• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

啮齿动物物种对猪内源性逆转录病毒A亚组细胞进入的差异抗性。

Differential resistance to cell entry by porcine endogenous retrovirus subgroup A in rodent species.

作者信息

Mattiuzzo Giada, Matouskova Magda, Takeuchi Yasuhiro

机构信息

Wohl Virion Centre, Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, W1T 4JF, London, UK.

出版信息

Retrovirology. 2007 Dec 14;4:93. doi: 10.1186/1742-4690-4-93.

DOI:10.1186/1742-4690-4-93
PMID:18081925
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2241639/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The risk of zoonotic infection by porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERV) has been highlighted in the context of pig-to-human xenotransplantation. The use of receptors for cell entry often determines the host range of retroviruses. A human-tropic PERV subgroup, PERV-A, can enter human cells through either of two homologous multitransmembrane proteins, huPAR-1 and huPAR-2. Here, we characterised human PARs and their homologues in the PERV-A resistant rodent species, mouse and rat (muPAR and ratPAR, respectively).

RESULTS

Upon exogenous expression in PERV-A resistant cells, human and rat PARs, but not muPAR, conferred PERV-A sensitivity. Exogenously expressed ratPAR binds PERV-A Env and allows PERV-A infection with equivalent efficiency to that of huPAR-1. Endogenous ratPAR expression in rat cell lines appeared to be too low for PERV-A infection. In contrast, the presence of Pro at position 109 in muPAR was identified to be the determinant for PERV-A resistance. Pro109. was shown to be located in the second extracellular loop (ECL2) and affected PERV-A Env binding to PAR molecules.

CONCLUSION

The basis of resistance to PERV-A infection in two rodent species is different. Identification of a single a.a. mutation in muPAR, which is responsible for mouse cell resistance to PERV-A highlighted the importance of ECL-2 for the viral receptor function.

摘要

背景

在猪到人的异种移植背景下,猪内源性逆转录病毒(PERV)人畜共患感染的风险已受到关注。细胞进入受体的使用通常决定逆转录病毒的宿主范围。一种嗜人PERV亚组,PERV-A,可通过两种同源多跨膜蛋白huPAR-1和huPAR-2中的任何一种进入人类细胞。在此,我们对PERV-A抗性啮齿动物物种小鼠和大鼠(分别为muPAR和ratPAR)中的人类PAR及其同源物进行了表征。

结果

在PERV-A抗性细胞中外源表达时,人类和大鼠PAR(而非muPAR)赋予了对PERV-A的敏感性。外源表达的ratPAR与PERV-A Env结合,并允许PERV-A以与huPAR-1相当的效率感染。大鼠细胞系中内源性ratPAR的表达似乎太低,不足以支持PERV-A感染。相比之下,已确定muPAR中第109位的脯氨酸(Pro)是PERV-A抗性的决定因素。Pro109位于第二个细胞外环(ECL2)中,并影响PERV-A Env与PAR分子的结合。

结论

两种啮齿动物物种对PERV-A感染的抗性基础不同。在muPAR中鉴定出一个单一氨基酸突变,该突变导致小鼠细胞对PERV-A具有抗性,这突出了ECL-2对病毒受体功能的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7be2/2241639/0eaef713b0ea/1742-4690-4-93-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7be2/2241639/e6ed6f1e0454/1742-4690-4-93-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7be2/2241639/40e47e990f85/1742-4690-4-93-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7be2/2241639/bb53449200c9/1742-4690-4-93-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7be2/2241639/285b8efb85e4/1742-4690-4-93-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7be2/2241639/0eaef713b0ea/1742-4690-4-93-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7be2/2241639/e6ed6f1e0454/1742-4690-4-93-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7be2/2241639/40e47e990f85/1742-4690-4-93-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7be2/2241639/bb53449200c9/1742-4690-4-93-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7be2/2241639/285b8efb85e4/1742-4690-4-93-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7be2/2241639/0eaef713b0ea/1742-4690-4-93-5.jpg

相似文献

1
Differential resistance to cell entry by porcine endogenous retrovirus subgroup A in rodent species.啮齿动物物种对猪内源性逆转录病毒A亚组细胞进入的差异抗性。
Retrovirology. 2007 Dec 14;4:93. doi: 10.1186/1742-4690-4-93.
2
Identification of residues outside of the receptor binding domain that influence the infectivity and tropism of porcine endogenous retrovirus.鉴定影响猪内源性逆转录病毒感染性和嗜性的受体结合域外的残基。
J Virol. 2008 Aug;82(15):7483-91. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00295-08. Epub 2008 May 28.
3
Three cysteine residues of SLC52A1, a receptor for the porcine endogenous retrovirus-A (PERV-A), play a critical role in cell surface expression and infectivity.猪内源性逆转录病毒A(PERV-A)的受体SLC52A1的三个半胱氨酸残基在细胞表面表达和感染性中起关键作用。
Virology. 2017 Jul;507:140-150. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2017.04.019. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
4
Identification of two distinct structural regions in a human porcine endogenous retrovirus receptor, HuPAR2, contributing to function for viral entry.在人猪内源性逆转录病毒受体HuPAR2中鉴定出两个不同的结构区域,它们对病毒进入功能有贡献。
Retrovirology. 2009 Jan 14;6:3. doi: 10.1186/1742-4690-6-3.
5
Detailed mapping of determinants within the porcine endogenous retrovirus envelope surface unit identifies critical residues for human cell infection within the proline-rich region.详细绘制猪内源性逆转录病毒包膜表面单元内的决定因素图谱,鉴定脯氨酸丰富区域内感染人细胞的关键残基。
J Virol. 2012 Sep;86(17):9096-104. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00738-12. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
6
Suboptimal porcine endogenous retrovirus infection in non-human primate cells: implication for preclinical xenotransplantation.非人类灵长类动物细胞中的猪内源性逆转录病毒感染不理想:对临床前异种移植的影响。
PLoS One. 2010 Oct 6;5(10):e13203. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013203.
7
Mice transgenic for a human porcine endogenous retrovirus receptor are susceptible to productive viral infection.携带人类猪内源性逆转录病毒受体的转基因小鼠易受有活性的病毒感染。
J Virol. 2006 Apr;80(7):3135-46. doi: 10.1128/JVI.80.7.3135-3146.2006.
8
Evidence and consequence of porcine endogenous retrovirus recombination.猪内源性逆转录病毒重组的证据及后果。
J Virol. 2004 Dec;78(24):13880-90. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.24.13880-13890.2004.
9
Identification of receptors for pig endogenous retrovirus.猪内源性逆转录病毒受体的鉴定。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 May 27;100(11):6759-64. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1138025100. Epub 2003 May 9.
10
Binding of transcription factor activating protein 2 γ on the 5'-proximal promoter region of human porcine endogenous retrovirus subgroup A receptor 2/GPR172B.转录因子激活蛋白 2γ与人类猪内源性逆转录病毒亚群 A 受体 2/GPR172B5'-近端启动子区的结合。
Xenotransplantation. 2012 May-Jun;19(3):177-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3089.2012.00701.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Co-Cultivation Assays for Detecting Infectious Human-Tropic Porcine Endogenous Retroviruses (PERVs).用于检测具有人嗜性的传染性猪内源性逆转录病毒(PERV)的共培养分析
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Jul 23;26(15):7111. doi: 10.3390/ijms26157111.
2
Riboflavin transporter: evidence of a role as entry receptor for chimpanzee endogenous retrovirus.核黄素转运蛋白:作为黑猩猩内源性逆转录病毒进入受体的作用证据。
Virus Evol. 2025 May 7;11(1):veaf031. doi: 10.1093/ve/veaf031. eCollection 2025.
3
Rare isolation of human-tropic recombinant porcine endogenous retroviruses PERV-A/C from Göttingen minipigs.

本文引用的文献

1
Functional epitopes on porcine endogenous retrovirus envelope protein interacting with neutralizing antibody combining sites.猪内源性逆转录病毒包膜蛋白上与中和抗体结合位点相互作用的功能性表位。
Virology. 2007 May 10;361(2):364-71. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2006.11.016. Epub 2007 Jan 10.
2
Retroviral invasion of the koala genome.逆转录病毒对考拉基因组的入侵。
Nature. 2006 Jul 6;442(7098):79-81. doi: 10.1038/nature04841.
3
A putative thiamine transport protein is a receptor for feline leukemia virus subgroup A.一种假定的硫胺素转运蛋白是A型猫白血病病毒的受体。
从哥廷根小型猪中罕见地分离出人嗜性重组猪内源性逆转录病毒 PERV-A/C。
Virol J. 2022 Feb 21;19(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12985-022-01742-0.
4
Porcine Endogenous Retroviruses and Xenotransplantation, 2021.猪内源性逆转录病毒与异种移植,2021 年。
Viruses. 2021 Oct 26;13(11):2156. doi: 10.3390/v13112156.
5
Why was PERV not transmitted during preclinical and clinical xenotransplantation trials and after inoculation of animals?为什么在临床前和临床异种移植试验以及动物接种后没有传播 PERV ?
Retrovirology. 2018 Apr 2;15(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12977-018-0411-8.
6
Role of DNA methylation in expression and transmission of porcine endogenous retroviruses.DNA 甲基化在猪内源性逆转录病毒的表达和传播中的作用。
J Virol. 2013 Nov;87(22):12110-20. doi: 10.1128/JVI.03262-12. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
7
Microbiological safety of a novel bio-artificial liver support system based on porcine hepatocytes: a experimental study.新型基于猪肝细胞的生物人工肝支持系统的微生物安全性:实验研究。
Eur J Med Res. 2012 May 25;17(1):13. doi: 10.1186/2047-783X-17-13.
8
Infection barriers to successful xenotransplantation focusing on porcine endogenous retroviruses.针对猪内源性逆转录病毒的成功异种移植的感染屏障。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2012 Apr;25(2):318-43. doi: 10.1128/CMR.05011-11.
9
Comparison of the convergent receptor utilization of a retargeted feline leukemia virus envelope with a naturally-occurring porcine endogenous retrovirus A.比较重定向的猫白血病病毒包膜与天然存在的猪内源性逆转录病毒 A 的收敛受体利用
Virology. 2012 Jun 5;427(2):118-26. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2012.02.012. Epub 2012 Mar 8.
10
Suboptimal porcine endogenous retrovirus infection in non-human primate cells: implication for preclinical xenotransplantation.非人类灵长类动物细胞中的猪内源性逆转录病毒感染不理想:对临床前异种移植的影响。
PLoS One. 2010 Oct 6;5(10):e13203. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013203.
J Virol. 2006 Apr;80(7):3378-85. doi: 10.1128/JVI.80.7.3378-3385.2006.
4
The infectivity and host range of the ecotropic porcine endogenous retrovirus, PERV-C, is modulated by residues in the C-terminal region of its surface envelope protein.嗜亲性猪内源性逆转录病毒PERV-C的感染性和宿主范围受其表面包膜蛋白C末端区域残基的调控。
Virology. 2006 Mar 1;346(1):108-17. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2005.10.021. Epub 2005 Nov 23.
5
Differential restriction of human immunodeficiency virus type 2 and simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac by TRIM5alpha alleles.TRIM5α等位基因对2型人类免疫缺陷病毒和猴免疫缺陷病毒SIVmac的差异性限制
J Virol. 2005 Sep;79(18):11580-7. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.18.11580-11587.2005.
6
The potential hazards of xenotransplantation: an overview.异种移植的潜在危害:概述
Rev Sci Tech. 2005 Apr;24(1):323-34.
7
Cell-binding properties of the envelope proteins of porcine endogenous retroviruses.猪内源性逆转录病毒包膜蛋白的细胞结合特性
Microbes Infect. 2005 Apr;7(4):658-65. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2005.01.008. Epub 2005 Mar 22.
8
Evidence and consequence of porcine endogenous retrovirus recombination.猪内源性逆转录病毒重组的证据及后果。
J Virol. 2004 Dec;78(24):13880-90. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.24.13880-13890.2004.
9
Determinants of high titer in recombinant porcine endogenous retroviruses.重组猪内源性逆转录病毒高滴度的决定因素
J Virol. 2004 Dec;78(24):13871-9. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.24.13871-13879.2004.
10
Xenotransplantation: infectious risk revisited.异种移植:重新审视感染风险。
Am J Transplant. 2004 Sep;4(9):1383-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00542.x.