Gamble John
International Environmental Research Foundation, P.O. Box 3459, Grand Central Station, New York, NY 10163-3459, USA.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008 Oct;52(1 Suppl):S124-53. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2007.10.009. Epub 2007 Oct 26.
This paper summarizes the weight of epidemiological evidence to evaluate the hypothesis that asbestos exposure is causally associated with increased risk of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers as suggested by Selikoff in an early study of insulation workers. This review looks at populations that develop GI cancers, namely stomach, colorectal, colon and rectal. Guidelines for assessing causality are strength of association, biological gradient and consistency of the associations. Exposure-response (E-R) was evaluated using three methods to estimate exposure. Rate Ratios (RRs) for lung cancer and percent of mesothelioma are used as surrogate measures of asbestos exposure for all the cohorts of exposed workers. Quantitative or semi-quantitative estimates of cumulative exposure to asbestos were also used to assess E-R trends and were compared to E-R trends for lung cancer and mesothelioma in individual studies. Surrogate measures are important since there are few individual studies that have assessed E-R. None of the various methods to estimate asbestos exposure yielded consistent E-R trends and the strength of the associations were consistently weak or non-existent for the four types of GI cancers. The epidemiological evidence detracts from the hypothesis that occupational asbestos exposure increases the risk of stomach, colorectal, colon, and rectal cancer. Findings are briefly summarized below.
本文总结了流行病学证据的权重,以评估如下假设:正如塞利科夫在早期对绝缘工人的研究中所指出的,接触石棉与胃肠道(GI)癌症风险增加存在因果关系。本综述关注罹患胃肠道癌症的人群,即胃癌、结直肠癌、结肠癌和直肠癌患者。评估因果关系的准则包括关联强度、生物学梯度和关联的一致性。采用三种方法估计接触量来评估暴露-反应(E-R)关系。肺癌发病率比(RRs)和间皮瘤百分比用作所有接触工人队列中石棉接触的替代指标。石棉累积接触的定量或半定量估计也用于评估E-R趋势,并与个别研究中肺癌和间皮瘤的E-R趋势进行比较。替代指标很重要,因为很少有个别研究评估过E-R关系。估计石棉接触的各种方法均未得出一致的E-R趋势,并且对于四种胃肠道癌症类型,关联强度始终较弱或不存在。流行病学证据削弱了职业性接触石棉会增加胃癌、结直肠癌、结肠癌和直肠癌风险这一假设。研究结果简要总结如下。