection 2018.
8
When high working memory capacity is and is not beneficial for predicting nonlinear processes.高工作记忆容量何时对预测非线性过程有益以及何时无益。
Mem Cognit. 2017 Apr;45(3):404-412. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0665-0.
9
Knowledge and Informed Decision-Making about Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Participation in Groups with Low and Adequate Health Literacy.关于健康素养低和足够的人群参与基于人群的结直肠癌筛查的知识和知情决策
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2016;2016:7292369. doi: 10.1155/2016/7292369. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
10
The impact of epistemological beliefs and cognitive ability on recall and critical evaluation of scientific information.认识论信念和认知能力对科学信息的回忆与批判性评估的影响。
Cogn Process. 2016 May;17(2):213-23. doi: 10.1007/s10339-015-0748-z. Epub 2016 Jan 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Helping Doctors and Patients Make Sense of Health Statistics.帮助医生和患者理解健康统计数据。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2007 Nov;8(2):53-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6053.2008.00033.x. Epub 2007 Nov 1.
2
Two Is Not Always Better Than One: A Critical Evaluation of Two-System Theories.并非二即总比一好:对两系统理论的批判性评估。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009 Nov;4(6):533-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01164.x.
3
Homo heuristicus: why biased minds make better inferences.《智人启发式:为何有偏见的思维能做出更好的推断》
Top Cogn Sci. 2009 Jan;1(1):107-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01006.x.
4
Heuristic thinking and human intelligence: a commentary on Marewski, Gaissmaier and Gigerenzer.启发式思维与人类智能:对马雷夫斯基、盖斯迈尔和吉仁泽的评论
Cogn Process. 2010 May;11(2):171-5; author reply 177-9. doi: 10.1007/s10339-009-0339-y. Epub 2009 Oct 16.
5
Smart strategies for doctors and doctors-in-training: heuristics in medicine.医生和医学生的明智策略:医学中的启发式方法。
Med Educ. 2009 Aug;43(8):721-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03359.x. Epub 2009 Jul 1.
6
Take-the-best in expert-novice decision strategies for residential burglary.住宅盗窃案专家-新手决策策略中的最佳选择法
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Feb;16(1):163-9. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.1.163.
7
The smart potential behind probability matching.概率匹配背后的智能潜力。
Cognition. 2008 Dec;109(3):416-22. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.09.007. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
8
Fluency heuristic: a model of how the mind exploits a by-product of information retrieval.流畅性启发式:一种关于大脑如何利用信息检索副产品的模型。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Sep;34(5):1191-206. doi: 10.1037/a0013025.
9
Multiple-reason decision making based on automatic processing.基于自动加工的多理由决策
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Sep;34(5):1055-75. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.5.1055.
10
Invariants of human behavior.人类行为的不变量。
Annu Rev Psychol. 1990;41:1-19. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.000245.

良好的判断力并不需要复杂的认知。

Good judgments do not require complex cognition.

作者信息

Marewski Julian N, Gaissmaier Wolfgang, Gigerenzer Gerd

机构信息

Center for Adaptive Behavior and Cognition, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Lentzeallee 94, 14195, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Cogn Process. 2010 May;11(2):103-21. doi: 10.1007/s10339-009-0337-0. Epub 2009 Sep 27.

DOI:10.1007/s10339-009-0337-0
PMID:19784854
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2860098/
Abstract

What cognitive capabilities allow Homo sapiens to successfully bet on the stock market, to catch balls in baseball games, to accurately predict the outcomes of political elections, or to correctly decide whether a patient needs to be allocated to the coronary care unit? It is a widespread belief in psychology and beyond that complex judgment tasks require complex solutions. Countering this common intuition, in this article, we argue that in an uncertain world actually the opposite is true: Humans do not need complex cognitive strategies to make good inferences, estimations, and other judgments; rather, it is the very simplicity and robustness of our cognitive repertoire that makes Homo sapiens a capable decision maker.

摘要

哪些认知能力使智人能够成功地在股票市场上押注、在棒球比赛中接球、准确预测政治选举结果,或者正确决定是否需要将一名患者分配到冠心病监护病房?在心理学及其他领域,人们普遍认为复杂的判断任务需要复杂的解决方案。与这种常见的直觉相反,在本文中,我们认为,在一个不确定的世界里,实际情况恰恰相反:人类不需要复杂的认知策略来做出良好的推理、估计和其他判断;相反,正是我们认知技能库的极度简单性和稳健性使智人成为有能力的决策者。