Suppr超能文献

危重症、机械通气患者的非镇静或浅镇静。

Nonsedation or Light Sedation in Critically Ill, Mechanically Ventilated Patients.

机构信息

From the Departments of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Odense University Hospital-Svendborg Hospital, Svendborg (H.T.O.), the Departments of Clinical Research (H.T.O., H.K.N., T.S., J.O., P.T.) and Business and Economics (S.K., J.T.L.), University of Southern Denmark, and the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Odense University Hospital (T.S., P.T.), Odense, the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hospital Lillebaelt, Kolding (H.K.N.), and the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Esbjerg Hospital, Esbjerg (J.O.) - all in Denmark; the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Vestfold Hospital, Tønsberg (K.-A.W.), and the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø (L.M.Y., B.A.K.) - both in Norway; and the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden (M.C.).

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 19;382(12):1103-1111. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1906759. Epub 2020 Feb 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients, daily interruption of sedation has been shown to reduce the time on ventilation and the length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). Data on whether a plan of no sedation, as compared with a plan of light sedation, has an effect on mortality are lacking.

METHODS

In a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial, we assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, mechanically ventilated ICU patients to a plan of no sedation (nonsedation group) or to a plan of light sedation (i.e., to a level at which the patient was arousable, defined as a score of -2 to -3 on the Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale [RASS], on which scores range from -5 [unresponsive] to +4 [combative]) (sedation group) with daily interruption. The primary outcome was mortality at 90 days. Secondary outcomes were the number of major thromboembolic events, the number of days free from coma or delirium, acute kidney injury according to severity, the number of ICU-free days, and the number of ventilator-free days. Between-group differences were calculated as the value in the nonsedation group minus the value in the sedation group.

RESULTS

A total of 710 patients underwent randomization, and 700 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. The characteristics of the patients at baseline were similar in the two trial groups, except for the score on the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, which was 1 point higher in the nonsedation group than in the sedation group, indicating a greater chance of in-hospital death. The mean RASS score in the nonsedation group increased from -1.3 on day 1 to -0.8 on day 7 and, in the sedation group, from -2.3 on day 1 to -1.8 on day 7. Mortality at 90 days was 42.4% in the nonsedation group and 37.0% in the sedated group (difference, 5.4 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.2 to 12.2; P = 0.65). The number of ICU-free days and of ventilator-free days did not differ significantly between the trial groups. The patients in the nonsedation group had a median of 27 days free from coma or delirium, and those in the sedation group had a median of 26 days free from coma or delirium. A major thromboembolic event occurred in 1 patient (0.3%) in the nonsedation group and in 10 patients (2.8%) in the sedation group (difference, -2.5 percentage points; 95% CI, -4.8 to -0.7 [unadjusted for multiple comparisons]).

CONCLUSIONS

Among mechanically ventilated ICU patients, mortality at 90 days did not differ significantly between those assigned to a plan of no sedation and those assigned to a plan of light sedation with daily interruption. (Funded by the Danish Medical Research Council and others; NONSEDA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01967680.).

摘要

背景

在重症、机械通气患者中,每日中断镇静已被证明可减少通气时间和 ICU 住院时间。缺乏关于无镇静计划与轻度镇静计划相比是否会影响死亡率的数据。

方法

在一项多中心、随机、对照试验中,我们以 1:1 的比例将机械通气 ICU 患者随机分配至无镇静计划(无镇静组)或轻度镇静计划(即患者可唤醒,定义为 Richmond 躁动和镇静量表[RASS]评分为-2 至-3[无反应]至+4[有攻击性])(镇静组),并每日中断镇静。主要结局为 90 天死亡率。次要结局为主要血栓栓塞事件的数量、无昏迷或谵妄天数、根据严重程度定义的急性肾损伤的天数、无 ICU 天数和无呼吸机天数。组间差异计算为无镇静组减去镇静组的值。

结果

共有 710 名患者接受了随机分组,700 名患者被纳入改良意向治疗分析。两组试验患者的基线特征相似,除急性生理学和慢性健康评估(APACHE)Ⅱ评分外,无镇静组比镇静组高 1 分,提示住院死亡的机会更大。无镇静组的 RASS 评分从第 1 天的-1.3 增加到第 7 天的-0.8,镇静组从第 1 天的-2.3 增加到第 7 天的-1.8。90 天死亡率无镇静组为 42.4%,镇静组为 37.0%(差异 5.4 个百分点;95%置信区间[CI],-2.2 至 12.2;P=0.65)。两组试验组的 ICU 无天数和呼吸机无天数无显著差异。无镇静组的中位无昏迷或谵妄天数为 27 天,镇静组为 26 天。无镇静组发生 1 例(0.3%)和镇静组发生 10 例(2.8%)主要血栓栓塞事件(差异-2.5 个百分点;95%CI,-4.8 至-0.7[未调整多重比较])。

结论

在机械通气的 ICU 患者中,无镇静计划与每日中断镇静的轻度镇静计划相比,90 天死亡率无显著差异。(由丹麦医学研究委员会等资助;NONSEDA ClinicalTrials.gov 编号,NCT01967680)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验