• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本激素受体阳性、淋巴结阴性、人表皮生长因子受体 2 阴性早期乳腺癌中 70 基因预后标志物(MammaPrint®)的经济学评价。

Economic evaluation of the 70-gene prognosis-signature (MammaPrint®) in hormone receptor-positive, lymph node-negative, human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2-negative early stage breast cancer in Japan.

机构信息

Department of Health Care Policy and Management, Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Jun;133(2):759-68. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-1979-7.

DOI:10.1007/s10549-012-1979-7
PMID:22315134
Abstract

The 70-gene prognosis-signature is validated as a good predictor of recurrence for hormone receptor-positive (ER+), lymph node-negative (LN-), human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2-negative (HER2-) early stage breast cancer (ESBC) in Japanese patient population. Its high cost and potential in avoiding unnecessary adjuvant chemotherapy arouse interest in its economic impact. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of including the assay into Japan's social health insurance benefit package. An economic decision tree and Markov model under Japan's health system from the societal perspective is constructed with clinical evidence from the pool analysis of validation studies. One-way sensitivity analyses are also performed. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is estimated as ¥3,873,922/quality adjusted life year (QALY) (US$43,044/QALY), which is not more than the suggested social willingness-to-pay for one QALY gain from an innovative medical intervention in Japan, ¥5,000,000/QALY (US$55,556/QALY). However, sensitivity analyses show the instability of this estimation. The introduction of the assay into Japanese practice of ER+, LN-, HER2- ESBC treatment by including it to Japan's social health insurance benefit package has a reasonable chance to be judged as cost-effective and may be justified as an efficient deployment of finite health care resources.

摘要

70 基因预后标志物在日本激素受体阳性(ER+)、淋巴结阴性(LN-)、人表皮生长因子受体 2 阴性(HER2-)早期乳腺癌(ESBC)患者中被验证为复发的良好预测指标。其高成本和避免辅助化疗的潜力引起了人们对其经济影响的兴趣。本研究评估了将该检测纳入日本社会医疗保险福利计划的成本效益。从社会角度来看,根据验证研究的汇总分析中的临床证据,构建了一个基于经济决策树和 Markov 模型的日本卫生系统。还进行了单向敏感性分析。增量成本效益比估计为 ¥3,873,922/质量调整生命年(QALY)(US$43,044/QALY),这低于日本对创新医疗干预措施每获得一个 QALY 增益的社会意愿支付价格 ¥5,000,000/QALY(US$55,556/QALY)。然而,敏感性分析表明这一估计的不稳定性。通过将该检测纳入日本 ER+、LN-、HER2-ESBC 治疗的常规实践,并将其纳入日本社会医疗保险福利计划,该检测在日本的引入具有合理的成本效益判断机会,并可能被证明是对有限医疗资源的有效利用。

相似文献

1
Economic evaluation of the 70-gene prognosis-signature (MammaPrint®) in hormone receptor-positive, lymph node-negative, human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2-negative early stage breast cancer in Japan.日本激素受体阳性、淋巴结阴性、人表皮生长因子受体 2 阴性早期乳腺癌中 70 基因预后标志物(MammaPrint®)的经济学评价。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Jun;133(2):759-68. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-1979-7.
2
Economic evaluation of the 21-gene signature (Oncotype DX) in lymph node-negative/positive, hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer based on Japanese validation study (JBCRG-TR03).基于日本验证研究(JBCRG-TR03)的淋巴结阴性/阳性、激素受体阳性早期乳腺癌 21 基因标志物(Oncotype DX)的经济学评价。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Jun;127(3):739-49. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-1243-y. Epub 2010 Nov 17.
3
Economic evaluation of 21-gene reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay in lymph-node-negative, estrogen-receptor-positive, early-stage breast cancer in Japan.日本淋巴结阴性、雌激素受体阳性早期乳腺癌21基因逆转录聚合酶链反应检测法的经济学评估
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008 Nov;112(1):175-87. doi: 10.1007/s10549-007-9842-y. Epub 2007 Dec 13.
4
Cost effectiveness of gene expression profiling for early stage breast cancer: a decision-analytic model.基因表达谱分析在早期乳腺癌中的成本效益:决策分析模型。
Cancer. 2012 Oct 15;118(20):5163-70. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27443. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
5
Cost-effectiveness of 21-gene assay in node-positive, early-stage breast cancer.21 基因检测在淋巴结阳性早期乳腺癌中的成本效益。
Am J Manag Care. 2011;17(7):455-64.
6
Cost-effectiveness of the 70-gene signature versus St. Gallen guidelines and Adjuvant Online for early breast cancer.70 基因签名与圣加仑指南和 Adjuvant Online 在早期乳腺癌中的成本效益比较。
Eur J Cancer. 2010 May;46(8):1382-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.02.035. Epub 2010 Mar 30.
7
Cost-utility of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in node-negative and node-positive breast cancer.21 基因复发评分检测在淋巴结阴性和淋巴结阳性乳腺癌中的成本效用。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Jun;133(3):1115-23. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-1989-5. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
8
Economic evaluation of intensive chemotherapy with prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for patients with high-risk early breast cancer in Japan.日本高危早期乳腺癌患者强化化疗联合预防性粒细胞集落刺激因子的经济学评价。
Clin Ther. 2010 Feb;32(2):311-26. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.01.029.
9
US insurance program's experience with a multigene assay for early-stage breast cancer.美国保险计划在早期乳腺癌多基因检测方面的经验。
Am J Manag Care. 2011 May 1;17(5 Spec No):e194-202.
10
Cost-effectiveness of the 21-gene assay for guiding adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in early breast cancer.21 基因检测在指导早期乳腺癌辅助化疗决策中的成本效益。
Value Health. 2013 Jul-Aug;16(5):729-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.03.1625. Epub 2013 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-Utility Analysis of Multigene Assays to Guide Treatment Decisions for Node-Negative Early Breast Cancer.多基因检测指导淋巴结阴性早期乳腺癌治疗决策的成本效用分析
Oncol Ther. 2025 Mar;13(1):99-114. doi: 10.1007/s40487-024-00312-4. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
2
Recommendations from the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer for multigene testing to guide the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early breast cancer, hormone receptor positive, HER-2 negative.欧盟委员会乳腺癌倡议就多基因检测提出的建议,以指导激素受体阳性、HER-2阴性的早期乳腺癌患者辅助化疗的使用。
Br J Cancer. 2021 Apr;124(9):1503-1512. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-01247-z. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
3
Modeling and comparing data mining algorithms for prediction of recurrence of breast cancer.
建立并比较数据挖掘算法模型以预测乳腺癌的复发。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 15;15(10):e0237658. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237658. eCollection 2020.
4
Gene Expression Profiling Tests for Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: A Health Technology Assessment.早期浸润性乳腺癌的基因表达谱检测:一项卫生技术评估
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2020 Mar 6;20(10):1-234. eCollection 2020.
5
circTADA2As suppress breast cancer progression and metastasis via targeting miR-203a-3p/SOCS3 axis.环状 RNA TADA2A 通过靶向 miR-203a-3p/SOCS3 轴抑制乳腺癌的进展和转移。
Cell Death Dis. 2019 Feb 20;10(3):175. doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-1382-y.
6
Clinical utility of gene-expression profiling in women with early breast cancer: an overview of systematic reviews.基因表达谱在早期乳腺癌女性中的临床应用:系统评价综述
Genet Med. 2015 Jul;17(7):519-32. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.140. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
7
Is individualized medicine more cost-effective? A systematic review.个性化医疗是否更具成本效益?一项系统评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 May;32(5):443-55. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0143-0.
8
Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013.个体化治疗早期乳腺癌女性:2013 年圣加仑国际早期乳腺癌专家共识初级治疗要点。
Ann Oncol. 2013 Sep;24(9):2206-23. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt303. Epub 2013 Aug 4.
9
Multigene assays and molecular markers in breast cancer: systematic review of health economic analyses.多基因检测与乳腺癌分子标志物:系统评价健康经济学分析。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Jun;139(3):621-37. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2559-1. Epub 2013 May 31.