Casement Melynda D, Shestyuk Avgusta Y, Best Jennifer L, Casas Brooks R, Glezer Anna, Segundo Marisol A, Deldin Patricia J
University of Michigan, 530 Church Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.
Biol Psychol. 2008 Feb;77(2):197-204. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.10.007. Epub 2007 Oct 18.
Anticipation for future affective events and prediction uncertainty were examined in healthy controls and individuals with dysthymia (DYS) using behavioral responses and the contingent negative variation (CNV) and post-imperative negative variation (PINV) event-related potential (ERP) components. Warning stimuli forecasted the valence of subsequently presented adjectives ("+", positive; "=", neutral; "-", negative), and participants indicated whether each adjective would describe them over the next two weeks. Controls expected fewer negative, and individuals with DYS expected fewer positive, adjectives to apply to them. CNV amplitudes were enhanced in controls prior to positive versus other adjectives. Response times and PINV amplitudes were greater following neutral compared to other adjectives, and PINV was larger overall in dysthymics compared to controls. In sum, healthy controls and individuals with DYS exhibit different behavioral and neurophysiological biases in anticipation for future affective events. These results are discussed in the context of cognitive theories of depression.
使用行为反应以及关联性负变(CNV)和命令后负变(PINV)事件相关电位(ERP)成分,对健康对照组和心境恶劣障碍(DYS)个体未来情感事件的预期和预测不确定性进行了研究。警告刺激预测随后呈现的形容词的效价(“+”,积极;“=”,中性;“-”,消极),参与者指出每个形容词在接下来的两周内是否会描述他们自己。对照组预期适用于自己的消极形容词较少,而患有心境恶劣障碍的个体预期适用于自己的积极形容词较少。与其他形容词相比,在呈现积极形容词之前,对照组的CNV波幅增强。与其他形容词相比,中性形容词之后的反应时间和PINV波幅更大,并且与对照组相比,心境恶劣障碍患者的PINV总体上更大。总之,健康对照组和心境恶劣障碍个体在对未来情感事件的预期中表现出不同的行为和神经生理偏差。在抑郁症的认知理论背景下讨论了这些结果。