Suppr超能文献

丙泊酚在急诊科用于镇静的情况。

The use of propofol for sedation in the emergency department.

作者信息

Swanson E R, Seaberg D C, Mathias S

机构信息

University of Pittsburgh Affiliated Residency in Emergency Medicine, PA, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 1996 Mar;3(3):234-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1996.tb03426.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of propofol and fentanyl when used by emergency physicians (EPs) for systemic sedation and analgesia in the ED.

METHODS

Over an eight-month period, a convenience sample of consenting patients at an urban teaching hospital ED who required sedation for painful procedures were enrolled in a descriptive study of therapeutic propofol sedation. After receiving 2 micrograms/kg of fentanyl i.v. the patients received a continuous infusion of propofol at 0.21 mg/kg/min i.v. to the desired level of sedation. A maintenance infusion of 3-6 mg/kg/hr was administered during the remainder of the procedure. Sedation time, total procedure time, and recovery time were recorded and the presence of side effects was noted. The patients and the physicians rated their satisfaction with the technique on a 100-mm visual analog scale. The patients were contacted at 24 hours for follow-up information.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (aged 19-62 years) received propofol infusion for procedures that included ten abscess incision and drainages, eight orthopedic reductions, one chest tube placement, and one wound exploration. The mean (+/- SD) total dose of propofol was 200 +/- 160 mg. The mean time to onset of sedation was 6.6 +/- 3.2 min, the mean procedure interval was 9.6 +/- 6.3 min, and the mean interval until recovery was 6.1 +/- 4.1 min. The median patient satisfaction score was 97 mm (range 40-100 mm); the median rating by physicians was 88 mm (range 4-100 mm). Side effects were noted in six patients: three had pain on injection, one had pain on injection and brief (< 1 min) hypotension (systolic blood pressure = 80 mm Hg), and two had apnea (< 30 sec). Seven patients had some recall of the procedure immediately afterwards, but only five had any recall at 24 hours. All 20 patients stated they would be willing to receive the same sedation again for a future procedure.

CONCLUSION

Propofol appears to be an effective agent to provide systemic sedation and analgesia when used in conjunction with fentanyl for procedures in the ED. Given its rapidity of onset and elimination, it may become a useful agent to EPs for i.v. sedation in the ED.

摘要

目的

评估急诊医生(EPs)在急诊科使用丙泊酚和芬太尼进行全身镇静和镇痛的效果。

方法

在八个月的时间里,对一家城市教学医院急诊科同意参与研究的患者进行便利抽样,这些患者因疼痛性操作需要镇静,纳入丙泊酚治疗性镇静的描述性研究。患者静脉注射2微克/千克芬太尼后,以0.21毫克/千克/分钟的速度静脉持续输注丙泊酚,直至达到所需的镇静水平。在操作的剩余时间内给予3 - 6毫克/千克/小时的维持输注。记录镇静时间、总操作时间和恢复时间,并记录副作用的发生情况。患者和医生使用100毫米视觉模拟量表对该技术的满意度进行评分。在24小时时联系患者获取随访信息。

结果

20名患者(年龄19 - 62岁)接受丙泊酚输注用于包括10例脓肿切开引流、8例骨科复位、1例胸腔闭式引流管置入和1例伤口探查在内 的操作。丙泊酚的平均(±标准差)总剂量为200±160毫克。镇静起效的平均时间为6.6±3.2分钟,平均操作时间为9.6±6.3分钟,恢复前的平均间隔时间为6.1±4.1分钟。患者满意度评分中位数为97毫米(范围40 - 100毫米);医生评分中位数为88毫米(范围4 - 100毫米)。6名患者出现副作用:3名患者注射时疼痛,1名患者注射时疼痛并伴有短暂(<1分钟)低血压(收缩压 = 80毫米汞柱),2名患者出现呼吸暂停(<30秒)。7名患者术后立即对操作有一些记忆,但24小时时只有5名患者有记忆。所有20名患者表示他们愿意在未来的操作中再次接受相同的镇静。

结论

丙泊酚与芬太尼联合用于急诊科的操作时,似乎是一种有效的全身镇静和镇痛药物。鉴于其起效和消除迅速,它可能成为急诊医生在急诊科进行静脉镇静的有用药物。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验